Replying to @andybarber654 @quinotaur
Easily dealt with. If it is such a problem, do something about it, but don鈥檛 come and criminally charge 20 years later when even the alleged witnesses in the room won鈥檛 help
馃 Made with AI
1
11
106
If we accept anonymous accusers, mud-slinging prosecutions, conjoined unrelated and trivial cases designed to slander the accused in front of a jury, governments all over the world will have a playbook to destroy dissent. This is why the Russell Brand case matters.
馃 Made with AI
20% of adult women have been prescribed antidepressants in Britain. That is unacceptably high and dangerous. Women need to seek non-medical solutions before they are irreparably damaged by the drug industry.
馃 Made with AI
Russell Brand is serving a prison sentence for resting his head on a woman鈥檚 lap 20 years ago.
馃 Made with AI
A take away from the Russell Brand case: Men, choose a good woman, get married and have children. Focus on giving, on service and reap the rewards. Protect yourself from a wasted and risky life of debauchery. I鈥檓 sure Russell would agree.
Replying to @ImNewHereTwo @mwilliamsthomas
Moron missing the point of fair trials and judicial transparency. I prefer the US system. That does not mean women are being lashed out at. Fool.
1
2
110
There is good reason to call for the US system of transparency and limitations. This is not contrary to demanding justice and accountability. It supports it both ways.
The system is fundamentally unfair & needs reform. Russell Brand's trial has increased public distrust in the process. I suggest mostly removing accuser anonymity (as in the US) & introducing a statute of limitations for most cases voluntarily not reported to the police.













