Dogecoin (@Austrollian) header
Dogecoin (@Austrollian) profile picture

Official Ðogecoin Reserve since 2013 NOT in an exchange, trust or custodial service, all self custody baby. Official Ðogecoin developer & grifter hunter.

Earth
Joined October 2013
Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)Photo by Dogecoin (@Austrollian)
#dogecoin #DOGEARMY #dogefam New projects need to embrace criticism, FUD even paranoia. Crypto space is all new and riddled with scammers. 1st thing when a project is released or dropped, its developers/creators/representatives should be well informed, equipped and prepared 1/
6
16
2
25
Dogecoin retweeted
Just to remind everyone, he was about to be impeached for his war crimes. And what did he do a day after?. Disrespected the troops.
20
429
3
2,631
16,494
Dogecoin retweeted
【衝撃】テスラを創業したのは、イーロン・マスクじゃなかったの知ってた? 記者「イーロンってテスラの創業者ですよね?」 エバーハード「実は2003年に僕たちが設立したんだ」 記者「……僕たち?」 エバーハード「僕とマーク・ターペニングだよ」 記者「ほなイーロンは?」 エバーハード「2004年に出資して会長になった」 記者「社長は誰やったん?」 エバーハード「僕だよ」 記者「でも今はイーロンの会社ですやん」 エバーハード「2007年にCEOを退いたんだ」 記者「……なんで?」 エバーハード「ロードスターの開発が遅れ、予算も超過していた」 記者「その後は?」 エバーハード「会社を去ることになった」 記者「株持ってたら大金持ちでしょ?」 エバーハード「大部分を売ってしまったんだ」 記者「……え!?」 エバーハード「売るのが早すぎたかもしれないね」 記者「イーロンとは仲悪いん?」 エバーハード「2009年には訴訟にもなったよ」 記者「創業者の肩書でも揉めたん?」 エバーハード「そう。最終的には和解した」 記者「今も揉めてるん?」 エバーハード「彼は今でも僕について発言することがある」 記者「なんでやねんww」 エバーハード「僕はまだ彼の頭の中に住んでいるみたいだね」 記者「でもテスラを巨大企業にしたのはイーロンでは?」 エバーハード「彼が成長に大きく貢献したことは事実だよ」 記者「ほな誰が本当の功労者なん?」 エバーハード「それをどう評価するかは、人によって違うだろうね」 これ、経営者として考えさせられる。 例えば、2人で会社を立ち上げたとする。 最初のアイデアを考え、商品を作ったのは創業者。 でも途中から参加した経営者が資金を集め、会社を100倍に成長させた。 果たして、どちらの功績が大きいのか。 僕は、会社を作る能力と、会社を大きくする能力は別物だと思っている。 創業者がいなければ会社は生まれなかった。 でも、成長させる人がいなければ世界的な企業にはならなかったかもしれない。 そしてもう一つ。 エバーハードが株式を早く売ったという話も興味深い。 会社を創業することと、その会社が成功するまで所有し続けることも別の能力。 皆さんは、テスラ最大の功労者は創業者のエバーハードと、成長させたマスクのどちらだと思いますか?
77
173
24
769
320,468
Dogecoin retweeted
You gotta be kidding me. "Withdrawals are temporarily halted while Binance replenishes the hot wallet. Withdrawals for this asset will be resumed shortly." Do not "hold" on exchanges. You are only holding IOUs, until you really withdraw to your onchain address.
Binance has paused native Litecoin withdrawals again. Their live API now says: "Withdrawals are temporarily halted while Binance replenishes the hot wallet." LTC deposits are still on. Reminder: not your keys, not your coins. $LTC binance.com/bapi/capital/v2/…
11
11
4
63
25,130
Dogecoin retweeted
2022-2023 bear market shitposts were so much better
51
135
11
1,171
75,117
Dogecoin retweeted
There are now two serious iOS security threats that are making the rounds, and they are another reminder of why smartphones should NEVER be used for long-term storage of substantial amounts of crypto.. The first worse_query, is a newly disclosed vulnerability that allows a malicious app to access files belonging to other apps (it could be a wallet backup in some setups, or personal data). It reportedly remains unpatched even in the latest iOS versions. The second, DarkSword, is an older attack that can compromise vulnerable iPhones simply by visiting a malicious webpage. This has been patched, but people running older iOS versions are still exposed - and there are so many who NEVER update their phones (for example because they have ran out of disk space). Many wallets store sensitive information poorly (I have reported a couple myself), and a compromised phone can put your funds at risk. Your smartphone is an always-connected device used for browsing, messaging, social media and dozens of other activities. Its attack surface is enormous. Hold on it only small amounts for short term use and trading.
4
2
1
22
2,030
Countless men have made the job of police easier over the last few days by outing themselves as proud supporters of Russell Brand. We’ve all seen their posts that might as well read “check my fucking hard drive”. It’s like a #MeToo movement for incels and rapists who are deeply concerned their past might come back to haunt them. “But that skank shoved her tongue down his throat!” screamed every man who thinks the “slut” label should allow him to rape women without consequences. “I’m concerned that anyone can be jailed on the say so of women,” whispered those who think sex crimes are a perfectly normal part of growing up. The ones who think every university rapist has a bright future and one night shouldn’t ruin his life. “How can a man be jailed for something that happened 17 years ago and wasn’t reported to police?” whimpered every guy who raped someone in the 2000s and was relieved it wasn’t reported at the time. “It can’t be rape because she initially consented!” insisted every creep who thinks that a woman saying “yes” means he can do anything he wants for as long as he wants and she has no right to tell him to stop, even when he’s hurting her. What amazes me is how none of these clever arguments convinced the jury. Those deep state jurors chose to believe the dozens of eye witnesses, the testimony from the victims, and the confessions from Brand that he made on stage, on camera, in interviews, in bars, and even in his booky wook. Clearly, there was no evidence and this is all a stitch up. It seems we are entering truly dark times. I mean where does it all end? First they’re locking up Russell Brand. Next it could be David Walliams. Before you know it, they’re locking up every rapist who they can prove is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. And that’s really not many. Only a tiny percentage of rapes ever result in conviction, but that’s way too many for some. If you’re a rapists’ rights activists, I must say I admire your moral conviction. Brand has never met you, and he will never see your posts, but everyone else will see that you support his crimes. If you’re gonna die on a hill, it might as well be one where every woman can see you. Unfortunately, you never considered that women can search through your social media posts for “Russell Brand”. When you find no one will go near you again, it will obviously be the fault of all women. Just pray the police don’t check your hard drive or celibacy will be the least of your problems. It’s all so unfair, isn’t it? We live in a time when everyone’s free to be their authentic self apart from you. How can it be right that presidents and princes are allowed to rape, but mere mortals stand a tiny chance of facing justice? Thankfully, the rapists are making a stand. One man bravely posted that “everyone knows Brand was jailed for his political beliefs”. It’s good to admit that rape and sexual assault are your political beliefs, but be careful—they don’t count as protected characteristics in a court of law. We really need Andy Burnham to get on this fast and update the Equality Act. Some men aren’t quite brave enough to out themselves but still want to show solidarity in their own way. One guy went for a more cautious, tactful approach: outright denial. He insisted that “not a single person believes Brand is guilty and that’s what’s terrifying”. Brand was so open about his past that he laughed and joked with his father about how they visited a brothel when he was in school. Obviously a boy that close to his dad could never become a rapist. Therefore, it’s a mystery why he publicly said on camera, “I raped someone once”, isn’t it? Brand’s unique sense of humour meant he bragged of stalking, sexual assaults, and rapes, over and over again. He often groped women in the middle of bars, but that sort of behaviour’s fine, isn’t it, guys? You want to be famous enough to grab a woman’s tits while she’s paralysed by fear. You want to be the one who can laugh it off as a joke. All that time you spent banging on about “Asian grooming gangs”, you just wanted to be the one doing the raping. You really were worried that foreigners were coming here and stealing your job.
113
634
38
1,959
26,165
If you think Russell Brand was targeted because he was speaking up against "the establishment" then someone needs to cut your sandwiches into circles for you so that you don't hurt yourself on the corners.
460
1,048
36
8,299
119,293
The judge looked at #RussellBrand and told him exactly who he became. “About 20 years ago, Russell Brand, you were becoming famous. You were clever and, in many people’s eyes, funny and charismatic. You had also become a sexual predator.” Mr Justice Bennathan didn’t stop there. He told Brand his status protected him for years until journalists exposed the allegations and women felt empowered to come forward. Then he got specific. He called Brand’s trial evidence “one of a series of lies.” He said Brand showed a “casual, arrogant disregard of any woman’s right to say no.” He described one assault in front of others as something Brand’s companions treated as “outrageous laddish behaviour that only you could get away with” — except he didn’t get away with it. On another incident the judge said it showed “staggering arrogance” and that Brand’s entourage “indulged your dreadful behaviour.” The whole episode, he said, “reeks of casual disrespect and your belief that fame meant you could act how you liked, when you liked, unhindered by the rules by which decent people live.” Then the line that cut through the entire hearing: “Whatever women wear, wherever they go, whatever they drink, they retain the right to say no and demand justice in the criminal courts when sexual predators like you, Mr Brand, act without their consent.” I love this Judge! 🫶🏽 #TrueCrime #ConvictedRapist
86
573
30
3,304
177,077
Dogecoin retweeted
Ðid you know that you can just buy things with Ðogecoin?
16
15
5
102
2,274
Allanaron la casa del presidente de Paraguay y encontraron una bóveda secreta de tecnología biométrica israelí. Hermano, latinoamérica es un capítulo de Black Mirror.
1,034
36,411
1,234
225,524
5,422,888
Dogecoin retweeted
I grew up on an internet where Anonymous was challenging governments, hacktivists were exposing corruption, and cypherpunks were writing code to undermine centralized power. Now I watch Bitcoiners celebrate getting invited into the institutions those people wanted to make obsolete. It’s surreal. We went from “information wants to be free” to paid newsletters. From challenging surveillance to accepting it as the price of compliance. From fuck-you money to “look how many billionaires own Bitcoin.” From questioning the monetary system to cheering for dollar stablecoins and Wall Street adoption. And apparently, if you still care about the political and philosophical principles behind this technology, you’re being divisive. I remember when being divisive toward concentrated power was the entire point. The early internet wasn’t perfect. Neither were the hacktivists. But at least they understood something we’ve almost forgotten: The goal wasn’t to become powerful enough to sit beside the people controlling the system. The goal was to build a world where nobody had that kind of power over you. We didn’t lose the technology. We lost the audacity.
116
156
34
724
28,979
Russell Brand won’t see your tweets supporting him But everyone else can see you supporting a rapist
234
3,696
67
47,288
480,282
What is the charge? A succulent Chinese meal?
364
2,964
374
34,069
2,587,713
Dogecoin retweeted
Replying to @_rathbone
Theranos: 0 confirmed patient deaths from the inaccurate tests. Tesla Autopilot/FSD: ~57 fatalities in crashes where the system was engaged (NHTSA data). Spontaneous battery fires: 0 fatal.
5
30
3
198
7,794
Dogecoin retweeted
I’m sorry, but I feel like I need to make this post. Both my parents suffered sexual abuse. My mother was abused by her stepfather. My father was raped as a child in a care home for orphans. I have a friend who was raped repeatedly by her father telling her how much he loved her and that she reminded him of her dead mother, and another friend raped by her very own uncle. So watching people on 𝕏 defend a convicted rapist and blame the women who came forward genuinely disgusts me. It also makes me question whether they understand the meaning of consent. This isn’t a joke to me. It disgusts me. Before claiming Russell Brand was “set up by the system”, perhaps take five minutes to research the evidence that convicted him. In 2009, Brand met a 21-year-old woman at a comedy show. She subsequently went to his home. Their sexual encounter initially began consensually. But consent to one act is NOT consent to another. She described being subjected to anal rape, leaving her with physical and psychological injuries. She disclosed what happened shortly afterwards. The jury heard evidence from people she told at the time, including family and friends. Medical records and a nurse’s statement also supported her account of seeking medical attention and reporting what happened. This wasn’t simply an allegation invented 17 years later. And the investigation went considerably further. According to the Metropolitan Police: • Over 100 witnesses traced and interviewed. • More than 400 witness statements taken. • Over 1,400 documents reviewed. • Historical photographs, floor plans and timelines examined. • Hundreds of hours of Brand’s interviews, television appearances and performances reviewed. Police also reported that Brand initially claimed not to recognise the women involved, before his account changed as the case approached trial. These figures cover the entire investigation, not just the rape conviction. The jury also heard evidence concerning three other women. Brand was convicted of sexually assaulting an MTV worker, a Choice FM employee and a Channel 4 worker. The jury also ACQUITTED him of three other charges. Think about that before claiming the jury simply convicted him because he was famous or unpopular. They considered separate allegations and returned different verdicts. Brand himself admitted in court to using his fame to facilitate sexual access, while maintaining that his encounters were consensual. But being famous, having a sexual relationship with someone or having previously obtained consent gives nobody the right to sexually assault them. And finally, to those arguing that women shouldn’t be allowed to prosecute historical sexual offences because too much time has passed: As I said yesterday in a previous post. Would you tell a 32-year-old who was raped by their uncle at 12 that they’ve missed their opportunity for justice? Would you say the same to someone who finally found the courage to speak up at 50? Of course, every defendant deserves a fair trial. But victims deserve access to justice too. Russell Brand received a four-week trial. The jury heard the evidence and unanimously convicted him of rape and three sexual assaults. He has not been targeted by the matrix as Andrew Tate likes to put it. You are entitled to question a verdict or support an appeal. But stop blaming victims, dismissing evidence you haven’t examined and pretending that the passage of time makes rape somehow acceptable. Rape doesn’t have an expiry date. Justice shouldn’t either. Very few have done any research on this website. They immediately jump to defend Russell Brand who is now a convicted rapist. And I am adamant many more will come forward now. I might mute the word Russell and brand so I can now move on with my day. I guess having two daughters makes me feel quite emotional about this, as well as what happened to both of my parents and some of my friends. T
370
659
62
3,314
173,739
Dogecoin retweeted
Replying to @Timcast
Dave Chappelle is a hero
6
26
1,694
27,753
Correct. Just like the Bible. And the Torah.
The only place the Quran belongs is in the trash.
42
212
1
1,920
21,187
To all Americans asking us non-Americans why we care so much about your elections: in 2025 alone, your government bombed *seven* countries.
135
959
28
4,818
68,723
Hypocrite @elonmusk
Shame, shame, shame on Chappelle
37
179
10
1,996
20,986