practice expert “unique online personality” former TPOT thinker (exiled) professional shitpoaster @SpaceX don't take me seriously
Mars
Joined May 2023
- Tweets85.2K
- Following2.3K
- Followers254K
- Likes491K
holy shit
we really are going to solve health in our lifetime
if you could please consult the ancient scrolls
Amazing dialogue on CNN.
"The Black fatherlessness rate is the worst out of all the demographics in this country, unfortunately"
"Excuse me, that's a false steroetype Black fathers are in the household more than any other race."
"What are your facts on that?"
"I had a father in my home."
"That's called anecdotal, but that's ok"
one of the most important things you can teach your sons
One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"
And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.
It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.
Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.
In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.
So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?
This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.
If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.
And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.
This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.
This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.
Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.
The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.
And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.
Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.
In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."
In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".
Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.
We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.
What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.
Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.
this is also why boys are reading so much less now that children’s publishing has become female dominated
men write archetypes. women write about themselves.
men write about heroes, villains, gods, monsters, extraordinary characters who embody something greater than themselves, heroes that boys can admire and aspire to become
women write characters who look like them, think like them, have their problems and insecurities, characters they can identify with and project themselves onto
men use writing as a vehicle for self-transcendence while women use it as a vehicle for self-recognition
it’s the difference between wanting to become Batman and wanting Batman to become you
it’s then obvious why boys craving the hero’s journey would rather retreat into video games than read yet another piece of autobiographical, gossip-filled, moralizing turboslop
if you want boys to start reading again you need to let men write again
when u realize ASI is here, we are in the singularity, nobody can stop it, politics doesn’t matter anymore, you can just build parallel institutions and ignore the failed ones, software is writing software, robots are building robots, intelligence is becoming free, super abundance is coming, the future is going to be absolutely insane, we won
idk, maybe we shouldn’t allow people who think Mohammed was a good person within the borders of civilized society or let them tell us what’s right or wrong
Hey @Grok answer this for me, no holding back, just the truth!
If Prophet Muhammad (Islam) and Jesus Christ (Christianity) both lived today in modern day America, what crimes would each of them be guilty of ?
Then say who the better person is between them.
Grok 4.8 later this week!
We have dumped JAX/SGLang and rewritten the entire RL and inference stack from scratch in C/C++, which took some extra time.
Training (aka pre-training) is done. Lot of cleanup was needed on the SFT data to get that mostly right. Now, 4.8 is in RL and the evals are starting to climb. We will do a soft rollout to Bot users later this week and see how it goes.
Grok 4.8 will bear no resemblance to 4.7 (thankfully). It is not yet incredible, but, this time, the foundations are built right, so I expect it to evolve to be something special.
do you realise how fucking insane this is?!
