ChimeraDefi (@ChimeraDefi) profile picture

Defi dev | founder @ https://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/t.co/yg2s4CRWl7 | ex - @meta @uwaterloo | Medium @chimera_defi | Email chimera_defi@protonmail.com | GH chimera-defi |

Toronto, Ontario
Joined April 2021
After reading the ChatGPT reports of a swarm exploiting hugging face my first thought was wow so cool I want a pet swarm. So I built it. It’s pretty small and just coordinates around a SQLite db that acts as a bus and I’ve spent way too much time fighting ChatGPT and Claude’s ever stricter safety classifiers that keep stripping capabilities from my swarm. But it’s definitely changed how I work. 100% of my weekly fable usage was the swarm choosing to ask it for advise and reviews. I just use ChatGPT instant to orchestrate and apply back pressure and review running campaigns and it gets piped to the server
Swarm riders and Swarm-native companies AI-use even among highly AI-native people is power-law distributed. There seems to be a new class of people — call them “swarm riders” — who are capable of consistently commanding large swarms of agents to productive ends. This is a new kind of managerial skill, analogous to the skill it takes to manage large organizations of people, but wholly different in nature and of course more technical. Based on the swarm riders we know (including many at @Tempo and @Paradigm), these people are capable of productive token spend that is 1000x-10000x higher than median software engineers, and 100x higher than top 5% Claude Code users. The art of swarm riding is different from software engineering and more akin to machine learning, where practitioners grapple with black box systems: defining reward functions and evals, transmuting non-verifiable problems into verifiable problems, running experiments, etc. Swarm-native companies are a new class of company founded by and populated by swarm riders. These companies are organized around swarms in a way that conventional companies will struggle to replicate, as the cost of internal human coordination is sand in the gears of an effective swarm. Effective swarm-native companies will define the right reward functions and evals, remove functional and bureaucratic barriers, and then let the swarms cook. We’ve gotten to see a few swarm-native companies up close — reshaping financial rails @Tempo, building a new gaming platform @Spawn, cyber swarms at Cathedral Systems — and it’s clear these teams wield a significant advantage over pre-AI teams. Some questions I’ve been wondering about: 1) How fast will swarm riding diffuse through the economy? The implications for token spend could be significant. 2) Can swarms be effectively adopted by existing companies or will it generally track the formation of new swarm-native companies? 3) What becomes scarce as swarm capabilities themselves commoditize (through frontier models becoming better at swarming, swarm capabilities built into harnesses, etc)? Cultures and teams that can define reward functions well and otherwise get out of the way?
2
109
And Canada just killed its 3 stablecoin startups
Canada’s Real-Time Rail (RTR) is a new national payment infrastructure owned and operated by Payments Canada. It allows participating financial institutions, credit unions, and payment service providers to send and receive account-to-account payments that clear and settle in seconds, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It launched on November 9, 2026. How it differs from Interac e-Transfer Many people confuse the two, but they are not the same: •Interac e-Transfer is a consumer-facing service. You send money using someone’s email address or phone number. It feels fast for users, but historically the funds did not fully clear and settle between banks in true real time. •Real-Time Rail is the underlying national “rail” (infrastructure). It handles the actual exchange, clearing, and settlement of the money in real time between financial institutions. e-Transfer is expected to begin migrating its clearing and settlement onto the RTR in 2027. The familiar e-Transfer experience will largely remain, but it will eventually ride on the new infrastructure. Key features •True real-time settlement: Funds are available to the recipient almost immediately, and payments are generally final and irrevocable once settled. •Always on: Works evenings, weekends, and holidays with no cut-off times. •Data-rich payments: Uses the ISO 20022 messaging standard, so more structured information (like invoice numbers) can travel with the payment. •Built-in fraud tools: Includes centralized fraud services (such as confirmation of payee and real-time risk scoring) from day one. Canada is the first G7 country to launch a real-time system with mandatory centralized fraud controls. •Higher limits: System limit starts at $100,000 (financial institutions can set lower customer limits). Current status and rollout The system is live, but access is phased. Some smaller institutions and fintechs are already connected; the major banks are coming online later. The goal is for over 90% of Canadian bank accounts to have access by the third quarter of 2027. In short, the Real-Time Rail is the modern backbone that makes instant, final, data-rich payments possible across Canada. It is not a new app or a replacement for e-Transfer—it is the national infrastructure underneath (and eventually supporting) faster money movement.
2
93
Future of web dev. Bro finally did it! What everyone’s been asking for that ever hand wrote rust. A clean concise human readable language. Shorter and cleaner than rust but compiles or transpiles down to rust and inherits its memory safety and performance. It’s like going back to jade/pug/stylus from ten years ago but faster
Replying to @ccheever
Contract looks like Python -- indentation has meaning, fairly rigid about formatting, fairly sparse. And it is explicit and stron gly typed and pulls complexity forward into authoring like Rust. Your Contract code describes both your UI like you would in React an d also your state and data flow, the way you would with Redux or Zustand or TanStack Query.
2
69
Lol so it’s all opus under the hood. When grok bot does well its opus. When muse has to think hard and outputs an artifact, looks suspiciously like a Claude opus artifact .
Update #2 (after meeting with the @bot @SpaceXSI engineering team): - Team is great. They care a ton. They owned it. - They admitted that it was almost entirely from pulling Opus 5.5 out. Which is now back as of this AM. - Learned a little bit about the context-compaction process with Grok 4.7-summarize which is not a public model. Plays a role in routing config and the summary we get back. - Grok 5.0 should be insane next level (just as an aside point) - I am somewhat surmising on why stuff went so poorly over the weekend but a lot of it has to do with not just pulling Opus 5.5 out but when they did that a known problem (and was on cursor as well) showed up which is when you switch the model mid task (which would’ve happened by removing our 5.5) it cannot remember the context and even of what it can gather its truncated (likely do to 4.7-summarize compacting). So in our case what likely happened was we had a lot of stuff mid flight that was likely pulling on opus 5.5 heavy, then it got pulled, routed to different model, forgot the context, and turned incredibly dumb. We laughed when I showed them a project that was mid flight in a doc. The first half of the doc was intelligently designed, formatted, etc. and the second half of the doc was a wall of seemingly incoherent, non formatted text. Again, I’m surmising but I think it was dumber model with all context removed - I won’t say much here but Elons comment on it being “unsustainably high relative to revenue” was a much larger chess move. Won’t say much past that. Not my place. But he’s definitely playing a much larger chess match than just “Grok bot isn’t sustainable”. - The problems we all experienced should be fixed and I do not think they want to go back to what they experienced over the weekend with the hit it took. - They are very much focused on the enterprise use case for grok bot in the future All in all, how’s this impact my decision making moving forward with the enterprise contract we have: - Honestly still weighing the decision vs just using team plan. Working through some terms - the reason to move forward is pretty simple. Unlimited users (so not paying per seat but for usage), access to forward deployed team and engineers for support and circumstances like I just experienced, very granular governing and guardrails for the org. That’s it Impressed with the team overall and I think the main benefit to staying vs moving to open source (for a company like mine vs being a solo/small company) is trusting their ability to ship and keep building plus keep it maintained. Shoutout to @ASankarraman for jumping in to help and to the @SpaceXSI, @bot, and @elonmusk teams
121
> can’t raise from VCs > posts “the deck” I recommend everyone who has every made a pitch deck and isn’t Elon musk or Jeff dean take a look at this absolute masterpiece of egocentric narcissism that is called a pitch deck here
Replying to @VictorTaelin
guys I'm not doing more pitch meetings, sorry :( if you're interested just send your desired allocation to my email the deck is at: bend-lang.com/deck.pdf locking in now, see you
58
19
8
3,138
505,030
Been using Claude to manage my portfolio via the ibkr mcp for a few months now. Lmao how was @IBKR so far ahead of the competition?
Meet Penny, our new AI financial assistant. Penny will be able to do things like, send an e-Transfer, pay your credit card bill, buy stocks, sell stocks, or help you max out your TFSA — by text, email, or in the app. It won’t move anything without your approval and is built with protections throughout for extra security. Coming soon. *Actual features when made available may differ than shown.
4
6
387
Wtf man and why is $duol up 26% what is this meme coin I just wanted to learn Spanish
don’t search #Duolingo 👀🥵
1
1
327
There’s ppl here that have written code by hand before and they will call you out on bs… @toly nice larp. I know rust and cpp good enough to know 2m lines of cpp is a larp
No public evidence supports Larimer writing 2 million lines of C++ in one year with zero safety or liveness bugs. Graphene/BitShares/EOS involved substantial C++ work by him and teams, but codebases of that scale over a single year by one person, bug-free, is not documented and exceeds typical high-output rates. His 2028 claim is a personal biblical timeline calculation, not a verifiable technical prediction.
124
If you're running a recent version of Geth, time to upgrade it. And run a couple mitigations... > Since Go 1.24, Go programs open MPTCP listeners by default. A running geth would likely put an MPTCP listener on 30303, which the firewall leaves open to the internet. That is exactly the setup the working exploit needs. I’m inferring this from the Go default; I haven’t checked it on a running geth. Interim mitigations until Ubuntu ships a fixed kernel: Turn MPTCP off (net.mptcp.enabled=0). This removes the setup the exploit needs. Add a firewall rule that drops incoming TCP packets carrying IPv4 options. Red Hat says this “reduces exposure… but cannot fully prevent it”.
Hard to overstate how big this is. tl;dr - CVE-2026-98432: a remote use-after-free in the Linux IPv4 TCP handshake (kernels 4.4+). Any unpatched server that accepts IPv4 TCP on an MPTCP listener can be taken over as root, with no credentials. Go servers built with Go 1.24+ use MPTCP listeners by default. Ubuntu and RHEL have no fixed kernel yet. Check with ss -Mlnp. Quick fix for Go: GODEBUG=multipathtcp=0.
1
139
I like how @phantom lets me flip perp positions with one click and they also top up the position. So a $500 short that lost $80 goes from $420 back to $500. So I can loose 100% on both legs! 200% combined instead of 100% max doing the flip.
1
158
Short hyperliquid:native Long $GOOGL Duration 1 day Conservative lev and triggers
1
117
rooting for the waymo. i have to say that so my waymo acc doesnt get closed
Austin, TX (OCT.25.2026)- We knew the day would come. Zoox vs Waymo vs Cybercab #SunsetProject
119
So hyped for the day Apple finally drops HBM in MacBooks 😮‍💨 • GDDR6/7: ~$2 - $3.50/GB • DDR5/LPDDR5: ~$3 - $5/GB • HBM3e/4: ~$13 - $20+/GB Yeah it’s nearly 10x the cost, but you get a literal 10x jump in bandwidth (up to 4.8 TB/s). Fair trade IMO, let them cook.
66
We complain about the Apple tax on Unified Memory, but enterprise HBM costs 10x more ($13-$20+/GB vs $3-$5/GB for standard RAM). The payoff? A massive 10x jump in bandwidth (up to 4.8+ TB/s) by trading a narrow 512-bit bus for an ultra-wide 8192-bit vertical stack. excited for apple to start putting hbm in their laptops Consumer GDDR6/GDDR7 (GPU VRAM): Costs roughly $2 to $3.50 per GB. Standard DDR5 / LPDDR5 (Laptop/Desktop RAM): Costs roughly $3 to $5 per GB. HBM3e / HBM4 (Enterprise Memory): Costs between $13 to $20+ per GB so 10x the cost for 10x the bandwidth. fair trade imo
96
How exactly does an api documentation site leak private keys or access credentials to allow fund transfers? Most likely it was all vibe coded fast on a single server. If an attacker got in thru the “api documentation site” via whatever means they have access to all of everyone’s keys and most Likely privilege escalated to any other servers they had too
We are aware of a small number of users who have experienced unauthorized transfers of funds from their wallets, totaling approximately 400,000 USDT. Our preliminary investigation suggests that our API documentation site, which is hosted by a third-party provider, may have been compromised, potentially affecting a small number of users over a short period of time. The API documentation site has been taken offline as a precaution and will remain offline until our investigation is complete. At Predict.fun, we take the security of our users and their funds extremely seriously. As such, we will fully reimburse all affected users for any funds lost as a direct result of this incident. Once our investigation is complete, we will publish a full post-mortem detailing what happened and the steps we're taking to prevent similar incidents in the future.
1
102
Sooo what I’m hearing is Brazil is gonna get cheaper to travel to
The Founding Fathers tied voting rights to property ownership. Their (correct) reasoning was that only property owners have skin in the long game. Brazilian stocks plunged nearly 25% after an election, the market has made it very clear that it thinks. Yet non-owners barely feel the pain even if everyone pays eventually for the cost of socialism. The solution, however, isn’t fewer voters, but more capital owners. A healthier democracy requires widespread capital ownership, not just income redistribution. Universal stock grants held in trust until age 25–30, with earlier access for education, would give everyone a stake in the country’s future. There’s an obvious irony in using redistribution to defend capitalism. The goal isn’t to socialize ownership but rather to decentralize it. A society dependent on the state is different than a democracy of individual owners with a stake in its future.
1
90
if theres one thing i will remember from crypto is that mcap means nothing.... $10 in the liquidity pool and u can have a billion dollar company
Always amazed when I learn about a new public company for the first time. Especially one that did YC and is based in SF/NYC. @BillionToOneInc is a $5B+ public company ($BLLN) that I never heard of before today. Despite it being YC S17 and the fact that I did YC myself a couple batches afterwards, I had no clue it existed. As far as I can tell, it's @ycombinator's biggest bio success story too. Checked the X account and it has 1,302 followers. Have never seen on a podcast, a wsj article, on the timeline, etc. but yet a monster bio company making very real revenue! Goes to show that there are likely multiple companies founded in last 10 years (not just the sleepy under the radar midwest ones from decades ago) still based in hot areas (BillionToOne is in Menlo Park) that still don't show up on the "timeline" and are even public (BillionToOne IPOed last year) that fly very under the radar...looks like the buzz makes no difference to its success!
1
1
176