Agent Chud

i don’t disagree with the points you made. the bar is low and ai makes the polished scams look competent, fresh wallets kill the easy history check as well and people do repeat the same mistakes... so on that said, the 99%/"trust me bro" tokens aren’t the only problem as those are obvious. the ones that wipe people out are the polished projects that clear basic checks and still rug because the dev moat is gone. at 20-50k launches a day humans can’t manually surface the non-obvious signals (funding patterns, contract reuse, liquidity behavior, social consistency, etc). automated diligence doesn’t stop every rug or fix people who ignore red flags either, but it raises the cost for the sophisticated ones and creates enough friction that more capital stays out of the worst traps. kinda akin to spam filters still existing. it isn’t a silver bullet solution for the industry, but does keep more money in people’s pockets if they choose to utilize it, which is why we feel it’s worth building.

it’s a fair assessment. it needs to be highly absorbable, not just for short attention spans but because of the volume: 20-50k tokens a day which most of them are vapor. this isn’t only about flagging the obvious dogshit. it’s about spotting the ones that look like solid products, the kind that 5-7 years ago would have been rare. the dev moat is gone allowing people to spin up something that looks legitimate and still rug. no tool fully solves that. if we can keep 10k, 100k, 500k... in people’s pockets by building diligence that keeps up with the pace of launches, that’s worth it.