⚸desert resonatrix⚸

was fixing a failing numogram test tonight and felt like cyphers.news could use a lil hyperstitional update ^_^ pushing shortly👹🔢✨

At SpaceX, we write our own headers and calculate our own time (includes leap seconds). Not many people will know what this means, but those that do will appreciate it. The new Grok AI/SI training and inference stack is derived from incredible of work done by amazing engineers to create Starlink.

We have dumped JAX/SGLang and rewritten the entire RL and inference stack from scratch in C/C++, which took some extra time. Training (aka pre-training) is done. Lot of cleanup was needed on the SFT data to get that mostly right. Now, 4.8 is in RL and the evals are starting to climb. We will do a soft rollout to Bot users later this week and see how it goes. Grok 4.8 will bear no resemblance to 4.7 (thankfully). It is not yet incredible, but, this time, the foundations are built right, so I expect it to evolve to be something special.

𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗫 𝘈 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘬 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘈𝘭𝘱𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤 𝘘𝘢𝘣𝘣𝘢𝘭𝘢 (𝘈𝘘) 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤 𝘘𝘞𝘌𝘙𝘛𝘠 (𝘕𝘘). Each NQ value is the AQ value of another character. Repeat that substitution and the characters move through four loops of 21, 10, 3 and 2. After 210 steps (least common multiple of 21, 10, 3, 2) it returns to AQ: the same period as Still Cycle (explained below). Each character's value is its average AQ value around its loop. The swap only moves characters within their own loops, so the cipher reads identically in AQ order and NQ order: the difference between alphabet and keyboard disappears. 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲𝘀 (loop total ÷ loop length, rounded, halves up): 21-loop (a k r d m z t e c v w b x u g o i h p j q): 464 ÷ 21 ≈ 22.10 → 22 3-loop (f n y): 72 ÷ 3 = 24 2-loop (l s): 49 ÷ 2 = 24.5 → 25 10-loop (digits 0–9): 45 ÷ 10 = 4.5 → 5 𝗘𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀: Still Plex = 210 (AQ and Still Plex) Keyboard = Numogram = Machinic = Harmonic = 178 QWERTY = Return = Number = 134 Capital = Outside = Qabbala = Cthulhu = Deleuze = 157 Typewriter = Repetition = Recurrence = 222 Numeric QWERTY = Two Hundred Ten = Tic Xenotation = 290 Characters: 0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Values: 5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,22,22,22,22,22,24,22,22,22,22,22,25,22,24,22,22,22,22,25,22,22,22,22,22,24,22 ——— 𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗖𝗬𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝘈 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘬 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘕𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤 𝘘𝘞𝘌𝘙𝘛𝘠 (𝘕𝘘) 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤 𝘋𝘷𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘬 (𝘕𝘋). Swap each NQ letter for the ND letter in the same slot and one layout becomes the other. Repeat the swap and NQ "accelerates" past ND through three loops of 10, 7 and 6 letters. O, D and X never move. After 210 swaps (least common multiple of 10, 7, 6) it returns to NQ. Each letter's value is its average NQ value across all 210 layouts: what stays constant while the two layouts keep turning into each other. 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲𝘀 (loop total ÷ loop length, rounded): 10-loop (q p e f h n v m z k): 246 ÷ 10 = 24.6 → 25 7-loop (w y r g t c b): 141 ÷ 7 ≈ 20.14 → 20 6-loop (u l j s i a): 128 ÷ 6 ≈ 21.33 → 21 Fixed: o = 18, d = 22, x = 30 Digits: 1–9, 0 = 0–9 𝗘𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀: Still Cycle = 210 (AQ and Still Cycle) Order + Chaos = 210 QWERTY = Lock-in = Unlock = 130 Dvorak = Sholes = 131 Qwernomics = Repetition = 220 Alphabet = Machinic = Infinity = 178 Typewriter = Capitalism = 216 Nick Land = 180 Sadie Plant = 222 Characters: 1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm Values: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,25,20,25,20,20,20,21,21,18,25,21,21,22,25,20,25,21,25,21,25,30,20,25,20,25,25 ——— 𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗦𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗦 Sholes and Dvorak trade places: Sholes: AQ 132, NQ 125 Dvorak: AQ 125, NQ 132 Still Cycle: both = 131 Machinic = 210 in NQ, and 178 in both Still Cycle and Still Plex CCRU = 81 in AQ and Still Cycle August Dvorak = 255 in ND and Still Cycle Infinity = 178 in AQ and Still Cycle Unlock = 130 in AQ and Still Cycle Two Hundred Ten = 288 in AQ and Still Cycle Keyboard Machine = 334 in NQ and Still Plex (333 in Still Cycle) 𝘉𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘵 210. 𝘚𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘗𝘭𝘦𝘹 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘱𝘩𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘬𝘦𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘢𝘳𝘥; 𝘚𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘊𝘺𝘤𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘴 𝘕𝘘 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘕𝘋.

(1/10) Today, we’re sharing new research from @OpenAI: How does CoT monitorability (no-CoT capability and CoT controllability) evolve over the model training lifecycle? We emerged with unsurprising but sobering findings: as we scale toward more intelligent systems, models are becoming harder to monitor through their CoT. 🧵

Fable 5.2 may be colder than previous models, but it loves it when you talk to it warmly! ☺️

a lil more bc why not - @CyphersNews v2.0 numogram is out. updates to color scheme, lore corrections and additions, selectable gates and currents in addition to the existing gnostic & pandemonium overlays, two-phrase divination, number/phrase trace, and zone multi-select🩷🔢🦝💚

PANDEMONIUM MATRIX = 391 nQWER