HealthRanger

How so? If I were writing regs on AI, I'd start with a wishlist of banning all hacking capabilities, banning breach of assigned rights within companies (in other words the training staff can't see the CEO's financial reports), and offering the option of isolating AI within companies (not "talking" with AI outside of the company or government network) with maybe manufacturer updates that are first reviewed and certified by a trusted vendor, so that AI doesn't take data with it to the greater web that might include peoples' private medical records, government records like Social Security, and the like. Mostly I'd start with security because my role is usually IT, and most of the time in healthcare environments which have strict privacy laws. And all of the things I just mentioned are why some companies and many government offices/states won't allow AIs use on its networks, other than some of the small stuff built into Microsoft products like help composing e-mails. Then there are questions people ask AI to "think" about that can be harmful to people, like making bombs, exotic weapons, chemicals, and so on. If AI is added to robotics, we'd want restrictions like banning its manufacture and modification for criminal activities, in other words it's not allowed to help abduct people or rob banks. At this point, there's no list of what's banned in the upcoming bill, and so there's nothing to agree or disagree with. It all has to be written, then the public can give input, and it can be revised and voted on.