Cred (@red_hursh) header
Cred (@red_hursh) profile picture
Joined December 2021
Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)Photo by Cred (@red_hursh)
The constitution and just plain common sense prevail.
🚨 SCOTUS just vacated a 10th Circuit ruling that favored a trans inmate suing for access to a women’s jail unit and female undergarments. Backed by Trump’s DOJ, the Supreme Court sent the case back, citing precedents that uphold biological realities in law. Major victory for common sense in our prison systems! 🏛️⚖️
8
This. Pure evil. 👇👇
DISGUSTING: Today, Democrats should be celebrating Veteran's Day and honoring those who served our country. Instead, 23 Democrat AGs are suing to force VA hospitals and clinics to kill babies in abortions.
6
This.
Superb salvo back from White House Counsel Will Scharf. The lesson learned from Bill Clinton’s ear is to battle everything from day one. Scharf has set up potential rejections of Congressional subpoenas with this letter.
11
Democrats are pure evil.
OPINION: The Democratic Party is facing a defining moral crisis over its soul and its relationship with the Jewish community, forcing a choice between purging its increasingly hostile radical wing or splitting entirely. bit.ly/48f2K5a
7
This. Beware Democrats.
The White House Counsel's Office has now put the incoming Oversight Chair on written notice, and the letter goes straight to the controlling law. Quoting the Supreme Court in Watkins, investigations "conducted solely for the personal aggrandizement of the investigators or to 'punish' those investigated are indefensible." Congress, it says, cannot use investigations "to exercise powers of criminal prosecution assigned to the Executive and the Judiciary." That is the heart of what I've been calling Silly Subpoena Season. "Lawyer up" is not the language of legislating. It's the language of a unchecked prosecutor. And when members brag about handing out subpoenas like "candy" and "Mardi Gras beads," as the letter notes, they are building the record a court will read later when it asks whether a subpoena serves a valid legislative purpose. Mazars tells courts to look hard at exactly that, and at breadth, when Congress comes after the President's information. Don't misread the letter as a refusal to deal. It's the opening move in the accommodation process, which is the Constitution's actual structural answer here. Name the legislation you're considering, tailor the request to it, and negotiate. If that fails, the fight belongs in a civil case. What it doesn't belong in is a grand jury. That's why Licavoli has to go and why the Navarro case matters now. Oversight is a serious constitutional power. A subpoena is a tool for legislating, not a party favor or a frivolous festival bead. @RealPNavarro
5
Yes!! 👏👏👏
This quoted post is unavailable.
18
Truth.
Some actual truth as we watch cowards trying to tear down the man protecting our military from becoming yet another politicized, Deep State tool.
13
This. 👇👇
Iran’s navy is at the bottom of the Gulf. The Houthis quit. Maduro got picked up in 48 minutes. Massie’s response is to impeach the guy who did it. Most Secretaries get criticized for losing wars. Hegseth’s getting impeached for winning them.
12
Buyers remorse will set in early in 2027 for sure.
Those formerly Republican states that just voted in a slate of liberal Democrats to statewide office will be in for quite a shock if leftist policies actually get enacted.
14
This. Democrats are simply evil people.
Rep. Jason Crow (D., Co.) just told Martha McCallum that the impeachment of Hegseth is "not really about impeachment" but rather just a desire to remove him. He said that this is just another means. That is precisely what the Framers did not want impeachment to become...
11
Massie failed again. Good riddance. He can’t be gone soon enough.
Has Pete Hegseth committed impeachable crimes? The question is absurd and the answer is: obviously not. Like so much of Congress, impeachment has become a ridiculous show that stands in for actual policymaking. Congress has so many tools for registering its policy disagreements. Rather than use them, they're going to try to impeach Pete Hegseth. They did the same to Donald Trump. Legislation is hard. Impeachments are easy (and ultimately, inconsequential). The irony is that legislators are most angry at Pete on the issues where he's most correct: repositioning forces away from Europe/Ukraine and reorganizing the general officer corps. This isn't about Iran, this is about the fact that Pete took on the bureaucracy at the Pentagon.
9
More of this. Speed it up.
Yesterday, @ICEGov arrested more worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens, convicted for despicable crimes including second-degree murder, sexual assault, and controlled substance trafficking. We will continue to carry out the American people’s mandate to arrest and deport illegal aliens like these from our nation. 🧵
12
Funny how that happened. Go figure.
It's almost as if the economy was doing just fine and everyone knew it but had to pretend otherwise for the midterms 🤔
1
33
This.
🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth EXCORIATES Thomas Massie for pushing his impeachment right as Veterans Day is tomorrow "Their service was was NOT a crime. These are HEROES and no politician in Washington will tell them otherwise while I hold this office!" 🇺🇸 "They answered the call. They executed. They won. And on the eve of Veterans Day, these resolutions tell every one of them that their service was a CRIME!" 🎯 Gee, I wonder why morale and recruitment is soaring. They went after Pete since day one and this time will be no different!
13