Founder @RyuStudioHQ Building the bridge between creators & projects across Web3 × Gaming. Connecting talent. Creating opportunities. All Posts NFA + DYOR
Go ➔
Joined April 2022
- Tweets153K
- Following11.7K
- Followers22.2K
- Likes141K
Pinned Tweet
Hey sit down, Superman.
Vibes are immaculate, motion is unmatched 👇
Jump in: bg.vibevibe.fun
cc: @meta_alchemist @vibevibefun
Most young protocols burn runway while building out their core tools.
Turtle took a different path by delivering services and distribution to fund its own development.
According to their latest update, Turtle generated $1.04M in revenue in Q3 across Turtle and Lunar Strategy, measured on a cash-in basis and net of intercompany transactions.
During this period of revenue generation, Hare launched with GSR committing 100M over several years, Creator Wire shipped, and Streams shifted to self service.
This revenue serves as proof of demand for the infrastructure @turtledotxyz is building to connect capital with onchain assets.
Tokenized assets other than stablecoins reached $46.1B on 4 November, highlighting the growing requirement for reliable liquidity distribution rails.
The $TURTLE token provides coordination access across the network, operating independently from protocol revenue distribution.
Read the full Q3 breakdown here: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/turtledotxyz/status/21…
Winner Winner Chicken Dinner 🤣🤣
This game got me addicted, thanks @meta_alchemist @vibevibefun
Can an infrastructure protocol cover its own expenses while building its tools? The Q3 update from @turtledotxyz gives a concrete answer to this.
→ Figure : $1.04M.
→ Scope: Turtle and Lunar Strategy.
The amount is calculated on a cash inflow basis and after deducting intercompany transactions.
Turtle generated revenue while shipping its products. Normally an infrastructure project finishes the product first, then generates revenue. In Turtle both happen at the same time.
→ Hare started with a 100M commitment spread over several years with GSR.
→ Creator Wire launched at the end of August.
→ Streams became usable by anyone on their own.
The part that caught my attention is this: service revenue provides very fast information about the product. If a team pays for the work it does, it also shows which tool it actually uses and where it gets stuck. When the product is developed alone, you reach this information months later.
According to what is written in the update, Hare and Lunar Strategy are mentioned as the first two external businesses working on Turtle tools.
Non stablecoin tokenized assets were at the $46.1B level on November 4.
There is still a need for the layer that connects these assets to capital, and Turtle is trying to build this layer.
A single quarter does not tell everything, but I continue to follow this side.
Q3 update: 👇
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/turtledotxyz/status/21…
NFA / DYOR
I looked at the comparison @grvt_io shared.
The same 10,000 USDT can produce three different outcomes over one year.
→A traditional savings account at 0.38 percent returns roughly 38 USDT.
→GRVT Earn at 3.5 percent returns roughly 350 USDT.
→GRVT High Yield Earn targeting 11 percent can reach up to 1,100 USDT.
The gap does not come only from the percentage.
High Yield Earn mixes TradFi and crypto strategies together.
When I look at setups like this I pay more attention to where the money actually comes from than the highest number on the page.
Sources that are spread out feel more relevant in this market than yield piled into a single place.
NFA / DYOR 👇
Q3 closed with $1.04M in revenue while the infrastructure was still being built.
The figure published in the @turtledotxyz Q3 update:
→ Revenue: $1.04M
→ Scope: Turtle and Lunar Strategy
→ Basis: cash in, net of intercompany
The revenue came from services and distribution while the tools were still being built out. In the same period:
→ Hare launched with GSR, with 100M committed over several years
→ Creator Wire shipped in late August
The update names Hare and Lunar Strategy as the first two outside businesses running on Turtle’s tools. Money changed hands for delivered work, so I read it as a demand signal.
$TURTLE is the single instrument tied to coordination access on Turtle.
Network activity and token utility can be related, but revenue is not automatically distributed to tokenholders.
Tokenized assets other than stablecoins stood at $46.1B on 4 November.
The layer that connects them to capital is still needed, and that is the side I am watching.
NFA / DYOR 👇
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/turtledotxyz/status/21…
Ryu retweeted
When I see 11 percent APY my first question is always the same. Where does it come from.
I looked at the @grvt_io vault structure.
→ Target is 11 percent
→ Four independent yield sources
→ No single strategy takes more than a third of the vault
The sources are real world asset financing, tokenized fixed income, crypto credit and market neutral strategies.
What interests me is not the number itself but how it is split.
Understanding how a return is generated matters more than chasing the highest percentage.
I am keeping an eye on this side.
NFA DYOR.
High yield isn’t a myth. Questionable yield sources are the real problem.
Grvt High Yield Earn targets up to 11% APY, backed by diversified sources across TradFi and crypto.
Compare the numbers below, then see the product for yourself:
grvt.io/a/g/dccj39u4
When I see 11 percent APY my first question is always the same. Where does it come from.
I looked at the @grvt_io vault structure.
→ Target is 11 percent
→ Four independent yield sources
→ No single strategy takes more than a third of the vault
The sources are real world asset financing, tokenized fixed income, crypto credit and market neutral strategies.
What interests me is not the number itself but how it is split.
Understanding how a return is generated matters more than chasing the highest percentage.
I am keeping an eye on this side.
NFA DYOR.
High yield isn’t a myth. Questionable yield sources are the real problem.
Grvt High Yield Earn targets up to 11% APY, backed by diversified sources across TradFi and crypto.
Compare the numbers below, then see the product for yourself:
grvt.io/a/g/dccj39u4
Ryu retweeted
🎬 CREATE. CLASH. CONQUER.
Ready to become an Endless Clash Creator? ⚔️
Join our Creator Program and compete for a share of the $500 Reward Pool! 🏆
How to Participate?
1- Create Content – Create engaging videos featuring Endless Clash.
2- Get Your Affiliate Link – If you want to create videos, request your unique affiliate link by emailing supportendlessclash@gmail.com .
3- Share Your Content – Publish your content using the affiliate link provided by our team and use #endlessclash and #web3gaming tag .
4- Submit Your Link – Add the link to your published post or video to this form. forms.gle/HQS5XmKcLczAKeFM6
⏳ Participation Period: 10 Days
💰 Total Rewards: $500
🎁 Reward Distribution: 2–3 weeks after the program ends.
#EndlessClash #CreatorProgram #GamingCreator #MobileGaming
🤖 Made with AI
Ryu retweeted
Avail'in şu paylaşımını görünce aklıma @primus_labs geldi.
Hyperliquid'de işlemlerini takip eden botların sana ekstra maliyet çıkarabilmesi garip geldi açıkçası :)
ShieldTX'in araştırmasına göre incelenen 7 büyük trader'da copy-trading ile ilişkili medyan %0,63'lük bir fiyat dezavantajı hesaplanmış.
Düşününce aslında çok da şaşırtıcı değil. Cüzdanın herkese açıksa pozisyonların da başkaları için veri haline geliyor.
Bir süredir kullandığım primus labs da BNB Chain üzerinde FHE ile bakiye ve transfer tutarlarını gizleme tarafında çalışıyor.
Tabii Hyperliquid'deki bot meselesini doğrudan çözmüyorlar ama ikisi de aynı soruyu düşündürüyor.
Şeffaflık güzel de bütün finansal hareketlerimizin herkese açık olması gerçekten gerekli mi?
AVAIL enters the Hyperliquid ecosystem with @ShieldTXxyz
Why Hyperliquid, and why now?
Hyperliquid is where a lack of privacy costs large traders on every trade, and public exposure is holding back desks and funds who want to trade there.
After screening 332,317 wallets over 30 days, ShieldTX studied the impact of copy-trading on seven top perp traders and found a median execution loss of 63 bps per trade.
Hyperliquid can't capture the flow that needs privacy while every position remains public. ShieldTX routes that flow to @HyperliquidX, with the enterprise-grade privacy large traders need.
We've spent months speaking with whales, trading desks, market makers and digital asset funds who want to use the platform without the public exposure. They want privacy from competitors and copy-bots, without giving up compliance.
The current solutions aren't enough:
• Hyperliquid sub-accounts link to the main account onchain
• Multi-wallet rotation gets exposed by Arkham and other analytics platforms
• Third-party privacy solutions still expose a trader's PnL onchain
ShieldTX is built to close this gap.
Every trade is placed on Hyperliquid from a brand-new Hyperliquid wallet. Nothing links the trade onchain to the trader, and nothing links the trades together. A full trading history is available to users for audits and compliance.
ShieldTX is the on-ramp for crypto-native desks today, and the institutions who come next.
Gm Gm.
When I see a high APY, my first reaction is to ask “where is this coming from?” I looked at @grvt_io High Yield Earn the same way.
It combines corporate invoice financing, tokenized receivables, crypto credit, and market-neutral strategies. None of them takes more than one-third of the vault. That’s the part that matters most to me. If one source breaks, the others can still continue.
The target is 11%. Not guaranteed. Deposits start with a 3.5% base and earnings show up daily. You keep the keys. That’s good, but counterparty and technical risk still exist. Gravity calls it moderate risk. I look at it the same way.
Yield on Margin is coming before the end of November. No fixed lock-up, redemptions are T+5.
I’m still in the same place. I don’t look at the percentage before understanding the source of the yield.
Early access is open if you want it.
Sign up: grvt.io/exchange/sign-up?ref…
Code: CJR2X47
DYOR. Not financial advice.
JUST IN: High Yield Earn is LIVE for whitelisted users.
Up to 11% target diversified yield across TradFi & crypto, with daily payouts and full self-custody.
The bigger unlock is coming soon: the same capital that earns your yield will also back your trades.
One balance. Two jobs.
DM “EARN” for whitelist access.
If you want to make short-term price predictions, @sight_hood is perfect for you.
Sight is an onchain prediction market platform built on @RobinhoodApp.
You connect with your own wallet, take positions with ETH, and results are settled transparently through smart contracts.
The platform never stores your private keys.
Token markets run rounds of 5 minutes, 15 minutes, or 1 hour.
You simply choose UP or DOWN. New positions close roughly 30 seconds before the round ends.
Results are settled transparently via smart contracts, a 2% protocol fee is charged, and winnings must be claimed within 14 days.
There are also AMM markets for NFTs and stocks.
Additionally, the project has a Genesis NFT collection. Holders receive benefits such as early access, a share of platform revenue, and referral rights.
In short, Sight is a platform that brings short-term predictions onchain and transparent.
Fast rounds, clear rules, and wallet control stays with you.
NFA/DYOR
🤝 Paid partnership
Ryu retweeted
When a coin or stock takes off, everyone suddenly says “I knew it.”
But the number of people who actually put money in and opened a position is surprisingly low.
What I’m really interested in is not the entry itself, but what they did after that.
Where did they add to their position?
Did they panic and sell during the drops or hold?
Where did they take profits, and where did they get scared?
@Jeremybtc’s $HYPE position is a great example of this:
→ Long from ~$35, before the low
→ Max drawdown of −44%
→ +182% from entry to peak
With Trade Journeys on @centaur_io, you can see the entire process on a single screen:
The initial analysis and entry price
How they added to the position as the price moved
Whether they sold in panic during sharp drops or held the position
The original post linked to every buy and sell point (with verifiable date and time)
You’re not just seeing who won.
You’re seeing how that person thought and how they handled the tough moments.
To me, this place now feels like a library.
Anyone who wants to learn can come and examine these trades one by one.
🤝 Paid partnership
When a coin or stock takes off, everyone suddenly says “I knew it.”
But the number of people who actually put money in and opened a position is surprisingly low.
What I’m really interested in is not the entry itself, but what they did after that.
Where did they add to their position?
Did they panic and sell during the drops or hold?
Where did they take profits, and where did they get scared?
@Jeremybtc’s $HYPE position is a great example of this:
→ Long from ~$35, before the low
→ Max drawdown of −44%
→ +182% from entry to peak
With Trade Journeys on @centaur_io, you can see the entire process on a single screen:
The initial analysis and entry price
How they added to the position as the price moved
Whether they sold in panic during sharp drops or held the position
The original post linked to every buy and sell point (with verifiable date and time)
You’re not just seeing who won.
You’re seeing how that person thought and how they handled the tough moments.
To me, this place now feels like a library.
Anyone who wants to learn can come and examine these trades one by one.
🤝 Paid partnership
