Wikipedia is the only website in the top-ten most-visited websites to be run by a nonprofit organization. We are not funded by ads. We don’t charge subscription fees. We don’t sell your data. We operate primarily on donations from people like you. Read ➡️ wikimediafoundation.org/news…
7 reasons why you should donate to Wikipedia

ALT 7 reasons why you should donate to Wikipedia

Dec 17, 2024 · 9:35 PM UTC

83
33
10
93
19,825
RelevantRecentLikes
I can think of 107 reasons not to donate to Wiki anymore!
1
10
95
Is this accurate? $51.7 million?
Image from YabaiAnseh Al-Amonda (@al_amonda)
2
16
308
Wikipedia is one of the most corrupt liberal organizations, that removes or refuses to add conservative content & true facts. Ask me how I know‼️@Kash_Patel @PamBondi
1
13
102
Yeah I saw how much money you guys get and how you use it. I’ll never donate again. I’d rather buy a copy of winrar
20
243
10 years or more ago I would have donated but you all have destroyed something that could have been a huge boost to the overall knowledge and growth of mankind. You interject ideology instead of knowledge. People around the world should stop donating, let you die on the vine, and another group without ill intent create what could have been an amazing artifact.
3
1
26
352
never. wokepedia needs to die or change leadership.
1
13
249
You just openly lie to us.
7
50
except the money isn't used to maintain Wikipedia. it's funding all kinds of NGOs dishonestly pretending it's "for Wikipedia"
1
20
241
Један разлог зашто не донирати #Wikipedia: администратори на википедији на српском језику вређају, понижавају, омоловажавају и дискриминишу уреднике који су се јавно декларисали као небинарне особе. Ево #Dungodung уредника назива КРАВОМ КОЈА ДАЈЕ МЛЕКО, АЛИ ЈЕ НОГОМ ПРОСУЛА КОФУ
Филип Маљковић, dungodung

ALT Филип Маљковић, dungodung

2
2
210
If teachers tell their students not to use your site as a source, you have a major problem
4
45
Big govt shills
5
37
The only thing I use Wikipedia for is pop culture references. It's way too biased for anything important.
12
191
Tick Tock
2
40
You are garbage and you are done.
4
50
And… We allow anyone, anywhere to add, subtract data regardless of the facts being truthful. Articles are generally a personal perspective.
1
33
@Wikimedia
Image from Chillies (@DrChillies)
4
127
Apparently, your censorship of populist voices is bout to backfire 💥
1
27
Sunlight is the best disinfectant
4
34
And you are not factual.
3
34
When you stop wasting money on political indoctrination, I will gladly donate again: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/libsoftiktok/status/18…
Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) profile pictureLibs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok23 Dec 2024
Wikipedia’s annual budget report from 2023—2024 reveals that they spent over $50 million of their total $177 million budget on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Stop donating to Wokepedia
Image from Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok)
8
217
Sadly you a Woke and you spread the worst misinformation. Not getting a dime from me.
1
10
203
This is why Wiki will NEVER get a penny from me, my family and 90% of my friends.
Image from Ron Dorriety (@RDorriety)
1
20
You are a Qatari based propaganda network.
Image from Emilio Rey (@EmilioRey1)
1
17
I can't donate. You allow misinformation on your site. Example: RFK Jr has the following written about him (I just grabbed some of the false data...yeah, there's more)
Image from RMB (@RMB90832847)
2
15
167
Hopefully not for long. You guys are a joke and should not be trusted at all.
1
13
youtube.com/watch?v=Wt1Clbf6…
1
22
For budget of 179184 EUR in 2025 fiscal year: Ratko Mladic on Main Page! 💻 LOOOOOOOOOOOOL 😂😂😂 sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93…

Википедија

sr.wikipedia.org
21
It all starts with one lie. @Wikimedia can no longer be trusted. You are NOT neutral. And no, not everyone can edit it. You've conveniently locked Tommy's page. Imagine if Assange had to deal with your bullshit on top of everything else. Disgraceful! xitter.twitterapi.xyz/TRobinsonNewEra/status…
22
.....it's also the most biased, fake info pushing, radical leftist outlets on the web.
21
Why would anyone donate to a corrupt leftist propaganda publication?
2
26
Not one cent. 🖕
1
12
185
It is incorrect that your are in the top 10 most visited sight.
1
31
money, money, money 🎶 xitter.twitterapi.xyz/BenamiCentral/status/1…
✨Бенами✨ (@BenamiCentral) profile picture✨Бенами✨
@BenamiCentral26 Dec 2024
#Wikipedia: ја тек сада видим да је википедији на српском језику одобрено 179.184 EUR за фискалну 2025. годину а тамо има око 20 аутора који месечно начине преко 100 и више измена и објаве око 6.000 нових чланака годишње, па врисак! 😂 meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gran…

Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/General Support Fund/Annual plan of Wikimedia Serbia...

meta.wikimedia.org
30
On sr.wiki: account under username Боки at the bottom of his user page, translated into english, wrote: This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of service, discloses that he is paid by Brisk Web for contributions to Wikipedia's member(s). WHOIS Domain Lookup does not provide information about this site, but Company Wall business claims that the owner of the company Brisk Web Services is Bojan Cvjetković. Also, in his biography on Wikipedia, under the external links section, you can read that his company's website is Brisk Web Services. In this way, it turns out that Bojan Cvjetković, through his company Brisk Web, pays himself (Боки) to edit Wikipedia. He is essentially self-promoting. According to all policies, rules, and guidelines applicable to Wikipedia: self-promotion is strictly prohibited.
14
As a centrist, I used to donate, now I do not. You need major reform and most likely a complete dumping of your steering committee. I do not donate to ideologically captured organizations. Wikipedia was a great idea. Leftists ruined.
5
80
Bl00dy Leftist jihadi Ah0le Wikipedia! FO bstds!!
1
12
Load more replies