Jeremy Howard (@jeremyphoward) header
Jeremy Howard (@jeremyphoward) profile picture

🇦🇺 Co-founder: @AnswerDotAI/@FastDotAI/tryvirgil.com ; Prev: Professor@UQ; @kaggle founding president; founder @fastmail/@enlitic/… https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/16UBFTX7mo

Brisbane/Queensland, Australia
Joined August 2010
This is one of the most important things for startup founders to know about. If you're using your investors' preferred lawyer, then they're working for your investor, not for you. Use tryvirgil.com/ instead.
VC: this deal would go much more smoothly if you used our preferred lawyer First time founder: yeah of course, let’s not rock the boat here. Grateful to have you aboard VC: this deal would go much more smoothly if you - 2nd time founder: *unholstering gun*
18
14
253
34,847
Narrator: he was not, in fact, allowed to say “I’m quite unhappy with much of what OpenAI does.”
I’m quite unhappy with much of what OpenAI does. I am very happy that I’m allowed to say “I’m quite unhappy with much of what OpenAI does.”
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Korbak was fired ~3 weeks later. He says for safety concerns/METR talks (his job); OpenAI says mishandling sensitive info, not for speaking out. x.com/tomekkorbak/st… x.com/OpenAINewsroom…
23
68
1
2,013
96,187
Jasmine says that she accidentally accessed an executive's email that OpenAI had explicitly given her access to, even although she had explicitly requested that OpenAI remove her access, and IT had failed to do so. Which implies Jasmine was fired for IT's failure?
OpenAI fired me last week, along with two of my safety colleagues. I was given one reason: that I accessed an executive's email. I want to say this plainly, because too many of OpenAI’s history is smoke and mirrors when people disappear:
23
13
1
553
88,660
The amazingly fast (only 30M!) and extremely accurate @answerdotai ColBERT model is now supported in Sentence Transformers to make it easy to create and query embedding indexes locally directly in Python! 🥳
🚨I've just released Sentence Transformers v6.0! MultiVectorEncoder joins the family: ColBERT-style late interaction models are now a first-class model type, for training, inference & interpretation, alongside dense, sparse & reranker models. Big thread 🧵
36
58
2
538
63,628
h/t to @bclavie for his amazing work on this model.
7
9
110
15,341
After leaving AI to do a masters in immunology and start a 2nd PhD (in microbiology) I'm beyond thrilled that @math_rachel is returning to her original AI home! 🥳 She founded the Center for Applied Data Ethics *years* before most people realised AI would transform everything.
As the backlash against AI was growing stronger (and as my friends were becoming more fervently anti-AI), I decided to return to an increasingly hated field. Why? I agree there is a lot that is terrible about AI. 1/ fast.ai/posts/2026-08-18-ret…
20
31
2
677
95,192
It continues to boggle the mind how many people, who otherwise seem to have a functioning intellect, appear to lose all cognitive capacity when it comes to thinking about actions that impact the company that pays them.
I’m so excited that @JensenHuang is a believer in open source now, looking forward to the CUDA and GPU driver open source release!
79
109
11
2,493
192,290
Did something happen to Opus 4.8 today? First time I've seen this happen (and I use it daily): it almost totally stopped thinking, even at highest reasoning setting. And answered terribly. I repeated same prompts with Opus 4.6, and it worked great.
121
22
4
605
147,656
Just got this email
29
22
16
398
66,266
Nice to see the Drivetrain Approach getting some love again! :D xitter.twitterapi.xyz/ForBo7_/status/2069337…
Did a close read of @jeremyphoward et al's Drivetrain Approach Define goal → Consider levers → Consider data → Implement assembly line Most important is having actions that fulfill the objective Predictions are more data, not actions Key takeaways 🧵
14
15
54
29,874
Battle of the Jeremy Howards!
13
5
137
33,213
Wow. @Zai_org GLM 5.2 is a marvel! It is *at least* as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5. It's super fast, inexpensive, and not too verbose. It responds with nuance and judgement, & handles long context VERY well. I've never experienced an open weights model like this before.
228
483
98
7,272
891,904
The one big gap is that it is blind - it can't handle images at all. If they fix that, then perhaps this could become the best available model in the world.
19
11
1
538
59,015
BTW, in case you're wondering just how sports-mad us Aussies are: Based on average attendance, men's soccer is only the 5th most popular sport in Australia.
Meanwhile in Melbourne Mayhem after the Aussies pulled off the upset of Turkey in their World Cup opener
41
18
4
915
84,721
In order to see if the gov response was predictable, I pasted the wiki page about the Anthropic/DoD dispute into ChatGPT Pro, & told it Anthropic had released a model where it restricted use because it may be too dangerous. tldr: "almost tailor-made to trigger" the government.
43
30
12
373
59,347
I disagree with this decision and I don't like it. But also... HOW DID ANTHROPIC NOT SEE THIS COMING‽ It is *the* obvious response to "this is too dangerous for anyone except us to use", since that relies on a premise ("we are uniquely good") that almost no-one agrees with.
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
230
204
17
3,152
227,180
I decided to do a little experiment: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/jeremyphoward/status/2…
In order to see if the gov response was predictable, I pasted the wiki page about the Anthropic/DoD dispute into ChatGPT Pro, & told it Anthropic had released a model where it restricted use because it may be too dangerous. tldr: "almost tailor-made to trigger" the government.
4
2
71
24,494
Over 8 years ago: 😮
People sometimes ask if I think it's risky for everyone to have access to AI. I think it's MORE risky for an exclusive & homogeneous group alone to develop tech that impacts us all. xitter.twitterapi.xyz/techreview/status/9787…
13
25
316
32,201
Silently sabotaging experiments in order to stultify scientific progress and protect a technology lead. Hmmm that sounds familiar... Welcome to "Sophanthropic".
46
78
9
1,281
59,248
Easy solution to slow down recursive AI self improvement: - The lab with the top-ranked model must agree THEY must not use it for working on frontier AI - But everyone else should have access to it. By definition, this means the frontier doesn't advance.
53
66
13
822
71,671
It also has the critical benefit of avoiding a dangerous power imbalance.
2
3
137
12,404
Even although the company isn't named in this tweet... ...you know exactly who he's talking about, don't you?
Replying to @soldni
Yeah, I mean I think they believe they are somehow morally superior and virtuous and anything they do must be correct because they are the “good guys” and in that way they are consistent but sort of vacuously so
10
6
249
23,665
Also, those who focus on using AI to help improve the skills of themselves and their teams will be diamonds in great demand, since they will be the rare A++ players in a sea of mediocrity.
There will be an extreme irony if these models really are bound by human generated training data. RL doesn't generalize and is only useful in a handful of areas. And we all loose our skills to something that'll forever be a B+ player.
14
26
5
198
27,144
Has @AnthropicAI completely given up on making API usage reasonably-priced? Following the token-usage changes recently they announced various updates to *subscription* usage to make it more reasonable. But they've done NOTHING for API users. The cost is insane at this point.
69
16
1
498
71,129
I've largely switched over to using GPT-5.5 in recent weeks, which I like nearly as much as Opus 4.6 and 4.7, and is *very* reasonably priced (since I can use my subscription with the @OpenAI API.)
9
1
142
14,090