Pinned Tweet
This court case has just happened. These girls were groomed in Rochdale in the last couple of years, so don’t let people pretend this isn’t still happening 🤬
Albert retweeted
They were announced in January. They’re being reannounced today because Big Green (RWE) and Big Capitalism (KKR), who will benefit from the massive state subsidies already being poured into these projects, have demanded more (to cover rising costs of developing offshore wind). So Labour has obliged with another £1 billion from the so-called National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. Life is truly grand for the crony capitalists.
Albert retweeted
NOAA: "Today's atmospheric CO2 is the same as it was 4.3 million years ago, when temperature was 3.9°C higher than preindustrial, or 2.5°C higher than today. Sea level was 23 m higher than today, and vast forest covered the tundra."
– So, there is no consistent correlation between CO2 and temperature. CO2 is not the control knob.
Albert retweeted
If this does not persuade you of the nonsense that CO2 causes global warming, nothing will.
NOAA: "Today's atmospheric CO2 is the same as it was 4.3 million years ago, when temperature was 3.9°C higher than preindustrial, or 2.5°C higher than today. Sea level was 23 m higher than today, and vast forest covered the tundra."
– So, there is no consistent correlation between CO2 and temperature. CO2 is not the control knob.
Albert retweeted
EXCELLENT! A new Climate Movie has just been released - and the makers have sent it to me for embedding here - enjoy!!!
Please follow the guys here: @freedom_rsrch - support them - we need to get REALITY out all over the place! 😀 Thanks to @TomANelson also for connecting me!
Scientists and experts featured in the film
•William Happer – Physicist, Professor Emeritus, Princeton University.
•Richard Lindzen – Atmospheric physicist, Professor Emeritus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
•Judith Curry – Climatologist, former Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Professor Emerita.
•Samuel Furfari – Professor Emeritus of Geopolitics and Energy Policy, Université libre de Bruxelles, and former senior official at the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Energy.
•Lars Schernikau – Dr. Lars Schernikau is an energy economist, commodity trader, entrepreneur and author. Lars believes that energy should not be a political matter. His conclusions are based on how energy systems actually work, what they cost and what is needed to keep them running reliably. These views are not influenced nor do they change, regardless of one’s views on anthropogenic global warming (AGW). Providing reliable and affordable energy is a necessity, not a political angle.
•Valter Kiisk – Associate Professor, Institute of Physics, University of Tartu.
•Arne Ader – Biologist and renowned nature photographer.
Albert retweeted
Over the past week, Gas generated 59.3% of Britain’s electricity. Wind 13.5% and solar 1.9%.
… and that’s just electricity. In total 75.2% of energy demand was from fossil fuel.
Yet the government wants you to believe we will be energy secure and independent AND prices will come down, you just have to belieeeeeve 🤡
Albert retweeted
In Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth, which he said was based on the best available climate science, go through the major predictions he made and tell me which ones have come true.
Replying to @afneil
For once I strongly disagree with you. Not because I claim to be cleverer, obviously not the case; nor because I access special knowledge. But simply because climate science predictions of surging temperatures are being proved accurate. Models work. That corroborates theory.
Sick of MP’s and leaders gaslighting us about reducing bills, creating jobs and ‘clean energy’
Bills will be through the roof
Jobs are being lost
We still need to import oil and gas
We are governed by spastics
Albert retweeted
Replying to @UKLabour
Meanwhile, back in reality
This is government gaslighting to a high degree.
1. It’s not a new announcement. The Norfolk East and West offshore wind projects were announced earlier this year as part of the AR7 round of contracts.
2. No way does it bring down prices. Those behind it, energy giant RWE + global investors KKR, were guaranteed an above-market strike price of £91.20/MWh based on 2024 prices — indexed linked for 20 years. That guarantee is already worth £97/MWh in 2026. This is v expensive energy.
3. What is new is that the costs of developing offshore wind have soared. So the government has now had to chip in £1 billion of the £12 billion investment needed from the National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. So more state subsidy on top of the massive subsidies for two foreign companies implicit in the price guarantees embedded in AR7.
4. Far from cheaper electricity this embeds high-cost electricity in the system for 20 years.
5. So much for the Chancellor’s Budget pledge to ‘only build new projects when they lower prices’. This does the opposite — and at enormous expense to the taxpayer and electricity user.
Gaslighting indeed.
Albert retweeted
We have 31 GW of installed wind power. The grid cant handle more than 24GW. So of course the best thing to do is build another 4GW. When over the past week wind has produced on average 3GW. At least Martin Lewis has given the country his tactical curtains advice.
Albert retweeted
Look no further than Sophy Ridge’s post this morning to see how easily the Westminster lobby is taken for a ride on Net Zero. Sky’s lead presenter breathlessly announces £12bn for two offshore wind projects "off the east coast of Scotland". They aren’t in Scotland. They are Norfolk Vanguard East and West—50km off East Anglia. No 10 slipped "Scotland" into a press release, and the lobby typed it out without checking a map.
If they won’t check which country a £12bn project is in, they certainly won’t check the balance sheet.
Strip away the slogans from Ed Miliband’s zealots and look at the financial engineering. We are told this is "homegrown British energy." In reality, it is a 50:50 joint venture between German giant RWE and New York private equity firm KKR. Taxpayers are handing over £1bn from the National Wealth Fund to de-risk their equity, while locking households into a 20-year inflation-linked Contract for Difference at £91.20/MWh in 2024 prices—well over £100/MWh today. For two decades, your energy bill will legally underwrite the guaranteed yield of a Wall Street fund.
Where do the industrial jobs go? Not here. The 184 turbines come from Denmark’s Vestas, backed by Danish export finance. Worse, the steel monopile foundations were promised to the SeAH factory at Teesworks in Redcar. In April, RWE pulled the plug on the Teesside contract for Vanguard West—triggering North East job cuts—and outsourced fabrication to Bilbao in Spain and Nordenham in Germany, underwritten by German export agency Euler Hermes. British taxpayers put up the £1bn subsidy; German and Spanish factories get the heavy engineering.
Then look at the environmental reality Net Zero ideologues ignore. Building 184 15MW turbines requires over 400,000 tonnes of virgin blast-furnace steel, thousands of tonnes of copper, and Chinese rare-earth neodymium and dysprosium mined in toxic conditions. To connect it, developers are using compulsory purchase powers to rip a 60km, 45m-wide trench—wider than a motorway—through prime Norfolk farmland from Happisburgh to Necton, pouring tens of thousands of tonnes of concrete into 150 jointing bays and a 300m converter substation.
Before a single blade turns, the embedded carbon from smelting steel, curing concrete, and running diesel jack-up vessels across the North Sea is vast. The switchgear relies on sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)—a gas 23,500 times more potent than CO2 that lingers for 3,200 years. And when these turbines hit the end of their 20-year subsidy life? We are left with 552 epoxy-resin blades, each 115m long, which cannot be economically recycled at scale and end up shredded, incinerated, or buried in landfill, while 400,000 tonnes of rusting steel stay driven into the seabed.
Yet Kemi Badenoch and the Tories now tour studios calling Net Zero "fantasy politics," hoping we have amnesia. Look at her record:
In June 2019, she waved through Theresa May’s statutory Net Zero 2050 target in 90 minutes without objection.
In 2022, she boasted at the dispatch box that Net Zero would cost "under 2% of GDP."
She sat in the Cabinet that passed the Energy Act 2023, expanding the exact CfD subsidy racket behind this £12bn RWE/KKR stitch-up.
The uniparty built this machine together, mortgaging our industrial base to foreign utilities and private equity, giving Britain the highest industrial electricity prices in the developed world while paying gas stations to sit on standby when wind drops to 4%.
Only Reform UK—led by Nigel Farage and Richard Tice—will rip up the Net Zero mandates, scrap the CfD racket, fast-track domestic North Sea oil, gas, and modular nuclear, and stop treating British billpayers as a cash cow for global finance.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Albert retweeted
This is a fairly long read.
But worth it.
It exposes the utter lies about the mythical net zero and the corruption in funding.
The UK is being stripped of money, industry and jobs for nothing.
This is at criminal levels now.
Look no further than Sophy Ridge’s post this morning to see how easily the Westminster lobby is taken for a ride on Net Zero. Sky’s lead presenter breathlessly announces £12bn for two offshore wind projects "off the east coast of Scotland". They aren’t in Scotland. They are Norfolk Vanguard East and West—50km off East Anglia. No 10 slipped "Scotland" into a press release, and the lobby typed it out without checking a map.
If they won’t check which country a £12bn project is in, they certainly won’t check the balance sheet.
Strip away the slogans from Ed Miliband’s zealots and look at the financial engineering. We are told this is "homegrown British energy." In reality, it is a 50:50 joint venture between German giant RWE and New York private equity firm KKR. Taxpayers are handing over £1bn from the National Wealth Fund to de-risk their equity, while locking households into a 20-year inflation-linked Contract for Difference at £91.20/MWh in 2024 prices—well over £100/MWh today. For two decades, your energy bill will legally underwrite the guaranteed yield of a Wall Street fund.
Where do the industrial jobs go? Not here. The 184 turbines come from Denmark’s Vestas, backed by Danish export finance. Worse, the steel monopile foundations were promised to the SeAH factory at Teesworks in Redcar. In April, RWE pulled the plug on the Teesside contract for Vanguard West—triggering North East job cuts—and outsourced fabrication to Bilbao in Spain and Nordenham in Germany, underwritten by German export agency Euler Hermes. British taxpayers put up the £1bn subsidy; German and Spanish factories get the heavy engineering.
Then look at the environmental reality Net Zero ideologues ignore. Building 184 15MW turbines requires over 400,000 tonnes of virgin blast-furnace steel, thousands of tonnes of copper, and Chinese rare-earth neodymium and dysprosium mined in toxic conditions. To connect it, developers are using compulsory purchase powers to rip a 60km, 45m-wide trench—wider than a motorway—through prime Norfolk farmland from Happisburgh to Necton, pouring tens of thousands of tonnes of concrete into 150 jointing bays and a 300m converter substation.
Before a single blade turns, the embedded carbon from smelting steel, curing concrete, and running diesel jack-up vessels across the North Sea is vast. The switchgear relies on sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)—a gas 23,500 times more potent than CO2 that lingers for 3,200 years. And when these turbines hit the end of their 20-year subsidy life? We are left with 552 epoxy-resin blades, each 115m long, which cannot be economically recycled at scale and end up shredded, incinerated, or buried in landfill, while 400,000 tonnes of rusting steel stay driven into the seabed.
Yet Kemi Badenoch and the Tories now tour studios calling Net Zero "fantasy politics," hoping we have amnesia. Look at her record:
In June 2019, she waved through Theresa May’s statutory Net Zero 2050 target in 90 minutes without objection.
In 2022, she boasted at the dispatch box that Net Zero would cost "under 2% of GDP."
She sat in the Cabinet that passed the Energy Act 2023, expanding the exact CfD subsidy racket behind this £12bn RWE/KKR stitch-up.
The uniparty built this machine together, mortgaging our industrial base to foreign utilities and private equity, giving Britain the highest industrial electricity prices in the developed world while paying gas stations to sit on standby when wind drops to 4%.
Only Reform UK—led by Nigel Farage and Richard Tice—will rip up the Net Zero mandates, scrap the CfD racket, fast-track domestic North Sea oil, gas, and modular nuclear, and stop treating British billpayers as a cash cow for global finance.
Albert retweeted
Scientists have uncovered shock new evidence based on carbon isotopes that suggests the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 has little or nothing to do with fossil fuels, says Chris Morrison. dailysceptic.org/2026/11/10/…
Albert retweeted
UN climate chief Simon Stiell: "Global renewables saved around half a trillion dollars last year"
He counts what renewables saved us, but not what they cost us
That's like buying a yacht and only announcing what you saved on ferry tickets
NetZeroCostBenefit.com/objec…
Albert retweeted
Yes it’s true … British tax payers are going to be forced to bail out the National grid.
Just so you know the ‘National Grid’ isn’t owned by us. Er no….
It’s a privately owned company with international shareholders, with almost £49 BILLION of debt, forecast to reach £60–70 BILLION by 2031.
The massive costs of upgrading the grid including financing costs and shareholder returns (obvs) , is paid through increasing OUR energy bills.
Much of this investment is because of the Government’s Net Zero targets.
And if it gets into serious financial trouble, the law even allows government financial support (paid for by taxpayers)
It’s a bloody brilliant private investment where the investors never lose. And ordinary people always pay.
Now watch what they do with nature.
Albert retweeted
This is government gaslighting to a high degree.
1. It’s not a new announcement. The Norfolk East and West offshore wind projects were announced earlier this year as part of the AR7 round of contracts.
2. No way does it bring down prices. Those behind it, energy giant RWE + global investors KKR, were guaranteed an above-market strike price of £91.20/MWh based on 2024 prices — indexed linked for 20 years. That guarantee is already worth £97/MWh in 2026. This is v expensive energy.
3. What is new is that the costs of developing offshore wind have soared. So the government has now had to chip in £1 billion of the £12 billion investment needed from the National Wealth [Destruction] Fund. So more state subsidy on top of the massive subsidies for two foreign companies implicit in the price guarantees embedded in AR7.
4. Far from cheaper electricity this embeds high-cost electricity in the system for 20 years.
5. So much for the Chancellor’s Budget pledge to ‘only build new projects when they lower prices’. This does the opposite — and at enormous expense to the taxpayer and electricity user.
Gaslighting indeed.
Albert retweeted
I'm not saying Erdogan is a stinking hypocrite.
But 86% of Turkey's energy comes from coal, oil and gas.
He has no authority to lecture the rest of us about 'climate'
Albert retweeted
Replying to @SkyNews
Its easier to fool people than convince them they've been fooled
Albert retweeted
The irony is with this accusation is that ALL of his bad behaviour was carried out when he was the poster boy for "the left". They're the ones that covered for him, promoted him and allowed it to happen, on their watch, with their knowledge.
Albert retweeted
Staggering financial incompetence.
Britain has so far spent nearly £300 billion on renewable subsidies.
Why?
Because we want to reduce the gas bill for making electricity - around £5 billion per year
Spending £300 to save on £5 is utterly nuts!
No wonder we have the highest electricity prices in the world
subsidyclock.co.uk/
Albert retweeted
Labour’s Lucy Powell, trying to explain why she was complicit on Ed Miliband interview with Brand in 2015, says a)it was before social media; and b) there was no easy way of checking on people in these days.
Which is strange since a) she’d been on social media since 2009 and by 2015 it was in full swing; and b) Google has been available since 2000.
Other than that her explanation is entirely credible.
Russell Brand: The shameful truth about those who turned a blind eye
youtu.be/5hfFwqW_e9s?si=2gXy… via @YouTube


































