PTS

POV: you with that one person who doesn't care how weird you are. 😝 Swordcat ⚔️ Knight 🛡️

You said you wanted the truth… But you never wanted mine. You already had your story… Before I walked inside. I sat across the table, trying to explain, Every word I gave you, you turned into blame. I thought that you would listen, thought you’d understand, Never knew my future was already in your hands. I told you where I’d been, I told you what I knew, But every time I answered, you said it wasn’t true. I came into that room believing I was free, Never knew the story had no place for me. You kept on asking questions, But you didn’t want replies. How could I ever tell the truth, When you already wrote the lies? You already wrote the lies, Before you looked into my eyes. I gave you all the truth I had, But you buried it alive. I thought that you’d believe me, I thought you’d hear my cries. How can I ever prove I’m innocent, When you already wrote the lies? My mind don’t work the way you think, Sometimes I need a little time. But every pause became a reason, Every fear became a sign. You took the words I couldn’t find, And filled the silence with your own. Made a stranger out of someone, Who just wanted to go home. You called it an investigation, But it felt like a disguise. You weren’t searching for the answers, You were building up the lies. I kept believing someone, Would finally see my side. But every door was closing, Every time I testified. You already wrote the lies, Before you looked into my eyes. I gave you all the truth I had, But you buried it alive. I thought that you’d believe me, I thought you’d hear my cries. How can I ever prove I’m innocent, When you already wrote the lies? If you knew it wasn’t me, Why’d you make me take the blame? If you knew the truth was different, Why’d you put me in that frame? I trusted you to protect me, I trusted you to be fair. But the moment that I needed you, It felt like no one cared. You already wrote the lies! Before you looked into my eyes! I gave you all the truth I had, But you buried it alive! I thought that you’d believe me! I thought you’d hear my cries! How can I ever prove I’m innocent, When you already wrote the lies? You said you wanted the truth… I gave you every word. But you already had your answer… Before my voice was heard. My name is Brian Cole Junior… And I know what I didn’t do. #FreeBrianColeJr

Here it is, in his own words, the host of @MrsErikaKirk's event on Friday, claiming the resurrection of over 50 dead people. 🤯😱💀 In fact, Wommack claims 4 or 5 people have been raised from the dead right there on the campus where @tpusafaith is holding this week's roadshow.

backstory of cat with a sword

‼️Nick Shirley CAUGHT Lying About Being In New York The Day Charlie Was ASSASSINATED — And It BLOWS UP Andrew Kolvet's Only Alibi 😱 Nick Shirley was NOT in New York City on September 10th. He was in Utah. A video he posted from the Orem train station that same day catches the ticket agent announcing the location over the PA system in the background — the audio places him minutes from where Charlie Kirk was shot. The next day, September 11th, he films himself at Salt Lake City International Airport, and the scenery outside the window matches public photos of that terminal exactly. Two clips. Two days. Same state. That single fact destroys the story he has repeated: that he had already gone back to New York, and that the segment he did with Andrew Kolvet on The Charlie Kirk Show that morning was live. If Nick was standing in Utah on the 10th and again on the 11th, the interview could not have been live. And if it was not live, the one real-time alibi Andrew Kolvet has ever offered for his own movements that morning evaporates. It gets worse. Nick says Charlie texted him the night of the 9th inviting him onto the show on Thursday the 11th — and that he had originally planned to livestream the UVU event in person before "last-minute obligations" forced him to New York. But Charlie himself was scheduled to be at Charis Bible College in Colorado on the 11th. So why is Charlie trying to book Nick for an interview on a day Charlie already had somewhere else to be? And why does the screenshot Nick released show only a partial thread, cut off exactly where the useful part of the conversation would be? Then there is the part almost nobody has clocked. In that September 10th train station video, Nick is already pushing the fed-slop line — radical leftists, Antifa, blame the left — before a single fact about the shooter or the motive was public. Not hours later. Not after a briefing. On the day, on camera, before the evidence existed. Put it together and it stops looking like a coincidence. It looks like Nick Shirley was inserted into the Charlie Kirk timeline to sell the official story to Gen Z before anyone could check it, and to help manufacture an alibi for Andrew Kolvet while he was at it. That is not organic journalism. That is a jacketed asset doing precisely what it was placed there to do. And here is your update: Nick Shirley says this is all false. So I asked him for the originals of the photos he claims debunk me, so the metadata could be verified. He refused. He has the files. He has the timestamps. He will not hand them over. You tell me what that means. Nick Shirley's public answer to all of this is that it's false. Fine. Good. That is exactly what a correction is for — so I went to him privately and asked for the one thing that settles it either way: the original uncompressed files, so the metadata could be checked by someone who actually knows what he's looking at. Here is what happened. He opened with confidence: "Yes 100% I filmed it at JFK before I went to the UK." I told him if it checks out, I will apologize and correct the record publicly. He replied, "Yes a correction deserves to be served." So I asked for the files. Original, uncompressed, straight from the camera roll — WeTransfer, Dropbox, anything, to an email address. Nothing exotic. Just the files. What came back was a screenshot of the Photos app. A screen recording of a video player. Four photos pasted into the chat. And one file preview captioned "John F. Kennedy International… September 11, 2025 9:39 PM." Every one of those is a copy of a copy. Re-saved, re-compressed, stripped. A screenshot of a screenshot carries no camera metadata at all. It carries whatever the phone decided to write on the label — which is precisely the thing under dispute. So he has handed me the claim again, not the evidence for it. And here is where his own defense starts to break. His version is now: "I had an office in NYC that I lived in at that time and was in NYC by Sept 7 and then left for the UK on the 12th." Except there is a clip of him at the Orem train station on the 10th, with the ticket agent calling out the location over the PA. So which is it — New York from the 7th, or Utah on the 10th? Both cannot be true without a same-day cross-country round trip that nobody has produced a boarding pass for. Look at the airport clip he sent as proof. The label on the file says JFK, 9:39 PM on September 11th. The scenery outside that window is Salt Lake City. He is using a file tagged one airport to prove he was at the other. He says the timeline is wrong. He has the originals. He will not send them. "A correction deserves to be served" — then serve it. A screenshot is not metadata. A label is not a timestamp. And a guy who is this confident should not be this hard to get a file out of. CC: @AndrewKolvet

🚨🚨 MAJOR BOMBSHELL: THE BAGLEY BROTHERS CHRIS BAGLEY, FORMER UVU POLICE OFFICER, AND MICHAEL BAGLEY, UTAH FIREFIGHTER, PARAMEDIC, CPR-TRAINED FIRST RESPONDER & ACTOR! REMEMBER CHRIS BAGLEY? The former UVU police officer who testified that his bodycam stopped recording while investigating the rooftop where the fatal shot was believed to have originated? His explanation? “I think my battery died. I don’t know.” HOW CONVENIENT! But HOLD ON, because the bodycam wasn’t the ONLY questionable detail that emerged from his testimony. LET’S REVISIT WHAT ELSE HAPPENED. His bodycam stopped recording during a critical crime-scene investigation. He testified that he found NO spent shell casings during his initial rooftop search. He encountered an armed individual with a badge whose identity he did not know. He discovered a red-and-black screwdriver and disturbed gravel resembling a possible firing position. He reportedly discovered an empty pistol holster near the shooting scene, raising questions about evidence preservation. And he did NOT return to the rooftop after his bodycam was charged, citing the chaotic situation. BUT HERE’S ANOTHER IMPORTANT DETAIL STRAIGHT FROM PAGE 42 OF THE UVU AFTER-ACTION REPORT! On September 10, 2025, at approximately 11:00 a.m., Dan Flood requested that the Hall of Flags elevated pedestrian walkway be secured. CHIEF LONG, SERGEANT BEVERIDGE, AND OFFICER CHRIS BAGLEY WENT TO THE WALKWAY. The report specifically states: “Sergeant Beveridge and Officer Bagley remained in that area to secure it through the time of the shooting.” SO CHRIS BAGLEY WASN’T JUST AN OFFICER WHO INVESTIGATED THE ROOFTOP AFTERWARD. HE WAS ALSO PERSONALLY ASSIGNED TO SECURE AN ELEVATED AREA DURING THE EVENT! A bodycam interruption. Questions about evidence preservation. An unidentified armed individual. And an officer assigned to elevated-area security who later investigated the suspected firing location BUT WAIT… REMEMBER THE UVU AFTER-ACTION REPORT? It documents an OREM FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPTAIN ASSISTING WITH CPR ON CHARLIE KIRK AT TIMPANOGOS HOSPITAL. NOW HERE’S WHERE THINGS GET INTERESTING! MEET MICHAEL S. BAGLEY! FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC CPR-TRAINED EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL His paramedic role involves emergency resuscitation training and lifesaving procedures. PROFESSIONAL ACTOR — Talent Management Group. UVU GRADUATE Class of 2017. BYU-AFFILIATED ACTING CREDITS Including Dust. HEALTH INSURANCE AGENT Uinta Life & Health. FILM AND TELEVISION CREDITS — Including Our Father’s Keeper, Resurgence of the Coin, and Alien Abductions with Abby Hornacek. And social media photographs with Utah firefighters. imdb.com/name/nm10322100/?_s…

Skepti endorses SPYTE 🕷️ Social media built by the people for the people.

The issue at hand is: Who Killed Charlie Kirk? Focus on that. Let's get that question honestly answered.

I didn’t follow J6 so I had nooooo clue about any of it’s history. When Brian was arrested it threw our world into a tornado that has yet to calm 💔. December was a VERY SCARY TIME WHEN WE DIDN’T HAVE FACTS, only what the government put out. @KyleSeraphin and @CaraCastronuova would not us rest until we understood the set up and knew of all the work @SteveBakerUSA and team had done. @NobleOne told us to go on X to see the support Brian had because we felt we were fighting in uncharted territory alone. To my surprise, I was overwhelmed and my heart filled with joy (I still am) to the love and support sent our way when I created a profile for him. Everyone that has fought and spoken out for Brian, known and unknown, are living proof from God to assure me my faith in Him is real. I had to hand this HUGE BURDEN TO HIM to ensure I made no mistakes with my baby’s life. I am eternally GRATEFUL AND THANKFUL beyond words for everyone’s kind words, prayers, sharing Brian’s case and donations. This is way out of our realm and all of you have made it bearable. I’m also extremely grateful for our law teams that are diligent, meticulous and working so hard that, IMO, the government is trying to have them kicked off Brian’s case (I hope I’m wrong on this but….). Love you all and thank you for the love you have shown Brian and our family. 🫶🏾

Thank you Billie for your support and sharing. I read everyone’s comment as of the time of this post, and we appreciate your support as well. I agree. IMO, Brian’s story is being suppressed and shadowbanned. However, those efforts will not prevail. Despite the suppression, Brian’s supporters are helping keep his case trending and bringing awareness to his story. If everyone could take a moment to share his story or even one post, it would make a tremendous difference in spreading awareness. Every share matters.

Russell Brand used to be a darling of the media celebrity industrial complex - Netflix specials, starred in major releases, and A-list comedy shows What changed? Russell hosted a podcast with Tucker and started speaking out against the war machine and the vaccine. Big no-no - for that, they will ruin your life.

Once again, proving he cares nothing about @charliekirk11

She's talking about Cholula and Louisiana Hot Sauce, you reptile. Those were Charlie's favorites. Why did you completely invent this quote to a year old clip? Why did you put it in quotes as if she actually said that? But let's be very clear here. Richard Haninia is a snake. I wouldn't be surprised if he literally slithers. He lies through his forked tongue. What's even more pathetic is that Charlie was kind to you, Richard. He wanted to help promote your new book and had you on his show, just after you got doxxed. But that's what snakes do. They repay generosity by smearing your widow after you're gone. Cut the snakes out of your life.

Brian Cole Jr. Trial: Circumstantial Evidence Cannot Deny Someone Their Constitutional Right to Counsel of Their Choosing 1. The FBI began investigating a CIA officer. They performed a gait analysis on her that could not rule her out. They administered a polygraph that indicated deception regarding whether she planted the pipe bombs. The polygraph interviewer noted that her answers explaining why she failed seemed rehearsed. 2. The FBI ruled the CIA officer out based on a single piece of circumstantial evidence: a time-stamped video that merely contained the voice of the officer. That video, which was recorded on an iPhone 7, appears to have been transferred to an iPhone 12 and provided to the FBI with consent from the iPhone 12. Because the video cannot directly show the presence of the CIA officer, the video itself constitutes circumstantial evidence. 3. The defense seeks to present an alternate-perpetrator case based on the same evidence the FBI developed against the CIA officer. A voice heard on video, timestamped or not, cannot establish presence, leaving the FBI’s investigation incomplete. The defense is seeking the circumstantial evidence surrounding the video, much of which the FBI never obtained—such as acquiring video from the home where the officer is heard on the recording. 4. To avoid providing this material, the prosecution is seeking to remove Brian Cole Jr.’s constitutional right to an attorney of his choosing. Based on circumstantial evidence alone, they claim that no one could possibly believe the CIA officer is innocent; therefore, the lawyers are acting against Cole’s best interests. To establish this idea, they present a derivative file that merely contains a voice, which cannot, in itself, imply presence. Knowing that the video itself is wholly inadequate to establish innocence, they have introduced additional circumstantial evidence, such as a text from the officer saying they were “coming home!” that occurred 24 minutes before the officer actually drove off. 5. On one hand, the prosecution wants to use circumstantial evidence to bolster their chief piece of circumstantial evidence. On the other hand, they seek to deny the defense that same body of circumstantial evidence from which they are drawing. If that body of circumstantial evidence demonstrated the officer’s innocence, then why not provide it to the lawyers? The prosecution claims that Litson is acting against Cole’s interests so that they can bolster their civil defamation case. But if the circumstantial evidence shows that the officer is innocent, how would that bolster the civil case? The fact is that this body of evidence cannot act asymmetrically. It will either weaken both the civil and criminal cases, or strengthen both the civil and criminal cases. Apparently, the DOJ is not willing to let the evidence speak for itself—and that is likely because it cannot speak for itself.

Hey wait.. No let her stay this is all entertainment

They thought we were going to stop talking about the Carbine rifle that was walked out from the Charlie Kirk assassination crime scene on the morning of 9/11/25 👀 The eye witnesses who took video of Russell Kennington's arrest confirm IT WAS A RIFLE with an evidence tag. 🫡👇🏻

WOW! They posted a FABRICATED Orem PD REPORT TO try & BURY a 2ND RIFLE found at CHARLIE KIRK'S CRIME SCENE, using excerpts of available court records in Russell Kennington's court case 👀 Here's what an ACTUAL Orem PD GRAMA request and OFFICIAL response looks like. 👇🏻 Enjoy! 🫡