Red Backpack 🇺🇸✝️🫶🏼

You get what you vote for.

One of the reasons I don’t like socialism is public bathrooms. A public bathroom is about as basic a shared resource as you can get. Everyone gets to use it, and everyone is expected to show a little consideration for the next person. The rules aren’t particularly complicated. And yet, a shocking number of adults can’t even manage to throw their paper towels in the trash. Some will pee all over a toilet seat and leave it for the next person. And the next person, who didn’t make the mess, certainly isn’t going to clean it up either. Now imagine trusting these same people to collectively manage an entire economy. We can’t even get everyone to agree that cleaning up their own pee is a personal responsibility, but somehow we’re supposed to believe everyone will become hardworking, responsible, and considerate when we’re sharing the fruits of each other’s labor. Now, compare your average public restroom to a Buc-ee’s bathroom. Buc-ee’s figured something out. Clean bathrooms attract customers. Customers spend money. So the company has a financial incentive to keep those bathrooms spotless. They hire people to maintain them, hold employees accountable, and compete for your business. And people will literally plan their road trips around stopping there. That’s capitalism. Someone recognized a problem, found a way to solve it, and made money because people valued the result. Of course, not everyone contributes equally to society. Some people work harder, make better decisions, and take more responsibility. Others seem perfectly content making life more difficult for everyone around them. I believe people should have the freedom to live however they choose. I also believe in helping people who genuinely need it. But I have a hard time accepting an economic philosophy that expects me to trust everyone to act in the collective interest when some people can’t be bothered to clean up after themselves. Buc-ee’s figured out how to get people to willingly pay for a better experience. Socialism wants me to believe the people leaving paper towels on the floor will suddenly become responsible stewards of everyone else’s resources. I’m going with the beaver.

🚨 JUST IN: Katie Miller just QUIT her job at SpaceX and SOLD her shares so her husband, new White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, can work on AI, space, and more without restrictions — The Atlantic PATRIOT. Public service! 🇺🇸 The White House says Stephen is no longer recused from AI, space, and Paramount issues. Katie also exited her Paramount contract over the weekend Stephen had stepped back from those issues because of Katie's work and stock tied to Elon Musk's xAI, which merged into SpaceX Now there's nothing left for the media to complain about! Other than how EFFECTIVE Stephen is 😅 Katie gave up a big payday so Stephen can go all in on President Trump's agenda. THAT is a power couple putting America First 🇺🇸 @KatieMiller @StephenM

That’s hilarious!! 😂😂😂😂

Imagine losing the Senate a week ago, getting beat from Kansas to Texas, and the first thing the man who ran the place does is send word down the line that he does not want Tim Burchett in the seat Marsha Blackburn is leaving… because Tim might not do what leadership tells him to do. There it is. Not that he is unqualified, not that he cannot win, not that he did something wrong… he might not obey. And Tim's answer is the best thing I have heard out of Washington all week. "I love the fact that he's not for me." Then he says the big players in the party, the one or two who pull the strings and write the big checks, have never been for him and are always for him the day after the election. Read that again, because a sitting congressman just told you out loud how the club actually works. Let me explain why this matters. John Thune just presided over what his own colleagues are calling a "stunning defeat," and Senate Republicans are still lined up to hand him the minority leader job, so much so that Ron Johnson, Rick Scott, Mike Lee, John Kennedy and others had to sign a letter just to ask for a meeting first to talk about what went wrong. How is it that the guy who lost the majority has time to work against a Tennessee appointment but no time to answer for the loss? Who exactly is he protecting that seat from, the Democrats or his own voters? Here is the reality. The uniparty does not fear losing to the left nearly as much as it fears one more person in that chamber who will not take the call. They can live in the minority, they have done it before and the checks still clear. What they cannot live with is someone who reads the bill, says no to the omnibus, and goes home and tells you what happened in the room. Now keep in mind, Tim says this came from an off the record conversation with a prominent media figure, and none of it has been confirmed by Thune. Fine. Then Thune can clear it up in public, today, in one sentence. I will wait. The good news is Governor elect Blackburn already said Washington does not decide who the senator from Tennessee is, she does, and she is exactly right. Tim says he is running in 2028 either way. @MarshaBlackburn, the people of Tennessee are watching who you listen to. Appoint the man the swamp does not want. End stop.

Every Republican legislature in America should immediately pass legislation to: 1) Ban sanctuary cities 2) Ban Ranked Choice Voting 3) Ban ballot harvesting 4) Require citizenship to vote 5) Require photo ID to vote 6) Ban the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact 7) Ban foreign entities from buying property 8) Suspend any gas taxes 9) Institute school choice 10) Abolish property taxes 11) Open non-juror records to public inspection 12) Mandate secretaries of state to share complete voter registration rolls with DOJ 13) Mandate voter roll list maintenance 14) Offer rewards for convictions involving fraudulent use of Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, Social Security, or other entitlements Republican governors would be wise to use this time to convene special sessions.

“Ever since that guy Charlie Kirk got murdered, and I shouldn’t say this publicly but…. I feel better.” - Dave Chappelle

I cant breathe 😭

It feels like removing a dagger from my leg. Headache. Dysphoria. Flatness. Hearing phantom iPhone dings in my sleep. Days 1-3 were more of a rush. I felt light and free. On day 4, the withdrawals began. I've never had to kick something like this before. Screens are a legit addiction. I'm curious to see if the month 6 PET scan shows enhanced metabolism in regions that improve in drug addicts who quit like the thalamus, frontal cortex, and striatum (reward circuit). There are no PET studies of people quitting screens, so Dr. Eber and I are breaking new ground. Image attached is baseline PET (F18 tracer). That's one of a few scans I'm tracking. Day 6/365 Sent from my screenless phone

از دست شماها مردم از خنده 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 پلیس فقط مونده این چیه

Miller terrifying. It’s not rhetoric. It’s administrative suffocation. In his first term, Miller learned that you don’t need Congress to destroy an enemy program. You just need to redefine the terms. Look at what he did with the "Public Charge" rule. He didn’t pass a law saying "no immigrants." He changed the definition of who constitutes a burden on the state. Suddenly, if you used food stamps, you were inadmissible. The legal challenge took years. By the time the courts sorted it out, the policy had already chilled millions of applications. The bureaucracy itself became the border wall. Now? He’s got Russ Vought at OMB. Do you understand the synergy here? It’s lethal. Miller writes the executive order that redefines "national security threat" to include any NGO that receives foreign funding (looking at you, Open Society Foundations). Vought then zeroes out the budget for any agency that refuses to enforce that definition. It’s a pincer movement. Miller provides the legal cover; Vought provides the financial starvation. The Democrats are screaming about "rule of law." Miller is laughing. He is the rule of law. He just reads it differently. He reads it as a weapon, not a shield. Miller understands that the modern globalist project relies on labor arbitrage. They import cheap labor to suppress wages, which keeps inflation low enough to service the massive debt bubble, which keeps the stock market high, which keeps the donors happy. It’s a closed loop. Miller’s goal? Break the loop. By shutting down illegal immigration and slashing legal H-1B visas, he forces companies to pay American wages. This causes short-term inflation. The Fed panics. The stock market dips. The NYT writes op-eds about "economic disaster." Miller doesn’t care. Why? Because he knows that Judy Shelton and the Treasury team are preparing a monetary reset (the Gold/ESF play we discussed). They want the dollar to weaken slightly against hard assets. They want the stock market to correct so they can buy back equity at lower prices for the sovereign wealth funds. Miller is the wrecking ball that clears the site for the new construction. The Democrats are terrified because they see the wrecking ball and think it’s destruction. Miller knows it’s renovation. The Left fights with morality. They say, "This is wrong." "This is cruel." "This is un-American." Miller fights with mechanics. He says, "This is statutory." "This is regulatory." "This is funded." You cannot argue morality against a spreadsheet. You cannot shame a regulation. You cannot protest a budget line item. When Miller issues an order to deport every non-citizen with a final removal order, the Left will scream "Racist!" Miller will respond with, "Section 235(b)(1) of the INA mandates expedited removal for individuals who cannot prove credible fear. We are enforcing the law." That’s what scares them. He’s not breaking the law. He’s using their own laws against them. He’s using the Administrative Procedure Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Posse Comitatus Act (reinterpreted via Insurrection Act precedents) he’s using the entire weight of the federal code to crush their ideological preferences. They can’t call him a fascist because he’s quoting statutes. They can’t call him a dictator because he’s following procedure. They can’t call him evil because he’s efficient. Click Patreon Link In Bio/Profile (For More Insight)

Stand. Fight. Defend the Republic.

Father Coughlin built one of the most powerful antisemetic movements in America in the 1930s. He started innocently enough, just by giving his economic arguments spiritual authority. Then his radio show allowed him to bypass the normal checks and balances that exist inside institutional intermediaries. He was able to speak to his audiences directly. The mass media distribution was a powerful catalyst. What did he even say that was so dangerous. All he did was attack financial elites, monetary policy, and economic arrangements he presented as hostile to ordinary Americans. He initially supported Franklin Roosevelt, then turned against him and organized political opposition through the National Union for Social Justice and the Union Party because he believed that Roosevelt was controlled by Jews and that’s why he forced America to get into WW2. His broadcasts became more and more radicalized and his newspaper became increasingly divided and public life was split in between righteous and corrupt camps, eventually incorporating explicit antisemitic conspiracy theories. His political movement helped create the environment in which the Christian Front emerged in the late 1930s. Coughlin taught his audience that political disagrees is actually spiritual conflict. Satan becomes Jews, secular politics, necons, Freemasons… and religious identity was a test. Friend or enemy. Coughlin was reaching approximately 30 million radio listeners in a country of roughly 122 million people. His audience gave him extraordinary influence over American politics. Does this sound familiar?

Peltolagate BOMBSHELL REVELATIONS in the Alaska Election Campaign Fraud scandal. Part 2. The operative coordinating the Alaska election voter fraud scheme has been identified as Thomas Datwyler, a nefarious and corrupt campaign election operative who has previously been named as a respondent in 24 complaints before the FEC. Two of the complaints ended in significant penalties. Datwyler's firm’s website claims he has directed more than 400 political committees and filed over 4,000 FEC reports since launching 9Seven Consulting in 2013. Datwyler serves as the board treasurer for the American Center for Counter Extremism. The ACCE is a non-partisan and not-for-profit policy, research, and advocacy group committed to advancing innovative public policy strategies in the fight against extremism, terrorism, and the protection of foundational democratic values including freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Datwyler’s professional record is a matter of public record. Across the past three years, his work as treasurer has triggered formal action in five states – civil penalties, criminal investigations, federal regulatory inquiries, and a U.S. Department of Justice complaint. Datwyler's Alabama Values PAC smeared five Alabama Republican incumbents. In July 2024, a Republican PAC tied to U.S. Senate candidate Jim Marchant filed a U.S. Department of Justice complaint accusing Datwyler of wire fraud. In 2024, Tennessee election authorities referred a complaint involving a Datwyler-tied PAC to the state attorney general’s office. In August 2023, Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch publicly opened an investigation into Datwyler for potential criminal violations of state election law. The complaint alleged he had used a PAC structure to route approximately $885,000 in out-of-state money around Mississippi’s contribution limits In March 2024, U.S. Senator Mike Braun’s (R-Indiana) Senate campaign paid a $159,000 Federal Election Commission civil penalty to settle campaign-finance allegations. Datwyler was the campaign’s treasurer at settlement. Right for Alaska, which appears to be based in Wisconsin, is promoting “Decoy Dan” on its website after spending six figures backing candidates Republicans have accused of being spoilers. Since late July, the shadowy super PAC has spent over $2.3 million on alternative Republican Senate contenders, including just shy of $1.15 million outright opposing Senator Dan S. Sullivan, according to disclosures with the Federal Election Commission. This includes efforts to prop up Gerald Heikes to the tune of over $700,000 and Earl “Skip” Southworth by north of $500,000 as Republican candidates in Alaska’s Senate primary. Two PACs that have listed Datwyler as their treasurer have spent more than $3.75 million attacking Sen. Daniel S. Sullivan and supporting Heikes since mid-October. They follow the same playbook of a different Datwyler-affiliated PAC that spent more than $2 million in the Alaska Senate primary in August – and which later revealed it was funded in part by a liberal dark-money group. In Ohio, yet another Datwyler-linked PAC dropped more than $3.8 million to attack GOP Senator Jon Husted and support William Redpath, a longshot libertarian candidate on the ballot. This is Part 2 in this investigative series.

Dear @JDVance, You warned on Wednesday that the next few months would bring a lot of gaslighting. Then you wrote the first draft. Your post says any honest conversation must start with the war. Great. Since April you have been the administration’s lead negotiator, which makes you the owner of the track that turned a seven-week bombing campaign into an eight-month stalemate. Every week of ceasefire that was not a peace kept the Strait a question mark and kept diesel where eighty-seven percent of voters said they could feel it. Had you spent the spring arguing for the one hour the President says it would take instead of extending the stalemate, the war would have been over by summer, the pump would have said so, and you would be writing a different post. You promised no forever war. You then built a ceasefire with no exit, and sat on it for seven months. Tell voters what settlement you believed was achievable, what deadlines mattered, and what the administration planned to do if negotiations failed. You say you know a great many of the smartest people in politics, but not one of them has a name. (Tucker?) At least one of them cannot count (also Tucker?), because on your list of four things, items one and two are the same item, and item three is a bumper sticker. Item four is the only entry that names a country, and it is not the country we are at war with. (BTW I can guess where item four came from. Days ago @TuckerCarlson wrote that the administration was considering striking Pickaxe Mountain under pressure from Netanyahu, on the strength of Israeli intelligence. That is your fourth item, written out in full. No one had to poll for it. It was posted.) The poll itself. “Change our relationship to Israel” is broad enough to mean several incompatible things. What did those voters actually say? Did they spontaneously mention Israel? Were they offered a list? What percentage selected that answer? Were they objecting to this war, particular Israeli policies, American assistance, or the alliance itself? Why not publish the questionnaire, the sample, the percentages, and the crosstabs. By contrast, the networks published their exit polls. The issues voters were asked about were the economy, democracy, immigration, corruption, the Iran war and artificial intelligence. Israel did not need a column, because voters were not voting about Israel. The sole evidence that the American electorate rendered a verdict on Israel is a phone call between you and a man you will not identify. Contrast your response with @realDonaldTrump’s. Asked about your post, he acknowledged the war’s electoral cost and said he would make the decision again because long term it's the only answer. Agree or disagree, he defended his decision. In July, you yourself said America would have fought this war without Israeli influence. You explained that the president independently opposed an Iranian nuclear weapon—and that you agreed. Now your post finds room for an unnamed pollster’s undefined grievance against Israel, but none for an accounting of your own decisions as the administration’s lead negotiator. Name the pollster. Publish the questions and the results. Tell voters which decisions you supported, which you opposed, and which you would reverse. The President answered for his decision. That is leadership. If you want to be a leader, you need to be able to answer for yours.

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK on Election Eve, 2024: “I have NO IDEA what’ll happen. But whatever happens, we’ll keep fighting.” NEVER, EVER quit 🇺🇸