muliya

How much can i pay to make u my boyfriend

Stop sending fake number

I had the opportunity to meet with Prime Minister @CMShehbaz on the margins of #UNGA to discuss Pakistan's reforms. Strong implementation has helped preserve stability, restore confidence & regain market access. Continued reforms will help lift growth & improve people's lives.

Deeply saddened by the passing of Idrus Ibrahim, eldest brother of PM @anwaribrahim. My heartfelt condolences and prayers are with my brother Anwar Ibrahim and his family. May Allah SWT grant the departed soul a place in Jannah and patience to the bereaved family. Ameen. إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون

Urząd pracy w Żywcu dając 19.998 zł aktywizował ,, bezrobotnego" który od 452 dni wykorzystywał już Kononowicza produkując patotreści na YouTube, pieniądze dostał na firmę Sorfay, na którą rozliczał dochód z kanału. Oczywiście do tego też ulgi ZUS. Na marginesie dodam, że istniała już wtedy firma o tej samej nazwie Sorfay, należąca do żony patostreamera

Ostatnio algorytm YouTube uparcie podsyła mi materiały o prowadzeniu Żabki. I im więcej tego oglądam, tym bardziej fascynuje mnie ten model biznesowy. Z jednej strony ajenci opowiadają o zarobkach rzędu 15-20 tys zł miesięcznie. Z drugiej są historie ludzi, którzy pracują po kilkanaście godzin dziennie 7 dni w tygodniu, żeby na koniec miesiąca w ogóle coś zostało. Ale najbardziej zastanawiają mnie Żabki, które zmieniają ajentów jak rękawiczki. Znam punkty, które w ciągu kilku lat miały już czwartego czy piątego ajenta. Jeden rezygnuje, przychodzi następny i tak w kółko. Tutaj czegoś nie rozumiem. Jeżeli przede mną ten sam sklep prowadziły cztery osoby i każda zrezygnowała, to co miałoby mnie przekonać, że akurat ja odkryję sposób na jego rentowność? Zwłaszcza że ajent nie ma pełnej swobody prowadzenia biznesu. O większości kluczowych rzeczach decyduje sieć. Skąd więc biorą się chętni żeby poprowadzić sklep w słabej lokalizacji? Naprawdę jestem ciekawy odpowiedzi obecnych i byłych ajentów Żabki. Co sprawia, że ktoś patrzy na punkt, z którego zrezygnowało już kilka osób, i myśli: wezmę to, uda mi się! Czy ktos może mi wyjaśnić ten fenomen?

Keeping the workspace around without keeping the sandbox alive solves a pretty annoying problem👌

I'm happy to announce that I've joined Hugging Face. What started as a personal project back in February is now something I get to work on full time. Local AI has grown explosively this year. I've said this since the early oMLX releases: I want my friend who bought a MacBook yesterday to be able to run AI on it today. I believe MLX has that potential. Apple Silicon is the easiest entry point for a regular person to get started with AI, with no complicated hardware to assemble. And the open source community, including Hugging Face, has been growing that potential. That support has already made a huge difference. Hugging Face is the best place for me to support oMLX and the MLX community with everything I have. For anyone getting into local AI, the first step usually starts at Hugging Face. Mine did too. I'm proud that I get to work at that entry point, where new ideas can be tried out. oMLX stays exactly where it is, under the same Apache 2.0 license in the same repository, and I'll keep leading the project, same as before. What changes is that I can now spend far more time on it, move faster, and build something sustainable for the long term together with all the contributors who have put so much into it. I also want to do more for MLX as a whole. oMLX is built on top of transformers, mlx-lm, mlx-vlm and the rest of the ecosystem, and I'm grateful to the people behind them. Rather than keeping everything inside oMLX, over time I want to push work upstream where it makes sense. And where the community needs something that doesn't exist yet, oMLX is a good place to try it first. Thank you to the 264 contributors who have built oMLX with me, and to everyone who filed issues with detailed logs and reproductions so we could fix things. oMLX would not be what it is without you. oMLX continues in the same place, in the same way. Just much faster. HF's announcement: huggingface.co/blog/omlx

The challenges before world leaders at the General Assembly: Will humanity govern power wisely? Will we uphold the law before impunity becomes normalized? Will we end wars before they consume generations? Will we tackle inequality before societies fracture? Will we accelerate climate action before tipping points are crossed? Will we governing AI before it governs us? My message to #UNGA: un.org/sg/en/content/sg/stat…

Software will never die again. You liked Google Reader? Cool, you can generate and deploy your own. Yours, forever.

Spacefast DNS will be a bit slower than the orange cloud for now, but it's still going to be #3 fastest in the world oh man i can't wait to roll this stuff out

AI will take everyone’s jobs. ... until they invent new ones. AI alone probably won’t take your job. But someone using AI might. So you should lean in to AI. People react to new technologies in three ways: 1. The Resisters: "AI is ruining everything!" 2. The Ignorers: “I don’t understand AI.” 3. The Adopters: "How can I use this to get better?" It's not AI vs. humans. It's humans with AI vs. humans without AI. We’re not cutting our team because of AI. We’re GROWING it. Our team with AI can accomplish 10x more than our team without it. Businesses without websites died in the 90s. Same thing is happening now. If you're not experimenting with AI in your industry, someone else is. And they're going to serve your customers better. Faster. Cheaper. The buggy whip makers of the 1800s became car mechanics. They pivoted or perished. Which camp are you in?

87 million lives. I hosted event at Goals House to ask media and content gurus how we get our message through to a distracted and anxious public. We need a solidarity movement.

The YC Early Access Network is filling up fast. On Oct 22, tech leaders from high-growth startups to the Fortune 500 meet the best companies building enterprise AI. Be in the room. Request one of the remaining spots in Early Access now. events.ycombinator.com/yc-ea…

The reason money motivated people make for bad venture backed founders is precisely because they have not actually internalized this truth about the nature of venture. Failure does not mean walking with nothing, it means taking the $30,$50 or $100MM personal liquid stake you have in hand and betting double or nothing on it over and over to have a slim chance at it becoming $10bn. It’s a bet no person who’s in it to be rich would take. It’s only those who are in it for status, glory and power.