
Editor-in-chief of @AllRiseNews. Fearless journalism about the law, your rights, and the great work of repairing US democracy.
- Tweets64K
- Following4K
- Followers279K
- Likes41.2K

ALT "Beyond being inconsistent with the clear, well-recognized constitutional limitations on your investigative functions, threats to executive branch officials designed to deter them from public service, or process designed merely to abuse or instill fear in the recipient may cross the line into blatant criminality. And issuing unlawful subpoenas with the intention of depriving citizens of their constitutional rights and privileges may warrant further investigation."

ALT Let us not mince words: This lawsuit was filed at the behest of President Trump. In response to a question from the press about the filing of this litigation, President Trump stated unequivocally: “I’m the one that said do it.”4 But the say-so—and the political purposes—of an executive official, no matter how powerful, are not the law. See U.S. Const. art. III. The desire of powerful officials to try to achieve some result through the legal process does not turn a frivolous legal argument into a colorable one.






















