Priyanka Y

Peak Detailing of Ramayana: Part 1 (2026) 1. Showing Anasuya as Rishi Agastya's wife instead of Rishi Atri's wife. (Anasuya was the wife of Atri; Agastya's wife was Lopamudra.) 2. Dasharatha using spoons. 3. Sita reprimanding Lakshmana for cutting off Surpanakha's nose. 4. Rama being portrayed as someone who gets fooled by Surpanakha's deception. 5. Making Ravana's abduction of Sita appear primarily as an act of revenge for his sister, rather than giving due importance to his lust and obsession with Sita. 6. Giving Ravana so much glorification, screen presence and larger-than-life treatment that one almost wonders whether the film is Ramayana or Ravanayana! 7. Almost zero chemistry between Ranbir Kapoor and Sai Pallavi. Where is the tenderness and divine companionship that should define Rama and Sita? 8. A.R. Rahman's Sufi/Qawwali-influenced musical treatment. 9. Sita's reaction to Jatayu's brutal sacrifice feeling strangely muted. Jatayu gave his life trying to protect her. IT ISN'T OUR ITIHAASA.

Sales is everyone’s job once you reach a certain point

Chinese Misinformation Propganda against India. Bangladeshi journalist followed and posed questions to Chinese Nationals recording video of slums in Dhaka calling it India falsely. Chinese Nationals evade and run away from these questions. Watch:

BYE.

Major cheat code in life: Master the graceful exit. From conversations. From parties. From opportunities. “This has been wonderful, but I need to go.” No elaborate excuses. No fake emergencies. Just clear kind departure. Most people don’t know how to leave. They stay too long or leave badly. Master the exit.

Watch this clip from Japanese adaptation of ramayan How accurately sita haran is depicted here But our own Indian director needed to make it controversial Apologitic hinduism will lead it to its grave

Jensen Huang getting caught with a suspected Chinese spy is not a national security crisis. It's the greatest liquidity event in market history. He's running the Lou Pai Enron playbook to perfection. How do you dump billions in $NVDA at the absolute peak of the AI bubble without spooking the tape or triggering an SEC/DOJ insider trading? You get a divorce judge to legally force you to liquidate the position. Zero regulatory blowback. Generational bag secured. 🏆 Undisputed GOAT. Regulators hate this one simple trick.

The movie Ramayana tells us more about Indian politics than the story of Lord Rama. Trace the intellectual trail. Who advised the film? Meet Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra. PhD in Hindi literature. Pen name: Bodhisattva. A Buddhist Name. In Buddhism, ‘Bodhisattva’ means one seeks awakening for others. Interesting name. His writings: 2007. He accused Ayodhya's Ikshvakus of injustice to women. 2008. A controversial article on Rama and Sita. Questioning Rama. Highlighting Sita's suffering. He claimed Rama ate meat. And drank alcohol. He even claimed Rama offered alcohol to Pregnant Sita. 2024. He Wrote “Ayodhya Mein Kaalpurush.” He potrayed Epics through power, suffering and injustice. 2026. Credited as research consultant on this ₹4,000 crore Ramayana. Now let's trace the ideas. Ancient Jain literature. Paumacariya reimagines Ravana from a moral lens. A mere whitewash of Ravana. Ancient Buddhist literature. Lankavatara Sutra depicts Ravana seeking Buddha's teachings. Again whitewash Ravana. 1873. Jyotirao Phule. Aryan conquest. Indigenous resistance. Caste oppression. 1900s. Babasaheb Ambedkar. Questioned Rama through caste, gender and justice. 1956. Periyar. Ravana as Dravidian hero. Rama as northern domination. Modern Bahujan interpretations. Some portray Ravana as indigenous. Oppressed. A symbol of resistance. Now go back further. Ancient Zoroastrianism. Asuras are revered. Devas are rejected. Later, from the same source came Indo-European theories. The Aryan invasion narrative. Different traditions. Different centuries. Different politics. One recurring theme. Oppressor versus oppressed. Return to the movie. An oppressed Ravana. Devas as oppressors. A subdued Rama. Not merely cinematic creativity. An interpretation millions absorb. In India, oppression narratives fuel identity politics. Identity politics becomes vote-bank politics. This framing recalls modern politics, not Valmiki's Ramayana. Don't make this film children's primary source for Valmiki's Ramayana. The danger isn't just on screen. It's what millions may believe was written in the original.

RaGa (1970 born) appears around 10 years old and they receive a phone call about Rajiv Gandhi leading in an election. It has to be 1981 Amethi bye-election that Rajiv fought because Sanjay Gandhi died a year earlier. Menaka Gandhi, Sanjay's widow, can be seen in the video. The following year she walked out of Indira's house, and in the subsequent election in 1984, she fought against Rajiv Gandhi from Amethi but lost due to sympathy vote in wake of Indira's assassination. The begging of that distance among the family members can also be seen in the video, apart from the privilege.

Lost money can be found. Lost time is lost forever. Protect what matters most.

3) $NVDA vouches for Megaspeed - its largest SEA chip buyer, under U.S. and Singapore investigation - as having no Chinese ownership and free of diversion concerns. We uncovered documents, however, that suggest Megaspeed was financed by Alibaba through a Singapore shell company.

BREAKING: Nvidia, $NVDA, CEO Jensen Huang sends a company-wide email regarding his recently reported relationship with a Chinese spy.

What a fall for a generational entrepreneur. What is with tech billionaires and cheating Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Eric Schmidt, Jensen Huang 😨

A meeting is rarely called a meeting anymore. It’s an alignment exercise, brainstorming session, strategic huddle, touchpoint, calibration discussion, deep dive or even a hackathon. Anything to avoid admitting that 10 people have gathered to discuss what one person could have decided in 10 minutes!