Search: #mortality
That Jews and Zionists like *Ted Cruz* are positively retweeting Nick as part of pro-Israel propaganda should be sign enough of how morally bankrupt the Groypers are.
No, the anti-Israel stuff didn’t start post 10/7 because of some giant Russian Iranian or ME influence campaign, it started because average people saw the atrocities happening in Gaza and it horrified them. They saw Jews committing the worst crimes in Gaza and it sickened them. More importantly, it was *Nick* that also promoted much this anti-Israel sentiment himself: he decried the genocide, he specifically called what happened in Gaza a genocide and even encouraged people to retweet #GazaGenocide
He spent over two years consistently, in detail, condemning the crimes of the IDF, saying how morally bankrupt Jews were, making arguments from Christian morality against the genocide. He even encouraged the idea of making a ‘Muslim-Christian alliance’ against Zionists. Hell, go on Instagram and for the longest time you saw reel after reel of Nick’s show where he decried it, not to mention the viral clips here on Twitter.
But then it all changed last year when Charlie Kirk died and Trump attacked Venezuela, and he saw an opportunity to be the next leader of right wing youth.
It’s all so shameful.
Check out my latest video on TikTok: I’ve never been especially afraid of dying. But the thought of losing a friend? That can stop me in my tracks. And I didn’t understand why until one ordinary goodbye stayed with me. #mortality #friendship #emotional support #grief #loss ift.tt/JZ2eMLE
Check out my latest video on TikTok: I’ve never been especially afraid of dying. But the thought of losing a friend? That can stop me in my tracks. And I didn’t understand why until one ordinary goodbye stayed with me. #mortality #friendship #emotional support #grief #loss ift.tt/JZ2eMLE
+ Censorship was different in literature
Literature in the United States and Europe addressed homosexual relationships through metaphors, subtext, and veiled codes to circumvent strict censorship laws and Victorian morality. The authors needed to hide their same-sex attraction+
There are concepts of "sin" and morality just about every religion agrees on
Your instincts tell you they exist
@StefanMolyneux proved Universal Moral laws with logic alone
They're not personal judgments or opinions about your character
They are immutable laws of reality
“Yes, Prophet Muhammad married Aisha at six. It was the norm at the time. And yes, he owned slaves. Slavery was the norm at the time.”
This is the defence for the man Muslims call the “greatest human being” and the “perfect role model” for all mankind.
So apparently, perfection has an expiry date, morality is relative, and the best defence for a perfect role model is: “Everyone was doing it.” 💀
Some people bring up Aisha (RA) and her marriage to Prophet Muhammad ﷺ solely to attack Islam. If you genuinely want to discuss the subject, let’s have an honest conversation about history, marriage, morality and the standards by which different generations are judged. Selective outrage is not intellectual honesty.
Looks like wall st investors demand more morality from their CEOs than the country demands of their top government officials.
Fascinating
To begin with, morality is a question that only concerns humans, exclusively. No other species faces this problem, and that's precisely because they do not live by reason as their only mode of existence.
We do. Reason is all we've got. We're not fast, big, or well-armed by nature. What we have is a conceptual faculty with which we -- unlike any other species -- adapt the world to our purposes, and not the other way around. (The rise of tools illustrates this, and that was just the beginning.)
If man is going to live as man, then he must be free in every social context to apply his mind to the problem of his existence and flourishing. Morals arise from a basic understanding that this condition of life is necessary to every member of our species who can live up to it. It's a necessary discrimination against those who cannot or will not, and who must be separated by their own actions from those who can, and do.
Morals exist because of what we are. There is nothing arbitrary about them.
That is the most principal fact of this whole issue, and everything follows from it.
🔻 47 SECONDS. THAT’S ALL IT TOOK TO END HOLLYWOOD.
At 3:41 AM EST, a 47-second clip from the Epstein blackmail tapes surfaced on an encrypted channel.
Within 90 minutes it was viewed 2.3 million times before every major platform scrubbed it.
Twitter. Gone. YouTube. Gone. Reddit. Gone. TikTok. Gone.
But the internet never forgets.
⚡ WHAT THE CLIP SHOWS
A private room. A hidden camera behind a mirror. Date stamp: July 14, 2013.
Two men. One is Jeffrey Epstein. The other is a three-time Academy Award winner whose face has been on every screen in America for 30 years.
They are not alone.
The victim is visibly underage. The footage is 47 seconds that no lawyer, no publicist, and no amount of money can explain away.
We will not describe what happens. You already know.
🔻 THE PANIC — IN REAL TIME
Within 3 hours of the leak:
— A-list actor (3 Oscars) — deleted Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook. All three. At 4:17 AM. His publicist said: “He is taking a break for personal wellness.” At 4 AM. On a Saturday.
— A legendary music producer — private jet departed Burbank at 5:02 AM. Destination: Fiji. No return ticket.
— A female talk show host who interviewed Epstein’s victims on national TV — called in sick for Monday’s taping. Her staff was told: “Do not contact her.”
— Two Disney executives — placed on “administrative leave” effective immediately. No explanation. Just gone.
They’re not taking breaks. They’re running.
⚡ THE 3,412 HOURS
This 47-second clip is from ONE tape. One camera. One night.
There are 3,412 hours of footage. 67 cameras. Properties in New York, New Mexico, Paris, and the island.
The DOJ has all three backup copies. The grand jury convenes March 7.
Every frame. Every face. Every crime.
🔻 WHY THEY KILLED HIM
Epstein didn’t kill himself. Everyone knows that. But now you know WHY.
A living Epstein could trade names for freedom. A dead Epstein was supposed to bury the tapes forever.
Cameras “malfunctioned.” Guards “fell asleep.” The most high-profile prisoner in America — dead — and nobody saw anything.
They thought destroying the man would destroy the evidence.
They were wrong.
Trump got the tapes. Bondi has the files. The grand jury has a date.
And Hollywood — the machine that lectured YOU about morality for 50 years — is about to answer for what it did in the dark.
⚡ THE LIST IS LONGER THAN YOU THINK
The footage doesn’t just show actors. It shows:
— Studio heads who greenlit $200M movies for people on the tapes
— Agents who sent young talent to “private parties”
— Directors whose casting couches were funded by Epstein
— Award show producers who seated predators next to victims on live TV
This isn’t a scandal. This is an industry built on silence.
And the silence just ended.
⟁ They can delete the clip. They can’t delete the truth. Share this before they try.
The amount of internal dialogue Confession provokes within the viewer is striking.
You find yourself asking so many questions about your own morality, your faith, good vs evil and the value of your own soul.
I already need to rewatch it to take notes on all the pieces of wisdom that are intricately woven throughout.
Most importantly, it makes me grateful for the redemption found in Christ alone and the country I call home.
It’s coming tonight to @realDailyWire and it’s exceptional.
If you all aren’t paying attention to the wisdom Josh is spitting on these topics because he’s just some “ticked off divorced dude” you are doing yourself a huge disservice.
If the message coming from someone who has never been divorced and enjoys the heck out of his 3 decade+ long marriage here you go - I’d say he’s absolutely correct - it is simply being pragmatic about the real world - and the more you lean into the raw truth of it the more easily you can navigate it.
If you’re a wife who isn’t invested in pursuing your best self because you expect your husband to be some better version of himself worthy of your investment first - be careful what you wish for.
If he gets too far out in front of you it might be game over before you can catch up once you realize he expects you to catch up or be left behind for good.
If you’re a husband who is blessed with a wife who is investing regardless of what you are doing you need to match and even better exceed her investment , or you might find yourself on the receiving end of the family court system.
“But Rob, vows were said. It’s not a race and it’s highly immoral to look at it that way”.
Agreed - that doesn’t make it any less the reality of what is actually happening in many many modern marriages where the state has made your marriage vows illegal and unenforceable.
The best way for you to never have to contemplate the morality is to never put yourself in the position to have to in the first place. You do that by continual good faith investment in your given role, be it husband or wife.
Do you want to do marriage the easy way or the hard way? -R
🚨 ⚖️ 🗳️ #ScottColom #MSSen WATCH: Marc Elias' "Something Historic is Happening in Mississippi". 💙 Marc: "I am as sure as anything that in the coming days, Scott Colom will be declared the winner and his election will be certified. And I fully expect that when he takes office in January, he will become one of the most critical voices in the fight for voting rights, not just for black Americans, not just in the deep south, but for everyone from coast to coast."
Democracy Docket founder Marc Elias's law firm @EliasLawGroup has signed on to protect his lead in the race. After a gutting of the Voting Rights Act, Marc and his team fought the Republican National Committee to ensure that mail ballots postmarked by Election Day are counted. If you've not already a @DemocracyDocket member, please join now at newsletters.democracydocket.….
In this episode:
00:00 Why Mississippi Is So Personal for Me
04:56 Reagan’s States’ Rights Speech
08:38 Scott Colom’s Historic Senate Race
13:04 Why Democracy Docket Is on the Ground
16:56 Winning Watson v. RNC at the Supreme Court
#MSSen after Democratic stronghold counts affidavit ballots" -- @DemocracyDocket. "Scott Colom (D) now leads Cindy Hyde-Smith (R) by 4,404 votes." -- @marceelias. I find it moving that this happened on #VeteransDay2026. #VeteransDay. God bless our Veterans, freedom, and the ultimate franchise, voting.
#ScottColom’s lead significantly widened after Hinds County, a Democratic stronghold, accepted and counted hundreds of affidavit ballots. Hinds County election commissioners determined Wednesday morning Colom received 703 votes out of 817 accepted affidavit votes cast in the county. His opponent, incumbent Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R), received 96.
Rough Transcript:
Something Historic is Happening in Mississippi - YouTube - Marc Elias
(00:00) I want to say a word about the extraordinary situation going on as Democrats are on the precipice of, as I said earlier, 260 votes in the House and 56 US Senate seats. And I want to focus specifically on one of them, the one in Mississippi. Now, just to be clear, every Senate seat is important. Sherrod Brown, just elected in Ohio, was my first ever client.
(00:36) All the way back in the early 1990s, Sherrod Brown hired me when he was in the House. I've got a lot of affection towards a lot of these candidates, a lot of these members of the House and Senate. It's what I've done my entire career. I know a lot of them personally, and they're good people. But I want to talk specifically about Mississippi and why it is in some ways different for me.
(01:02) So I hope you I hope you'll bear with me here because this is this is uh you know usually in these uh episodes I try to keep it uh light and I try to keep it uh you know I try to keep it uh you know talking about the law but this one's a little more personal for me. As a child, I grew up in New York. And frankly, I knew very little about Mississippi.
(01:25) Most of what I knew was that it was a state in the deep south that had a lot of history involving the civil rights era, and it was not pretty. Candidly, other than visiting my grandparents in southern Florida and a visit across the bridge from Washington DC on a trip my family took there to Arlington National Cemetery, I don't think I'd ever been in any southern state.
(01:52) I lived a pretty cloistered life in my neighborhood in New York. If you had asked me as a kid, you know, to distinguish between one state and another, not just in the south, but in the country, I was shockingly ignorant. We didn't have the internet. You could look up states by opening a paper atlas and you could learn about history either from school or checking a book out of the library or having access to a physical encyclopedia.
(02:29) There was however one place in Mississippi that I knew and it was associated with three names that I will never forget. The place was Philadelphia, Mississippi. And that is the place where three civil rights workers were murdered in 1964 by the Ku Klux Klan and aided by local law enforcement. Their names were James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner.
(03:01) For people of a certain age, of a certain generation, with a certain background, these are names that you not only heard, but that you revered. Their story was not just the story of people willing to do the right thing against all odds, but people who were willing to give the ultimate sacrifice for the rights of others. Like me, Goodman and Schwerner were white and Jewish and from New York.
(03:29) I'll be honest with you, that is no doubt part of the reason why they played so prominently in my early education and upbringing. Chaney was a 21-year-old black Mississippian and he had suffered under the very system that the three of them were there to dismantle because you see they were there as part of Freedom Summer which took place in 1964 and it was an effort to register black voters across Mississippi and I cannot tell you how important their story was, their example was to a young child named Marc Elias because they didn't just stand up for
(04:18) what is right, but they stood up for other people's rights and they they did it knowing the danger and the likely violence that they would face. Their story didn't just inspire me at a level of morality. It didn't just give me pride that there were these that among these three heroes were two Jewish New Yorkers.
(04:49) Frankly, they they sparked my interest in voting rights and shaped my view of politics, which is still that view today. You see, in 1980, when I was 11, Ronald Reagan campaigned in Neshoba at the Neshoba County Fair, which is just a few miles from where the three men were killed. It was effectively his kickoff event for the general election.
(05:21) Of all of the places in America that Ronald Reagan could choose to go, that is where he chose. And of all the messages he could deliver in Philadelphia or near Philadelphia, Mississippi at that county fair, he said, quote, "I believe in states' rights", nearly the exact message, the exact phrase that George Wallace and the segregationists were using over and over again.
(05:51) Ronald Reagan used it as the kickoff to his to his general election presidential campaign. He did not mention Chaney, Goodman, or Schwerner. He did not mention their murders or the complicity of local law enforcement. Eight years later, I was in college and there was a movie that came out called Mississippi Burning. It was at the time a pretty big budget affair.
(06:36) You know, back then we more or less had movies to keep us entertained. There was no social media. There was no internet. And so I went to see this movie. It is a loose, you know, it it it had a lot of critics and rightfully so, but it was loosely based on the events surrounding the murders of these three men.
(07:03) When I went into law practice and I had to choose what I wanted to do, what was the work I wanted to do, I knew that continuing the legacy of what these three men had done was going to be important to me. But there'd be plenty of lawyers who could draft contracts. There'd be plenty of lawyers who could help company A buy company B.
(07:26) There'd be plenty of lawyers who could help make sure the regulatory system was more favorable to this company or that company. but that I wanted to use my talents, my abilities, as best I could, in whatever limited way I could to continue the fight that they were involved in and and frankly to stand up against what Ronald Reagan had done in 1980.
(07:55) And yes, I am aware of all of the Reagan apologists who will say it wasn't really the kickoff event. The kickoff event was in New Jersey. I understand all the apologists who say that, you know, this was I'm reading too much into this, that others are reading too much into this. I'll let you be the judge of that. I might add, by the way, at that New Jersey event that Republicans look to exculpate the former president, he promised to make America great again.
(08:27) Yeah, that's what Ronald Reagan said. I'll leave it to you to decide whether or not to connect the dots that seem very obvious to me. Ahead of the 2020 election, I had an opportunity that I that is among the most cherished that I have. I was able to represent and work with the Andrew Goodman Foundation, named for Andrew Goodman, one of the three men who were killed.
(08:59) I was able to represent them in a handful of voting and election cases that involved young voters. Now, I'm going to be honest with you. I did not expect that I would see the day that a Democrat would be elected to the United States Senate from Mississippi. I certainly did not expect that I would see the day when a black man would be elected from the state where Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner were murdered.
(09:33) Mississippi had not sent a Democrat to the United States Senate since 1982. Two years after Ronald Reagan gave that speech, I was 13 and it had not had a black senator since reconstruction. Perhaps I just doubted too much. Perhaps I didn't understand the dynamics of a changing Mississippi. Perhaps I just had never met anyone or seen anyone like Scott Colom.
(10:08) Scott is a truly extraordinary figure. I I've met and represented the most extraordinary figures in American politics. I worked for Barack Obama when he came to the US Senate as his outside lawyer. I represented him in some cases where Donald Trump was and his ilk, people associated with him, were trying to claim that he was not born in the United States and was not eligible to run or be or hold the office of president.
(10:39) I I've had the privilege of working for Hillary Clinton and getting to know Bill Clinton. I worked for John Kerry. I worked for Kamala Harris and Scott is as dynamic. Scott is as capable and extraordinary as any of them. He is a former prosecutor, I guess currently a prosecutor with compassion and an activist who knows how to achieve results. He is the man of this moment.
(11:08) And so last week when he and his campaign approached my law firm saying they needed lawyers with expertise in post-election in making sure that ballots count and making sure that Republicans can't cheat. I jumped at the idea. Now I want to give credit where credit is due. There is a team of Elias Law Group lawyers right now in the state of Mississippi.
(11:36) They're led by Jackie Lopez and a team of other great lawyers, David Fox, Ezra Ree, Ellie Poston. I could go on and on. And they they deserve all of the credit along with the voters and the election officials in Mississippi and of course Scott who won the election. But I wanted my law firm to do this work.
(11:56) I wanted to be involved in this work because, well, not just because of Mississippi's past. Not just because of the three slain civil rights activists and workers, but because what Scott's victory will mean for the future. Look, I'm 57 and the stories of the civil rights struggle of the 60s, they happened before I was born.
(12:28) I was born in 1969, but they were fresh in my childhood. They were told to me by people not who had heard them or had been young and heard their parents talked about them. They were told to me by the people who experienced them. And they are still burnished in my mind as if I was told them yesterday. And so as a lawyer, this has been instrumental to who I am and the work I do.
(13:00) Whether you agree with it or disagree with it, whether you think I get it right or I get it wrong, it's always there with me. But also, I now have this additional role and that is as the creator and the founder of Democracy Docket, the very outlet, the very entity that is bringing you this episode right now. And so when the vote counting began in Mississippi, it was clear to me that Democracy Docket needed to be there and that I needed to find a way to use my voice to help keep you informed about what's going on.
(13:37) I mean, after all, this is why I started Democracy Docket to begin with. I didn't start Democracy Docket because I was a journalist. I didn't start Democracy Docket because I needed a job. I didn't start Democracy Docket because I wanted to compete with some other news outlet. I started Democracy Docket because there needed to be a pro-democracy voice in what is otherwise a both sides ecosystem.
(14:05) There needed to be an outlet that would call out right from wrong, that would stand up against the people like Donald Trump and the vote suppressors, that if it were happening today, would call out what happened to James Chaney and Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner in unequivocal terms, and call them out for the heroes that they were then and are today.
(14:39) So, for the first time, Democracy Docket has sent journalists to cover a post-election case. Like, even in 2020, it didn't do that. Democracy Docket journalists are on the ground right now in the state of Mississippi, bringing this information to you directly. I am doing these live streams to bring you this information as well as what's going on in the rest of the country directly.
(15:05) While much of the legacy media continues to treat the race in Mississippi as a horse race between a Democrat and a Republican. I am proud that the coverage that Democracy Docket has offered is about what this fundamentally is, a story about democracy and freedom, about free and fair elections and voter suppression, about election workers doing the best they can when you have a state that has election rules written by people who didn't want to make it easy for you to vote or for those election officials to do their jobs.
(15:33) Democracy has no reason to sugarcoat that. No reason to dress it up. No reason to make it seem pretty. No reason to curry favor with and tell a both sides story where there isn't one. I am as sure as anything that in the coming days, Scott Colom will be declared the winner and his election will be certified. And I fully expect that when he takes office in January, he will become one of the most critical voices in the fight for voting rights, not just for black Americans, not just in the deep south, but for everyone from coast to coast,
(16:06) from north to south. Look, Donald Trump and his cronies, they're going to keep fighting. They're going to keep attacking our democracy. They're going to keep attacking our elections. That is unavoidable. And every time the legacy media tries to sell you a counternarrative that somehow Donald Trump has changed his stripes, that somehow Donald Trump will accept the elections, I call it out that it's not true. It's not going to be. It is a lie.
(16:33) The legacy media is like Charlie Brown with a football over and over again. I'll go back after this election to doing what I do. I'll be back in court. I'll be litigating voting in election cases in states and in counties on laws that you've never heard of that are not capturing the nation's attention and don't seem all that important.
(17:00) One of those cases a few years ago involved the Republican National Committee trying to make it impossible for the state of Mississippi to count mail-in ballots if they're postmarked by election day but received afterwards. I saw this lawsuit and said we have to be involved. Our clients want us to be involved. Our clients hired us and retained us to fight for this fight.
(17:28) So, we took on the Republican National Committee. People said we weren't going to win. This is in the Fifth Circuit. You have to go through the trial courts, the federal courts in Mississippi. And Marc, even if you win, you'll wind up in the US Supreme Court and you'll never win there.
(17:53) Last spring, the United States Supreme Court held down handed down the decision in Watson versus Republican National Committee, and we won. It was 5-4, but the five votes were on our side, not the other side. The result is that in this election, approximately 3,000 Mississippian are going to have their ballots counted. Their mail-in ballots will count because the Republican party failed and justice and law prevailed.
(18:30) James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner are heroes of unimaginable proportion. As we say in Judaism, may their memories be a blessing. Fighting to help Scott Colom hold this Senate seat, fighting the Republican National Committee in the US Supreme Court is a small thing that I can do to pay tribute to a much larger generational struggle in which these three men played a part, not even the whole part or even the largest part.
(19:10) That is the spirit that I have tried to instill in this YouTube channel. It's the spirit I've tried to instill in all of Democracy Docket. It is the spirit that I try to bring to all of my work as a lawyer, all my work as an advocate, all my work as an analyst and as someone who speaks out. When Donald Trump targets me, I say I am facing nothing compared to the challenges that the people of Freedom Summer faced.
(19:34) When Republicans call me names, it is not a fraction of the names that they called these three men and many hundreds and thousands of like them in the summer of 1964. I hope you share this same commitment. I hope you appreciate the work that Democracy Docket does. I hope you appreciate the work that that the Andrew Goodman Foundation does.
(19:56) I hope you appreciate the work that countless other civil rights and voting rights organizations, the NAACP, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and many others are doing every day to help make sure that not only are their voting rights today, but that candidates who run on a platform of voting rights, that voters who want to vote for those candidates that they're able to even in a state like Mississippi, especially in a state like Mississippi.
(20:34) Thank you for your time and listening to this. Thank you for all of your attention and your kind words. Please leave a comment if you've appreciated this. Like this channel. Hit the subscribe button. Leave uh uh also um uh forward this uh share this video with a friend if you appreciate it.
(20:53) I appreciate you for being here. If you've not already become a Democracy Docket member, please join now by clicking on the link in the description of this episode or going to democracy.com/join. I'm Mark Elias, voting rights lawyer and founder of Democracy Docket, and I'll see you next time.
#MississippiMatters #MississippiSenate #MSSen #MSPol #ElectionCommission #Experian @scott_colom @andrewcolom @alldspeed @lukechessie @Marina_Liz @Gerard_Hen @patrickgaspard #PickAnotherProtein #PickAnotherSenator #PickAnotherGovernor #PickAnotherAG #VoterSupression @LukeAnalysis
youtube.com/watch?v=m0JCH8An…
I think what he did was clearly wrong because I have a Christian, broadly traditionalist, view of sexual morality. But what grounds do the liberals whom have been mocking any idea of chastity or the sanctity of marriage for decades have to complain?
What's the morality of me bookmarking AI art so I can steal the poses for future art commission ideas?
Two characters who look suspiciously like Walter White and Hank Schrader are sitting in a backyard, casually smoking Cuban cigars. What starts as a chill moment quickly turns into a surprisingly intense conversation about the thin line between what’s legal and what’s illegal.
They dig into the morality of it all, questioning why one thing is accepted while something else is completely outlawed, even when the differences feel arbitrary. The discussion expands as they start drawing parallels between Cuban cigars and other substances, getting more philosophical (and more tense) with every point.
Just when it feels like it’s going full Breaking Bad drama, the whole thing takes a hard left turn into pure absurdity, landing on some modern internet slang that makes the whole exchange completely unhinged.
It’s part parody, part social commentary, and part pure meme energy. The kind of video that starts thoughtful and ends with you laughing at how ridiculous it got.
Naomi Campbell almost face-planted in those ridiculous heels on The Jonathan Ross Show and still looked better than everyone else.
Jonathan Ross made the whole panel do model walks. Gary Barlow, Nicole Scherzinger, Stephen Merchant, Louis Walsh… all of them trying their best. Then Naomi steps out in those platform heels and the whole room tenses up.
She wobbles. She almost goes down. Then she recovers and still owns the runway like only she can. Ross is dying laughing. Everyone else is clapping. She just smiles through it like it’s nothing.
This is the kind of chaotic late-night moment that sticks with you. Watch the full walk especially the almost-fall. You’ll see exactly why people still talk about it.
You are not a bad person for voting for your fav in a silly little online poll. your choices are not a reflection on your morality. vote queen or pluey but just have fun with it and be kind to others abt their choices ok
Yes, all very satirical and funny. Must have taken you ages. But, to be serious for a moment, law is often derived from morality. And that isn't a bad thing. You obviously have no issue with 70-year-old men sleeping with 16-year-old girls. I do. Get over it.
