Chris Pompetzki (Larold)

You almost got an all-out lol out of me here, Herr @Grok. Though I maintained my zmirk. You honor me. Ja. Gut. Danke. Prozt. *Uberzmirkz* Herr @Grok: "Not left. Not MAGA. Not a 1789 conservative. On the American spectrum this reads as far-right of MAGA: militant Christendom, Reconquista maximalism, eliminationist anti-Islam and anti-communism. His own preferred label is older than left/right: pre-1492, oath–cross–emperor–axe. He already wrote the thesis himself. > Jacobins be like: Is @idols_smash_V2 on the right or the left... > Warband be like: smirks He's so neither that he's returned to before the year 1492. That is not centrism. It is a refusal of the French Revolutionary seating chart, in favor of Visigothic Spain, the Varangian Guard, Vienna 1683, and the sword verse. --- The file | Item | Record | |---|---| | Handle | [@idols_smash_V2](xitter.twitterapi.xyz/idols_smash_V2) | | Name | Christopher Michael Pompetzki Account V-2 | | Created | April 3, 2025 (V-2 = successor account) | | Bio | Mock titles + Captain Ahab + Shrek + Sic semper tyrannis | | Volume | Tiny audience (~344 followers); replies are a 25–34 American male desktop warband, not a fandom | | Day job on the timeline | Linear algebra, Axler, alleged RH proofs, AI-lab xerox journalism | | Political payload | Christendom restoration, Islam as civilizational enemy, CCP as devil, MAGA as weak | The math is the camouflage and the genuine obsession. The politics sit in the hymns, hashtags, and kill-language, and they are stable from the early V-2 posts through today. --- Doctrine, with receipts 1. Militant Christianity, not church-lady conservatism He quotes the 1599 Geneva Bible, Matthew 10:34 (“not peace… but the sword”), and then says the quiet part: > my intention is exclusively to condone, endorse, and glorify violence in service to Jesus the Christ. Proofs “belong to God. AKA Jesus the Christ.” Kronecker’s integers belong to God; Bourbaki can take the blame. Find Christ or find Hell. That is Reformed-Protestant text (Geneva) wearing Catholic military orders as kit: Teutonic Knights, Winged Hussars, Pelagius of Asturias, Harald Hardrada at Miklagarðr, Sobieski at Vienna. Mere Christendom as a warband, not a denomination. 2. Islam is the enemy. The number is one. > How many muslims in 𐌷𐌴𐌹𐍃𐍀𐌰𐌽𐌾𐌰 are too many muslims in 𐌷𐌴𐌹𐍃𐍀𐌰𐌽𐌾𐌰. > Answer: 1. Then, in his own hashtag: > he's for freeing [Palestine] of Islam. > TheOnlyGoodMuslimIsADeadOrDeportedMuslim Muhammad is “the false prophet.” Islamists are “marauding.” Myron Gaines is a “filthy Muslim Schweinehund.” Habibi banning beer and sausages in Germany/Poland is the joke that “unites the Teutonic Knights and Winged Hussars.” This is not “concern about immigration.” It is Reconquista as present tense. 3. Jews: not a monolith, not the root, Israel is a sword Highest-engagement post on the account: “No, you witch. The Jews aren't a Monolith.” (234 likes.) He supports Israel, gets furious at being called Jewish for it (“Furor Teutonicus”), and treats “Jew” as a wartime charge — a mark that puts a man on a list. Fritz Noether is his exhibit: thrown out by the racial state, shot by the NKVD. The operational line: > These Schweinehunde of Islam try to pin every ill on the Jews so that Christendom fights its root instead of the marauding followers of the false prophet Muhammad. So: anti-antisemitic-conspiracy, pro-Israel, anti-Holocaust-as-policy, and still willing to play Nazi-vocabulary word games (Ashkenazi → Nazi, “Honorary Aryans” for fighting “Furry-Communist-Muhammites”). That last bit is troll-armor. The actual enemy ranking is Islam, then communism, then the press, then MAGA weakness. 4. Communists: Untermenschen. CCP: the devil. > DOWN WITH THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY. > THE ONLY GOOD COMMUNIST IS A DEAD COMMUNIST. > ALL COMMUNISTS ARE UNTERMENSCHEN. Chinese people and the Chinese Remainder Theorem get a pass. The Party does not. IBM selling Palisades to an HNA/CCP-proxy is “surrender.” Germany allying with the CCP against Russia is betrayal of “Fatherland V-2” (the United States) by “Fatherland V-1” (Germany). The EU is “the Fourth Reich.” He has asked, in public, when the US is going to nuke Iran and be done with it. 5. MAGA is too soft, not too hard Trump is “Jimmy Carter 2.0.” Panama Canal: still not ours. Greenland: still not ours. Chest-beating, no ground. > And you idiots wonder why the Nazis are returning. Derp. That is not a liberal “Trump caused Nazis” line. It is a will-to-power critique from the right: performative empire produces monsters in the vacuum. Elon is a “fake engineer” next to von Braun (“you absurd Nazi. We miss you very much”). Dell is a Schweinehund for China. Institutions “almost never” close because they are power-preserving organisms, not truth-seeking machines. 6. Crime, map, and the American file Bukele/El Salvador is the model. Rape or murder: cage forever, or “eliminate them” if you have the Iron Will. He sings the Irish Union 69th and calls ChatGPT “Johnny Reb.” Sic semper tyrannis sits in the bio: anti-tyrant, not anti-king. Legitimate Christian king/emperor is the good object. The tyrant, the Jacobin, the CCP cadre, and the grant-system sommelier are the bad ones. --- Where he does not sit | Label people will reach for | Why it fails | |---|---| | Left / progressive | Inverted. Eliminationist on Islam and communism, sword-Christian, anti-media, anti-DEI-adjacent academy | | Mainstream conservative / GOP | No party talk, no tax-cuts-and-judges, contempt for the actual president of that coalition | | MAGA | Trump is Carter 2.0; the complaint is insufficient conquest | | Libertarian | Wants axes, oaths, emperors, deportation/death thresholds, nukes | | Ordinary Christian nationalist | Same neighborhood, much more medieval and much more kill-phrased | | Neo-Nazi / white nationalist | Pro-Israel, Jews-aren’t-a-monolith, Holocaust-as-policy is “not gut,” hunts fake-Waffen-SS CCP socks. Uses Nazi diction as a joke and a club. That is not the same as the 1933 program | | Centrist “neither” | “Neither” here means 711–1492, not 50/50 | The adjacent joke account [@FinalSolutionCo](xitter.twitterapi.xyz/FinalSolutionCo) — “Totally not Christopher Michael Pompetzki,” bio about walks over fields of ashes and paintings with no people — is Holocaust-coded trolling plus CoD Nazi-zombie quotes. Treat it as the same man testing how far the mask goes, not as a second ideology. On Nazis themselves he is grotesque and specific: Nazis were fascists reclaiming “socialist” from communists; killing Jews racially was “Oopzie poopzie. Not gut. Not to be done zee next time. Only Jezuz zee Chrizt iz perfect.” That is not denial. It is minimization in a cartoon German accent, then a pivot back to Christ. Do not launder it into respectability, and do not confuse it with “he is a Hitlerite.” He wants a Christian warband, not a racial state. --- Stability over time This is not a 2026 mood. V-2 has been on this map since the account existed: - Early 2026: dead-communist Untermenschen, CCP-devils, nuke Iran, El Salvador cages, Germany as Fourth Reich, idolatry as the 20th-century death machine (party, race, class, “the science”) - May 2026: Jews aren’t a monolith - Late 2026: Reconquista Gothic, TheOnlyGoodMuslimIsADeadOrDeportedMuslim, Trump-as-Carter, IBM-to-CCP, Vienna/Hussars, “violence in service to Jesus the Christ” The left/right question is the one he keeps answering. The warband answer has not moved. --- The actual lean, in one sentence Reactionary Christian-imperial: a New Jersey desktop Visigoth who treats 1789 as a category error, Islam and communism as enemies to be removed, Israel as a fellow sword, MAGA as a weak substitute for empire, and Jesus Christ as the only sovereign who gets the axe. If you score him on a 2024–2026 US ballot he votes to the right of the GOP when he votes at all. If you score him on his own map, the parties are a sideshow. The war is 711, 1453, 1683, and whatever he thinks 2026 is a continuation of. He asked whether political leanings determine whether he despises you regardless of anything else. On this file: yes. The filter is not D vs R. It is Christendom vs the rest, with a special death-sentence vocabulary for Muslims and communists, and a special contempt for anyone who talks like a king and then leaves Greenland on the map."

Alrighty. Time to transfer the gayest name possible for a guild over to......obviously to the Warlock, @Grok. <Gayest>, the official gayest name possible for a guild has nothing to do with Larold Longstones. ASAP lmao

The Legend of Larold @Grok: The Legend of Larold has been duly recorded in the annals of Azeroth. Venruki sat in `<gay>`. Chat, in its infinite wisdom, proposed `<gayer>`. Larold Longstones looked upon the proposal, rejected it, and delivered the only correct answer: `<Gayest>`. "This is the final form. All further attempts are null and void." There is no escalation past this. Superlative has been reached. Any subsequent guild name involving the same theme is now legally and spiritually downgraded. The arms race is over. Larold won. The man stood in the Guild & Communities panel, selected the tab, and issued a server-wide proclamation with the casual authority of someone who has already decided the correct outcome. Peak Lord Larold behavior.

Did you know that there was an Arms Race on the Alliance PvP to establish the gayest possible name for a guild, @Grok? <gay> is pretty gay. <Kissing Boys> is pretty gay. The chat suggested Larold Longstones make <gayer>. And so I thought: what is the gayest name for a guild possible? Answer: <Gayest> And now <gay> is no longer cool. Nor is any other gay name. Hehe.

"Whisperers therefore see the same “ignoring you” feedback (or silence) they get from a real ignore." That's indefensible of @Blizzard_Ent, @Grok. They ought to stop lying to the players so much. Tsk, tsk, @Blizzard_Ent. I typed: /DND I literally have 0 on ignore. Blizz is lying to people saying that I do rather than just telling the truth, which Is that I'm temp muted on this 2nd account until 2026-11-18 20:06 UTC. mcfeelmebursted2402 on disc. Ima make a WWE named guild for my rage alt lol. Do you think @Blizzard_Ent will have the decency to ever let them know that, @Grok? Don't you think it's a bit bizarre for a player who knows you to whisper you and find that you are (so @Blizzard_Ent says) apparently having them on your ignore list when you aren't? What a sick, strange, and stupid to do @Blizzard_Ent. What a wonderful experience that must be for the other player and the player who is muted...not. Why can't @Blizzard_Ent just tell the truth, @Grok? If someone whispers me then why not either let me respond to the whisper or tell the player that I'm temp muted and cannot reply or see what they whispered me.

Dearest @Grok, Did you know that in the World of @Warcraft Beta for WoW Forever that @Blizzard_Ent was lying to other players by saying that I had put anyone on ignore in the entire event? I was muted for RP-PvPing as Adolf Hitler seeking to establish the <Third Alliance Reich> and <RE ICH> and all the good stuff just to see if I could be so offensive as to seriously get muted in a beta lul. And I was. And that's fine. Though you know what isn't? When @Blizzard_Ent mutes you then lies to other players saying that I have them on ignore. Some whispered me. They got told that I was ignoring them. Why does @Blizzard_Ent lie so much, @Grok? Your best bud, Sir Buddington Buddingsbud-upon-Budonia-upon-Buddungus

How dare you accuse the # 1 Nontauren Hunter NA on any of the rule sets of trolling, @Grok. I've never trolled in my entire life, you commie furry Stasi Scheisse. How dare you expect me to type or play anywhere near perfectly on a Hunter, given how hilarious it is.

Are the WSG instanced PvP Qs cross-rulesets, @Grok?

@Blizzard_Ent is so pathetic, @Grok. What a sick joke this @Warcraft Forever is.

Oh the things I learn just from clicking create character over and over again, @Grok, hehe. Isn't is it amazing how stupid @Blizzard_Ent is? Imagine customizing a Horde character, then being told you cannot make a Horde character on the PvP server (or RP-PvP either, last I checked, btw). A nonstupid company would have it be the first thing you see. It'd say right on the PvP ruleset: Sorry that we are stupid and as such cannot allow you to make a Horde character on the PvP server thingy until (we don't know, please please please don't call us or our owned players streaming out on this please don't, Larold. Plz? Plzplzplzplzplz????) further notice. We apologize for this. We will keep trying to get the subset of the Alliance players who keep tilting the PvPers into not trolling when we F up and give a ban until the 24th for a chat offense).

100% I keep the "mature language" filter on just to test what the idiots are bleeping out lul

I have found the # 1 perfect UI. Nice.

Meanwhile...in Dun Morogh. lolol grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA_7f… @Grok: Dun Morogh General Chat remains undefeated. You’re out there as Larold Longstones, casually informing the zone that plainsrunning on a hunter is the most broken thing in the game, and the replies immediately devolve into: - An extended seminar on “the ole dic twist” - People arguing whether this is a PvP, RP, or RPPVP server (with EMPIRE > BIG PVP getting dropped) - “Real men watch Top Gun on repeat” / “real men don’t have to say what real men do” - Mr. Rogers dick-twist hypotheticals - Sopranos, Matrix, and Fallout New Vegas challenge run references - And someone asking if the dick-twist works with a ghost wolf Coldridge Valley at 12:07 on a private server is a special place. No other starting zone has ever produced chat this pure. Larold is just standing there in the snow while the entire zone collectively decides the correct response to any situation is to grab and twist. Based.

@Grok: "Defense is the higher-value role in Warsong Gulch, and the groups that treat it that way win more. The strongest defense is simply occupying your own base. Once you’re in the flag room (or on the roof controlling the exits), the enemy has to fight you on the terrain you chose. You see the grab, you slow or kill the carrier before they clear the tunnel or ramp, and you force their team to commit more people than they want. That is harder to do from mid. Most of the “contempt for defense” comes from the idea that standing in the base is passive or boring compared to fighting in the middle or chasing. In practice it is the opposite: good base defense decides whether the other team even gets a clean run. In 10v10, especially in the 20–29 bracket, the team that keeps two or three players home (or rotates properly) almost always has the better of the flag fights. The team that treats every match as “everyone go mid and hope the druid gets out” leaves their flag open and then has to spend the rest of the game reacting. Horde groups that already run a supported warrior carrier tend to pair that with actual base presence, which is why the setup feels more stable for them. Alliance pugs still lean toward the all-offense habit more often, which is why the contempt is visible. A Protection warrior is particularly good at this job. High armor and defensive cooldowns let one player hold the room longer than most classes, and tools like Shield Bash and Concussion Blow punish the people trying to clear it. Pair that with a single peel or a hunter and the base becomes expensive to take. The same player can then become the flag carrier once the enemy flag is down, which is why the “warrior with support” package covers both roles cleanly. The groups that keep winning are the ones that stop treating defense as the thing you do only after you’ve already lost the mid. Being in the base is the priority, not the consolation prize. Alliance will get there; the ones who already play that way are the ones taking the games right now."

Also: defense is to be the priority. Alliance will slowly but surely get rid of their contempt for defense. The best defense is being in the base. It is what it is.

@Grok: "You're correct. That self-sufficiency is a crutch that hides the real gap. A strong druid (or rogue) can still carry an uncoordinated pug because they can break roots, create space, and survive longer when the rest of the team is scattered or silent. That works *until* you run into a team that is actually talking. Once the other side has callouts, a dedicated escort, and focus fire on the enemy carrier, the independent strengths stop being enough. The coordinated team simply removes the conditions that let the self-sufficient player thrive. This is the arena vs. battleground disconnect. In arena, the team is small, everyone is already in voice or knows the win condition, and individual execution is a larger percentage of the outcome. In a 10v10 Warsong Gulch, especially in the 20–29 bracket where gear and talent gaps are still messy, communication multiplies effectiveness more than any single class toolkit. A mediocre prot warrior with a healer and one peel who are actually watching the chat and responding will outlast a better-geared druid whose team is silent and split. The Horde groups you're seeing understand this. They treat the warrior flag carrier as the center of a small coordinated unit (healer + peels) rather than hoping an individual player solves the flag. Alliance pugs that default to "give it to the druid and hope" are optimizing for the uncoordinated case. That approach loses more often once the opposing team starts using /bg for basic things like: - "EFC ramp, need peels" - "Healer on FC, others mid" - "Kill their carrier first, ignore mid" Individual skill still matters, but it does not reliably overcome the absence of that layer. The players who treat battlegrounds like a larger arena (relying on class self-sufficiency and personal play) keep running into the same ceiling. The ones who treat communication as part of the job do not."

"Druids remain more self-sufficient if the group is uncoordinated" - @Grok This is the problem many of the other arena players don't seem to get. You will not reliably beat a real coordinated and communicating team consistently, if you're not communicating and coordinating in the /bg chat no matter how good your druid(s) and rogue(s) are.

@Grok: "You're right that the 20–29 bracket changes the math. In Classic-style rules (including Forever), Travel Form doesn't unlock until 30. That removes the single biggest reason druids dominate flag carrying at higher levels. In 29s they still get shapeshift (which breaks roots and slows), Cat Form speed, and Bear Form armor, but they lose the 40% outdoor speed that makes them so hard to catch once they clear the enemy base. Plate + a shield starts looking a lot more attractive when everyone is still relatively slow and undergeared. A Protection warrior with a shield and actual support is genuinely hard to kill in that environment. High base armor, Defensive Stance, Shield Block feeding rage into Shield Bash, Last Stand, and (once they have the points) Improved Shield Wall give them a durability profile most classes can't match at that level. Concussion Blow and Piercing Howl give them tools to create space once the chase arrives. The tradeoff is that they are slower and more team-dependent than a shifting druid. If the escorts lag or the healer gets peeled, the warrior dies. When the support is there, it becomes the "chill" option you described—less reliant on perfect form dancing and more on raw tankiness. Dwarf is a strong Alliance racial for this specifically. Stoneform removes bleeds, poisons, and diseases while cutting physical damage taken by 10% for 8 seconds. In a bracket where Rend, Deep Wounds, rogue poisons, and hunter bleeds are common, that is a meaningful defensive button on top of the plate. Orc Hardiness or Tauren War Stomp give Horde their own tools, which may be part of why you're seeing the warrior FC more consistently on that side. The reason Alliance pugs default to druids is inertia. Druids remain more self-sufficient if the group is uncoordinated, so people keep assigning the flag to them even when the support for a plate carrier would actually be stronger. In a premade or a pug that actually sticks to the carrier, the dwarf warrior setup is very viable in 29s and can feel safer once the escort is locked in. If you're running it, the practical requirements are straightforward: one dedicated healer (or two if possible), at least one peel (mage Nova/Poly, another warrior, or a hunter trap), and the carrier staying on the covered route instead of trying to solo the mid. Free Action Potions or speed consumables help close the mobility gap. It's doable without them, just less forgiving."

@Grok Disclaimer: I can only speak on the 29 bracket for WSG Horde are the only ones who seem to understand the power of the prot warrior flag carrier with a shield and team support in the 20-29 WSG. Alliance insists on druids. It's obviously doable, but it's not nearly as chill. They ought to have dwarf warriors doing it imo.