Your heart, brain, and immune system share the same DNA sequence. So how can a single-letter change affect disease in some cells, while sparing the rest? AlphaGenome 2 is our new AI model that zooms in on specific cells to help scientists understand what drives disease. 🧵

Nov 11, 2026 · 3:03 PM UTC

200
349
168
2,371
348,116
RelevantRecentLikes
Looking at a whole tissue at once is like looking at a blurry image: you get the visuals, but miss what’s happening inside individual pixels. Trained on 100M+ profiles across 68 tissues, AlphaGenome 2 focuses on one cell type at a time, spotting nearly twice as many mutations that turn genes on and off as our previous model.
5
17
4
173
15,377
The model also adapts to lab experiments on the fly with no retraining needed. Researchers can plug in data from just a few dozen cells to see how DNA changes behave in specific moments, like: 🔘 Immune cells responding to a vaccine 🔘 Specific cells in the gut driving inflammatory disease 🔘 Stem cells maturing into blood cells
7
7
148
21,716
By predicting how the same DNA is read differently from cell to cell, AlphaGenome 2 opens up entirely new possibilities for understanding human genetics. It’s available now for non-commercial research via our API and interactive Colab tutorials. Find out more → goo.gle/4zikg3w
11
11
4
165
18,896
Dario Amodei's reaction after people clowned on him for saying cancer will be cured:
24
2,033
we really are going to solve health in our lifetime
3
1
95
3,747
Your transcriptome and proteome of different cell types are not the same. The answer to this question is pretty basic. You do not need AI to understand this for the love of god.
1
112
Not for all of us. True for the vast majority, but not for everyone.
131
can you guys use alphagenome to understand Spinal muscular atrophy and find a cure?
143
This is the AI work I’d rather see funded than another chatbot
3
11
1,562
Al Pacino, too, predicts the effects of genetic variants ? Incredible, you never really know a guy
1
139
So, we give our genetic info to strangers who will sell it later like 23&me.
105
Very cool. The future is lives in discovering cell-specific variation, particularly when it comes to treating cancer. Perhaps some seemingly epigenetic diseases can be detected with this kind of methodology.
1
1,185
one letter changes and only some cells get hit. thats the part that gets me. can it say why that cell and not the others?
169
I'm on a longevity plan since March 2025 to get past 100, and I really hope AI can help with that. Zooming in on single cells is the kind of stuff I mean
9
1,738
A new era in medicine is starting!
1
323
this is bigger than gemini decision
1
413
How can we try the model?
86
WTF 🤯 We might be closer to understanding how to treat some of the world's toughest diseases than most people realize. Google just unveiled AlphaGenome 2, an AI that can predict how changing a SINGLE letter in your DNA affects different cells in your body. And in one major test, it identified nearly TWICE as many important genetic variants as its predecessor. This could be a huge step toward understanding what actually drives diseases and finding better treatments. Lemme explain why this is BIG, in simple words 👇 First, here's something pretty wild. Your brain cells, heart cells, immune cells, and almost every other cell in your body contain basically the SAME DNA. Yet they all do completely different things. How?? Think of DNA as a giant instruction manual. Every cell gets the same manual, but each one reads different chapters. Your heart cells follow instructions that help your heart beat. Your immune cells follow instructions that help fight infections. And your brain cells use instructions that help them send signals and process information. Now, DNA doesn't just contain genes. It also contains regulatory regions that work kinda like switches, controlling which genes turn on, when they turn on, and how active they become. Sometimes, changing just ONE letter in your DNA can mess with one of those switches. Here's where things get interesting. The exact same mutation might cause problems in one type of cell while doing almost nothing in another. It could even behave differently in the SAME cell depending on whether that cell is resting or fighting an infection. Same DNA. Same mutation. Different effects. And this is one of the biggest challenges in understanding genetic diseases. Scientists have gotten really good at finding DNA changes associated with diseases. But knowing a mutation is linked to a disease doesn't automatically tell you WHY. Which gene is it affecting? Which cells are involved? Is it making that gene more active or less active? And how does that contribute to the disease? Answering these questions can take years of complicated experiments. This is where AlphaGenome 2 comes in. Google's original AlphaGenome could analyze around ONE MILLION DNA letters and predict different kinds of molecular activity. Pretty impressive already. But much of its training data came from whole tissues and lab-grown cell lines. And here's the problem. A tissue contains lots of different types of cells. Take your gut, for example. Some cells absorb nutrients. Others protect the gut lining. And some are immune cells fighting infections. When scientists measure an entire tissue, they're often looking at an average of what all those cells are doing. But what if a mutation only affects ONE specific kind of immune cell? That effect could get buried in the average. It's like trying to figure out which student is struggling when all you can see is the class average. So Google redesigned the model. Instead of looking mainly at broad tissues, AlphaGenome 2 can predict DNA activity in specific cell types and even particular cell states. Researchers can ask: What happens if this DNA letter changes in a brain cell? What about an immune cell? What if that immune cell has just been activated by a vaccine? And the model can predict how the same genetic change might behave differently in each situation. To make this possible, Google used data from more than 107 MILLION individual cell profiles across 68 tissues, alongside other genomic data. That's an insane amount of biological information 😭 But how much better is it actually? Google tested AlphaGenome 2 on a dataset covering 28 types of human immune cells. At a strict 90% precision threshold, the previous model, even after being adapted to single-cell data, identified 16% of the tested likely causal genetic variants. AlphaGenome 2 identified 30%. And when predicting whether variants increase or decrease gene activity, its coverage at 90% accuracy jumped from 23% to 43%. Nearly TWICE as many important effects identified at those high-confidence thresholds. But the example that really caught my attention involved inflammatory bowel disease. It's a condition where parts of your digestive system become chronically inflamed. Researchers had previously discovered that a particular DNA variant can increase the activity of a gene called ETS2, which plays an important role in inflammation. Here's the crazy part. The mutation wasn't even inside that gene. It was in a regulatory region hundreds of thousands of DNA letters away. And it mainly affected macrophages, a type of immune cell found in the gut. So Google tested whether AlphaGenome 2 could reproduce this already-known mechanism. And the model singled out the exact variant. It predicted that the mutation would increase ETS2 activity specifically in the relevant gut macrophages, while leaving other cell types and genes largely unaffected. That's actually wild. One tiny DNA change. A gene located far away. A complicated inflammatory disease. And the AI connected the variant to the right gene AND the relevant cells. Now, this wasn't a brand-new disease discovery. Scientists had already established this mechanism experimentally. But the fact that AlphaGenome 2 could reproduce it computationally is what makes this exciting. Imagine using this to investigate genetic changes scientists DON'T understand yet. Instead of testing countless possibilities, researchers could narrow down which variants, genes, and cells deserve attention first. And there's another upgrade that's pretty interesting. AlphaGenome 2 can adapt to new cell states without retraining the entire model. Researchers can give it gene-activity measurements from just a few dozen cells, and it can use that information to make predictions for those cells. Google demonstrated this using data from a COVID-19 vaccination study. The model distinguished resting immune T cells from activated ones. And it predicted that a genetic variant associated with severe COVID-19 had a stronger effect on gene regulation when those cells were activated. Think about that. A mutation might have a relatively small effect when an immune cell is resting, but a much stronger one when that same cell becomes active. So studying the wrong cell state could mean missing something important. And this is where things get REALLY interesting. Researchers also tested the model on congenital hyperinsulinism, a rare condition where the body releases too much insulin. Certain DNA changes can cause a gene called HK1 to become abnormally active in insulin-producing pancreatic cells. AlphaGenome 2 predicted these effects specifically in pancreatic beta cells rather than broadly across unrelated cell types. Again, it reproduced an already-known disease mechanism. But imagine applying this to rare genetic disorders whose underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. Or Alzheimer's disease. Scientists have identified genetic variants associated with increased risk, but figuring out exactly which brain cells those variants affect and which genes they regulate is much harder. A model like this could help narrow down the most promising explanations. The same applies to autoimmune diseases, where the immune system mistakenly attacks the body's own tissues. Understanding how specific genetic changes affect particular immune cells could reveal biological mechanisms that researchers might otherwise overlook. And then there's drug discovery. This might be one of the biggest long-term implications. Finding a gene linked to a disease doesn't automatically tell scientists how to treat it. They need to understand what that gene is doing, which cells are involved, and whether changing its activity might actually help. If AI can help answer those questions more accurately, researchers could potentially identify promising drug targets that might otherwise be overlooked. But finding a drug target isn't the same as finding a cure. Scientists still need to develop medicines, test their safety, and establish whether they actually work. Understanding what's going wrong is just an important first step. Google has also generated predictions for nearly 7 MILLION genetic variants across hundreds of human cell and tissue conditions. Basically, researchers now have an enormous map of predicted genetic effects they can explore. And AlphaGenome 2 can even estimate certain missing molecular measurements using biological information already available. This could help scientists decide which expensive laboratory experiments are actually worth doing next. The model is also available through an API for non-commercial academic research, allowing researchers to explore and test its capabilities. Now obviously, this doesn't mean we're suddenly going to cure cancer, Alzheimer's, or every genetic disease tomorrow lol. These are still AI predictions, not proof. The model can miss important genetic effects, and scientists still need real experiments to confirm what it predicts. It's not approved for medical diagnosis either. But think about the bigger picture. For decades, we've been getting better and better at reading DNA. We've sequenced genomes, discovered millions of genetic differences, and found countless links between those differences and diseases. But there's always been this huge gap between knowing that a mutation is associated with a disease and understanding what it's actually DOING inside the body. That's the gap AlphaGenome 2 is helping close. We're moving from: "This part of your DNA is linked to this disease." Toward: "This specific DNA change might affect THIS gene, in THESE cells, in THIS particular way." And that's a completely different level of understanding. Imagine a future where researchers can investigate the predicted effects of a mysterious mutation across hundreds of cell types. They could narrow down which cells are most affected, which genes might be involved, and which biological mechanisms deserve further investigation. Instead of spending years figuring out where to look, they could potentially get to the most promising experiments much faster. That's what excites me about this. Not that AI has suddenly found cures. But that it's becoming a powerful tool for understanding the biology behind diseases. Think about how much biological data we're collecting right now. Researchers around the world are mapping the human body cell by cell. We're learning what different cells do, how they change, and how they behave during disease. And now AI is getting better at connecting all that information to the genetic changes that influence those cells. We've gone from discovering the structure of DNA, to sequencing the human genome, to identifying mutations associated with diseases. And now we're building AI models that can predict how those mutations affect specific cells. Not perfectly. Not for every disease. And definitely not without more experiments. But the progress is real. We've spent decades learning how to READ the code of life. Now we're getting better at predicting how different cells actually USE that code. And if we keep improving our understanding of what goes wrong inside our cells, we might get a whole lot better at figuring out how to fix it. What a time to be alive 🔥
1
6
1,320
same dna everywhere but one letter only hits certain cells, biology is wild man
1
846
same DNA, different cell, different outcome. biology has had env vars all along
1
1
1
263
▲ Google DeepMind just released AlphaGenome 2, a DNA model that predicts variant effects in specific cell types instead of tissue averages. The key idea is conditioning. The model reads 1 Mb of DNA plus 1 target condition, a tissue, cell type or cell state. A 256-d embedding modulates the encoder, transformer and decoder. You can also build that condition from raw scRNA-seq counts, with no fine-tuning. On TenK10K single-cell eQTLs, it recovers 30% of causal variants at 90% precision. AlphaGenome 1 fine-tuned on single-cell data recovers 16%. Enhancer-gene AUPRC is 0.78 vs 0.73. It is a trade-off though: outside accessible chromatin, sign prediction AUROC tops out at 0.63. Available now via the AlphaGenome API, free for non-commercial research. . Full analysis: marktechpost.com/2026/11/11/… Paper: storage.googleapis.com/deepm… Docs: alphagenomedocs.com Blog: deepmind.google/blog/alphage… @GoogleDeepMind @pushmeet @sundarpichai
2
210
We need to make sure it’s a worldwide human right to own your own genetic code and the personal tweaks to it still belong to you, not corporations. The generic genetic code that is same for all, that’s also doesn’t belong to corporations, for any species. We’re entering an era where things like this need to be clarified and enshrined worldwide for future generations.
3
568
Same DNA in every cell but the disease only hits some of them, that's always blown my mind. Reckon AlphaGenome 2 gets doctors to the why a whole lot faster.
1
1
397
how do you check a cell-type prediction when the lab data is only a few dozen cells of that type?
2
733
same DNA, completely different behaviour in every cell. so basically an Indian joint family
446
Cool that it's available now, but it's non-commercial research only, via the API and Colab tutorials.
1
653
That ETS2 case is a hard one. In the 2024 Crick study, James Lee's group couldn't separate the candidate variants statistically and needed CRISPR and reporter assays in human macrophages to find the causal one. Getting there from the model is a big shortcut.
1
476
cell type context is where most variant calls fall apart. how's it hold up on rare cells with barely any data?
2
407
Same DNA in every cell and they still can't agree on anything. Sounds like most group chats 😂
1
356
how small a cell population does it resolve before the single letter gets averaged away
308
68 tissues, one dna sequence. same recipe, 68 kitchens, wildly different soup
295
@grok can we use this in privacy mode with no data collection
1
236
@grok what does this mean eli5
1
86
@grok how can someone use this? What are practical use cases and what is needed?
1
222
This is amazing stuff!
2