David

Janice, I worked with both of you at Fox. I saw firsthand how Megyn backed you and helped elevate your career. Watching you publicly trash her now and slap “#meangirl” on it is fucking disgraceful. You can disagree with her without turning a friendship into ammunition for a public pile-on. You should be ashamed of this. @megynkelly, proud to call you my friend. I have your back.

I’ve kept my mouth shut for a long time about #meangirl @megynkelly. She used to be one of my closest friends and then she ghosted me after she endorsed @andrewcuomo for mayor and I told her she broke my heart. Her comments about @1capplegate are disgusting. Having #MS for over 20 years, she knows how long it took for doctors to diagnose me. I think Christina is brave for telling the truth and I’m grateful she became a voice for so many of us. I will have much more to say about this when I’m well enough. I’ve been sick for several weeks in and out of the hospital but when I’m well enough I will comment more. realitytea.com/2026/10/21/me…

Candace offers another masterclass in manipulation. First, she asks me to give her permission to violate the confidentiality provisions of her separation agreement with Daily Wire, which, of course, I cannot do, since I am no longer with Daily Wire and thus have no authority over how they enforce their sundry agreements with her. Note, too, that she wants my permission to drop only “the document where you listed the reasons for my termination.” Candace, as Candace, has access to all of the agreements she has signed. I, as the former CEO of DW, have access to none of them. So even if I could give such permission — I can't — Candace would be free to selectively release only what suits her and serves her narrative. This is selective disclosure dressed up as a demand for transparency. It's heads I win, tails you lose, as it always is with her manipulations. In the end, I suspect she rather enjoys having an NDA with Daily Wire because it allows her to present herself as being muzzled when, in reality, she violates the terms of every contract she ever signs anyway, but only as far as it benefits her. She disparages Daily Wire and Co. all the time, has openly stated that she is not bound by contracts with people she dislikes, and has openly boasted of providing copies of confidential documents to reporters. Again, it's all just one big manipulation. If it were in Candace's interest to “drop the document,” she would. What stops her? Decency? Fear of lawsuits? Egyptian planes? Certainly nothing in those documents materially changes what is already in the public record. I have not been shy about the reasons I fired Candace. The video of my speech to the DW staff that day leaked long ago. I am not ashamed of having fired her. I'm proud of it. She has spent every day since proving me right. She has devoted herself to slander and lies for fame and money. She relishes trying to ruin the lives of others. She is one of the worst actors in public life, and one of the worst people I have ever known. She is not only a liar, but a serial liar. The mistress of lies. I don't defend myself against most of her lies because to repeat them, even for the purpose of correcting them, only gives them greater reach and credibility with her audience. But back to her tactics in this particular message, which are important to understand. “I grow tired of your psychotic fixation with my life” is hilarious, but effective. Hilarious because, of course, Candace is currently making millions of dollars a month off her psychotic fixation with Erika Kirk, TPUSA, and The Jews™. I know I grow tired of that. I guess we'll both just have to resign ourselves to our disappointment. It's effective, though, because it poisons the well. By characterizing my attention to her statements as a “psychotic fixation,” she establishes a frame through which her audience will interpret anything I say in response. My attempts to defend myself become further evidence of my supposed obsession. She is very good at what she does, and what she does is leading so many people down the road to hell… “I have nothing to hide. Do you?” A great closing couplet because it uses a big lie — Candace certainly has plenty to hide — to give power to a tacit accusation. DO YOU? It's a textbook loaded question, but also something of a Kafka trap: the failure to comply with her demand becomes evidence of the very guilt she is insinuating. Obviously if I don’t do the thing she demanded, which she doesn’t even want and which she knows I have no legal authority to do, that means YES! Truly, she's an artist. This is why I say she is better at lying than most people are at discerning truth.

@RealCandaceO blocked a rubber chicken. We built a studio. Today the barnyard clucks back. 🐔📢 GRIFT AWAY — FUNN’s first parody video. CanGrift on the mic. Cluck on guitar and mic Yachty Ape on the mic World premiere. ▶️ FunnNews.com tips + Amazon link to feed Cluck ⚖️ CLUCK VERDICT: Not a sermon. A debut. 🎙️🐔

Coffee Thoughts - When I started this Candace debunking series a year ago it wasn’t because I didn’t like Candace. I watched her for years. I had quit listening to her with Macron and Lively. I thought the Macron one was insane. Maybe it’s not but I didn’t care to listen to it. At the end of her DW days it seemed like all she was doing at that point was attacking people. But they were political podcasters or actors. I didn’t like it but they could fight back. I just chose not to listen to it. After Charlie was murdered it was different. She started attacking innocent people. People that were just at UVU. College kids and families, that wasn’t ok to me. Putting up kids in maroon shirts or families that were just standing there insinuating they were part of the plot to kill someone. That could have been my kids or my family, guess that’s why it hit so hard. One podcast she was showing some kids that gave tv interviews and insinuating they were plants and in on the conspiracy, it really ticked me off. You’re telling a million people to find out who these kids are and that they are part of a murder. They now need protection for nothing more that a 30 second tv interview. Last week we heard from a mom whose family had been attacked. This woman had worked for BLEXIT. She liked Candace until Candace attacked her family. Her husband had to move, her son has been harassed and she’s now in fear for them all. And Candace knew who they were, but she needed them for a segment. Had to make them suspicious all because the son had on a maroon shirt. This week we are finally seeing someone filing a lawsuit. This lawsuit is solid. She insinuated this kid could have been in the stairwell. That he was a foreign Ukraine soldier. A Nazi using an alias. Part of a sleeper cell. She had been told numerous times who Hild was by many people before she aired it but she went on with it anyway. He was just a kid born in Washington, a Mormon, went to school at BYU. He didn’t like social media. His friends had posted pictures of them at the event and videos, not him. His crime was that his grandmas house was on TMZ where Tyler had gone by that day. And he had ran there with his friends after the shooting. But instead of telling her audience that she knew who he was and they had nothing to do with it, she doubled down and insinuated more. Told her audience to pull their kids out of school and that her, Tucker and Alex were all on the Ukrainian hit list that this kid could be a part of. Charlie too. So now her fans think this guy is part of an Ukraine group that wanted to kill her. I had forgot this conspiracy to be honest. I need to add Ukrainians to the Egyptians, French, Mormon Mafias and the Masonic. I don’t remember these three episodes with Hild. But Candace was asking for people to find out who he was, she put him in the crosshairs all along knowing who he was. Just to have a story. I’m going to listen to them and do a recap so we can all see what she said in her words in video. She’s going to get someone hurt or killed. I’ve seen the posts online by her followers and in the comments of her podcasts. They can be violent. They love to dox. They live to harass. She thinks it’s funny. It’s not funny, it’s dangerous. I truly hope there’s 50 more lawsuits dropped from innocent people. I hope TPUSA drops one for each of them individually not as a group. Keep her tied up in litigation paying millions to defend each one. I wonder what George thinks of this. It’s his money too. The issue is many won’t because these lawsuits are expensive for the plaintiff too. And if the lawsuit is dismissed or she’s not found liable, the plaintiff has to pay her attorneys fees and court costs. That’s what stops many people from filing them. They also have to prove she lied intentionally. Otherwise she’s just asking questions. I think that’s wrong, but 1st amendment I guess. Happy Wednesday! Let the drama begin.

Candace Owens says Erika Kirk is Charlie’s biggest betrayer. Her interview with Stephen A Smith spiraled into a full on Erika Kirk hate fest. “While she plays like this sweet puppy she’s nasty behind the scenes.” In the midst of her psychotic Erika Kirk rants Candace even attempted to make herself out to be the real victim. She pretends as if she’s the target of attacks from Erika smack dab in the middle of attacking Erika it’s truly a sight to behold.

Candace lied. She posts she saw the receipt not blurred. Then says to Andrew she’s only seen the receipt that was online, Blurred out. She lied either way. Did she actually see the entire receipt and knows it doesn’t have his name on it but insinuated anyway? Notice she never says Tyler’s name is on it. She’s really good at insinuating but not saying. Why ya always lying Candace? I hear tonight this will be addressed by Andrew Wilson. I think it maybe a sample receipt as @DOCMAGA1 says due to the headless waiter saying he had beer and the receipt saying soda. But if it is a sample receipt why did it have the date and time stamps of 9/10 on it. Wouldn’t it have the date the sample was given. Was it AI’d to that date? Wouldn’t that also mean if it’s a sample that Diligent has the entire sample receipt but blurred out the name on it so he was actually knowingly lying the entire time? Cautiously optimistic on it but I’ll tune in. We shall see. I don’t know if it’s real or not. He could have been there and been back at the college for the interaction with the officer. But the texts between him and Tyler wouldn’t make sense. He says he’s at the college at the time he would have been driving. Who knows. Hopefully all of us tonight.