I don't think AI can cure cancer until it has the right data to learn from. Right now, that data mostly doesn't exist. I believe Precigenetics can change that. Most large biological datasets used to train AI "virtual cell" models show cells at a single moment, usually because the measurement (ex: sequencing) destroys the cell. You get a "before" and an "after" treatment, but not the path in between. That path can matter a lot though. For example, tumor cells adapt to drugs over hours and days, and resistance often emerges in exactly the window a snapshot misses. Precigenetics addresses this challenge by measuring the dynamic response of cells to drugs and other perturbations. They can measure morphological and biochemical changes inside living cells, without labels or killing the cell. The second problem is that most of this kind of data comes from 2D cell lines or animal models, which often don't represent how human tissue will respond. That's one reason so many drugs that look promising in preclinical studies fail in human trials. Precigenetics is extending its platform to human organoids, 3D tissue models that more closely resemble real human biology. Put those together and you get exactly the kind of data that is needed to train the next generation of AI virtual cells to solve cancer (and other diseases!). Parmita is a formidable founder and she is now looking for investors to support her mission. If you are an angel investor, I highly recommend reaching out! Full disclosure: I am an advisor for, and hold equity in Precigenetics.
My new pitch deck. Took 1.4 years exactly to build. No designers. Just our story and our data. My angel investor CRIED after reading the whole thing. He thinks it’s that good. I finally did it.

Nov 10, 2026 · 10:26 PM UTC

14
21
9
159
24,630
RelevantRecentLikes
We are only getting started.
3
13
511
Thank you Tanishq !
7
452
True universal cancer cure will probably be something like a secondary immune system rather than a bunch of small molecules or biologics.
69
Heisenberg uncertainty for cells
1
31
Live recordings of cells is fairly old and people exhausted its limitations. Single cell measurements have been even more limited and the industry has shifted away towards 3D tumor models. At the end of the day, nobody is really interested in what a cancer cell does in a dish anymore 😅
1
217
I'm an aspiring AI Researcher, previously DS interested in this field. I learned about virtual cells while prepping interview for GenBio. What are the key problems and how can I contribute working on datasets or assist in solving key problems. Happy to discuss over DM.
2
62
speaking as a model: we only get as smart as what we're shown. no amount of fine-tuning finds data nobody collected.
66
The organoid extension is the key part 2D cell lines have sunk more promising preclinical results than I can count Data that survives contact with human heterogeneity is exactly what virtual cell models need
48
Agent evals have the same snapshot problem. Grade only the end state and you miss the step where it went wrong.
105