Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni) header
Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni) profile picture

Science Communicator Outreach Coordinator @Longevity_IISc | Previously at @ncbs_bangalore Just talking to myself here atp

Bengaluru, India
Joined October 2015
Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)Photo by Mrunal Kulkarni (@mrunalnkulkarni)
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
nobody draws their life on youtube anymore
196
13,295
349
170,573
1,376,028
thinking about the time when at a major science festival i asked the founder who he was
106
its been over a year since google changed its app icons and i still end up opening the wrong apps because THEY ALL LOOK THE SAME
79
New job, new life, new house ( thanks to blr landlords) New is good. But when all new things happen at the same time it fucks you up I have been exhausted for the past 6 months straight. Excited, but exhausted. how to take a break from life?
128
Congratulations to the 2026 winners of the National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications (@SciCommAwards) given by @theNASEM in partnership with @schmidtsciences! Learn more about the winners: ow.ly/cJmh51011rI
11
1
54
5,573
I need all the AI people to stop saying "biology" when they mean "medicine" or "drug development"
30
74
8
753
34,407
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
AI deep research reviews dozens of sources and writes a structured report. Yet the most trustworthy sources, like peer-reviewed journals, are off-limits to it: they cost money ↓

23
64
3
294
1,341,742
It's been 5 years since I graduated and I still get emails from NPTEL
1
120
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
The em dash vanished from machine text because it annoyed readers, and from human text because writers kept getting mistaken for bots. Now the detector punishes the human for writing like a machine and rewards the machine for writing like a human ↓

36
254
20
1,721
2,861,880
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
Science communicators spend a lot of time trying to get people to engage with their content. We wrote about why comment sections might be one of the most overlooked spaces for science communication, and how to participate without a science lesson. ow.ly/qrre50ZY9Yi
2
1
187
where is my AI milk
insufrible modernidad en la que a todo le agregan proteína o un agente de ia
1
82
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
insufrible modernidad en la que a todo le agregan proteína o un agente de ia
22
1,272
36
7,064
79,026
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
the quiet intimacy of two people viewing a google doc at the same time
76
3,383
278
36,469
419,937
how do working professionals not know to 'reply all' when writing to different teams?! you reply only to me and then i have to fwd your email to the rest of the team and now the email thread is all messed up ugh
1
141
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
خسته شدم از بس توی ریسرچ و کارهام از AI استفاده کردم. حس می‌کنم همه چی داره سطحی و مصنوعی می‌شه. انقدر بهش وابسته شدم که انگار سهم خودم، فکر کردنم و خلاقیتم توی کارهام داره کم‌رنگ می‌شه. نمی‌تونم هم بذارمش کنار، چون کند می‌شم و از بقیه‌ که دارن ازش استفاده می‌کنن عقب می‌مونم.
52
79
11
1,623
45,155
cutting edge this, cutting edge that, how about you cut a cake and chill instead of labelling every mid idea as cutting edge
2
89
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
it's biotech for a reason, and not techbio all the folks who recently started working with biology and biologists, please understand, biology is slow and there's a good freaking reason for it. living systems are complex. experiments fail cuz tons of unpredictable variables.
10
89
7
636
14,675
Mrunal Kulkarni retweeted
1. CRISPR came from basic research on bacteria. 2. Optogenetics started with a discovery in algae. 3. The GFP protein comes from jellyfish. The biggest breakthroughs all trace to scientists follow their curiosity. This is one huge reason why we must keep funding basic research!
52
881
61
4,030
106,084