Follow Yoda for Tesla, SpaceX and TSMC updates. Not financial advice. FREE preview of Brick by Brick and Chip by Chip books here: https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/lgFg0Lbmsf
Joined August 2021
- Tweets37K
- Following532
- Followers19K
- Likes9.7K
Jensen: "And just as I can be fired, the next CEO has to be hired. And I like it that way."
- From @emilychangtv's interview with Jensen.
1
2
479
Nvidia is an issue of AI leadership and therefore national interest.
I believe Jensen Huang is invaluable to the advancement of AI. His contributions to the industry are indisputable.
Recent allegations concerning Jensen’s personal relationships with individuals connected to Nvidia, along with questions surrounding potential conflicts of interest and national security, raise serious concerns. These matters deserve thorough and independent investigation, with accountability based on established facts.
But there is a larger question.
Removing Jensen from Nvidia could significantly slow America’s progress in AI. His vision, leadership, and relationships across the semiconductor supply chain have helped align technology roadmaps, capital investment, and infrastructure development at an unprecedented scale.
Without that leadership, the risk is fragmentation—of strategy, supply chains, partnerships, and investment.
At this scale, Nvidia’s leadership is no longer just a corporate governance matter. It is arguably a matter of national interest.
When the stakes are this high, should the decision to remove Jensen rest solely with Nvidia’s board, or should shareholders have a direct vote on the company’s future leadership?
8
957
I believe Jensen Huang is invaluable to the advancement of AI. His contributions to the industry are indisputable.
Recent allegations concerning Jensen’s personal relationships with individuals connected to Nvidia, along with questions surrounding potential conflicts of interest and national security, raise serious concerns. These matters deserve thorough and independent investigation, with accountability based on established facts.
But there is a larger question.
Removing Jensen from Nvidia could significantly slow America’s progress in AI. His vision, leadership, and relationships across the semiconductor supply chain have helped align technology roadmaps, capital investment, and infrastructure development at an unprecedented scale.
Without that leadership, the risk is fragmentation—of strategy, supply chains, partnerships, and investment.
At this scale, Nvidia’s leadership is no longer just a corporate governance matter. It is arguably a matter of national interest.
When the stakes are this high, should the decision to remove Jensen rest solely with Nvidia’s board, or should shareholders have a direct vote on the company’s future leadership?
Yoda retweeted
And/or have a shareholder vote after the investigation is complete.
Difficult to argue this is in the best interest of shareholders with the stock down 8% after hours on the WSJ report about the board preparing to oust him.
A much better solution for NVIDIA’s board, shareholders, customers and employees (and America) would to (a) finish their investigation and (b) make @JensenHuang the chairman if it comes to that.
Tesla added one more Model Y to its Texas DMV automated-vehicle fleet today.
Registered fleet: 1,303, with 573 Cybercabs and 730 Model Ys.
6
980
The proof is in the memes.