Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling) header
Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling) profile picture

CEO @ Detained in Dubai & Due Process International. Interpol & Extradition Expert, Podcast Host, Expert Witness, Crisis Manager, Human Rights, Media & PR.

Joined June 2009
Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)Photo by Radha Stirling (@RadhaStirling)
I believe my client, Tara Reade, was sexually assaulted by Joe Biden. She lodged a complaint at the time. She verbalised “stop it” and he did. She was not anonymous. Russell Brand accusers are anonymous and the allegations dubious. Head in lap?! Laughable!
5
3
1
47
1,112
A verdict should not be 100% assumed to be accurate. It is the outcome of an imperfect system. Miscarriages of justice occur on a regular basis. That’s why we have an appeals system and the term “wrongful conviction”. Juries are people.
Judge reproaches defendant for "instructing" his lawyers to cross-examine government witnesses accusing him of crimes, as though there is something malevolent about this. Completely insane: but all you have to do is scream RAPE, and every normal standard goes right out the window
55
35
3
224
7,321
If we accept anonymous accusers, mud-slinging prosecutions, conjoined unrelated and trivial cases designed to slander the accused in front of a jury, governments all over the world will have a playbook to destroy dissent. This is why the Russell Brand case matters.
🤖 Made with AI
244
483
25
1,791
17,511
Just broke down the Russell Brand trial issues with Mike Ryan @pulsenewstalk - We cannot prejudice defendants for a perceived “greater good” or justice becomes a political weapon.
3
13
54
2,137
20% of adult women have been prescribed antidepressants in Britain. That is unacceptably high and dangerous. Women need to seek non-medical solutions before they are irreparably damaged by the drug industry.
🤖 Made with AI
4
1
1
12
700
Russell Brand is serving a prison sentence for resting his head on a woman’s lap 20 years ago.
🤖 Made with AI
26
26
1
109
2,402
Russell Brand's ex, Georgina Baillie, says the mainstream media tried to persuade her to "bend to the narrative". How many more women has this happened to? Activism investigations that cross the line to solicit false testimony need to be investigated.
66
300
20
1,563
31,891
The anonymous accuser licked the celebrity’s anus after a comedy show in a threesome while cheating on her boyfriend. She then discussed anal with Russell Brand over text before going to have sex with him. Her boyfriend says she “resisted” anal sex then “surrendered”. 2 decades later she has him jailed for 9 years?
.@MegynKelly: "10 years on something she didn't come forward over for 22 years? This is CRAZY..."
144
665
35
3,797
213,870
Russell Brand: False accusers: Jemma Beale, England, 2017, Eleanor Williams, England, 2023, Stacey Sharples, England, 2026, Laura Hood, England, 2019 but we are told “most allegations are true”. That may be so but it’s not good enough reason to railroad an accused to prison.
1
6
22
1,525
Astonishing
.@MegynKelly on the absolute double standard in the Russell Brand sentencing: “If you needed any further proof that this is a political WITCH HUNT against Russell Brand, the judge just gave it to us.” Download: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
4
7
17
1,363
Dubai: One month in prison and deportation for a relative sharing a harmless family video of a 5-year-old mispronouncing food on Snapchat? This sentence is extremely harsh and disproportionate. Privacy is important but surely this goes too far in the UAE 📷
70
13
15
159
282,573
No matter what, this is government overreach. They have no business and fuel concerns he was targeted by the powers.
I don't know if Russell Brand is innocent or guilty but I do know this is very, very wrong.
1
3
18
3,151
A take away from the Russell Brand case: Men, choose a good woman, get married and have children. Focus on giving, on service and reap the rewards. Protect yourself from a wasted and risky life of debauchery. I’m sure Russell would agree.
102
3
5
90
9,153
The system is fundamentally unfair & needs reform. Russell Brand's trial has increased public distrust in the process. I suggest mostly removing accuser anonymity (as in the US) & introducing a statute of limitations for most cases voluntarily not reported to the police.
467
123
23
778
32,607
There is good reason to call for the US system of transparency and limitations. This is not contrary to demanding justice and accountability. It supports it both ways.
5
1
12
1,629
England replaced “beyond reasonable doubt” as the requirement for jurors to convict in criminal trials. Now they only need to be “sure.” Russell Brand’s jury got that direction. “Sure” is a word you use about the weather. It doesn’t demand the near-certainty the old standard did. Say both terms out loud and see what I mean.
119
54
12
338
18,041
When we are literally talking about ruining someone’s life and the lives of their children and families, we need to make sure truth is prioritised above the feelings of victims/accusers. End lifelong anonymity for cases like Russell Brand’s. Justice first.
108
28
5
157
7,258
Russell Brand: I know how difficult it is for victims who come forward with sexual assault cases against powerful people. I helped Tara Reade who suffered at the hands of Biden. She came forward publicly and braved the scrutiny. Lifelong anonymity needs review.
6
7
28
2,541
I suggest lifelong anonymity is provided in cases where people are raped by strangers in the park (for example). When it comes down to a he said/she said situation as it has with Russell Brand, there should not be anonymity.
5
8
1
18
1,293
“Believe accusers” in Russell Brand trial despite being completely anonymous with no complaints made at the time (decades ago). Most of the people saying believe the women were the same ones who demonised and refused to believe Tara Reade when she complained of Joe Biden.
36
19
2
117
3,202
Tara had made reports at the time of the encounter with Biden and put her name to the claim even though it caused distress being hounded by Biden supporting media. If anyone thinks politics has nothing to do with this, they are sorely mistaken.
2
3
13
906
When a case is built in the press before anyone is charged, potential jurors absorb the prosecution narrative long before they hear the evidence. Even by osmosis, they can arrive with the sense that their job is to convict. The presumption of innocence is difficult to protect once guilt has become the public expectation
125
145
15
1,011
80,980