Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness) header
Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness) profile picture
Joined October 2022
Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)Photo by Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness)
Mandelbrot retweeted
The Bessent Bond Volatility Playbook 1. Trump does something stupid— volatility marks a swing high 2. Trump continues doing stupid things— pressure builds with successive higher lows 3. Trump ratchets up the stupidity— SFP the swing high 4. Taco— One Year Prosperity Channel
Red Lining… All part of the process… Have a good one.
5
8
4
97
22,346
Pls Buy
Replying to @Wild_Randomness
I will leave it to Gavin Baker to stroke himself off about each incremental 5B of ARR 80-100B is no joke, but I think it’s a sweet spot My paranoia is telling me ANT is doing everything they can to fire on all cylinders into IPO and as more shares unlock it’s going to be coincidentally harder to get that incremental 5B as these numbers get larger and larger
1
2
2
34
6,094
Solely observing the chart… NQ looks polar opposite to Sept FOMC set-up to me Yeah positioning of smart people (HFs) is giga low, but maybe they’re just… smart? tbd
Replying to @Wild_Randomness
$SPY Like I’ve been saying, feels like a different set-up into a rather sanguine FOMC. We had a lot of fear and strong selling during the previous two events that precipitated massive swing longs (see quote); today somewhat of a complacent grind up. My base case is we just have more chop and premium burn in store, but to me, if you’re a degenerate gambler, the tail scenario is we see similar action to the week leading up to the 2022 mid-terms (pictured) given how we’ve traded opposite to prior lead-ups into Warsh. Don’t think you need to commit a ton of premium to the idea, these types of trades will usually miss, but the payoffs can be huge when they do hit, so I don’t mind playing for some asymmetry. My gamble: “This is what I’m currently watching for. We had a -5% 3-day drawdown right before the last mid terms (2022). Will be trying Monday OTM puts on any spike up into and through FOMC. Just in case we are getting the exact opposite PA from the prior two FOMCs (swing low as opposed to swing high)”
1
1
1
41
17,212
Mandelbrot retweeted
We did hit that low overnight, doesn’t show on cash session, so still tracking very well Now let’s get a clearing event pop shall we?
2
1
16
3,024
Mandelbrot retweeted
Maybe you get 420-440, maybe you don’t
1
18
2,394
$BTC Out at 60.8 as per the quoted tweet. Bitfinex twap beginning to slow down? Hmmm
1
1
47
30,377
Mandelbrot retweeted
$ANSEM Lose this level and its lights out
No worries, funds are just selling to make room for LAPTOP in their KOL basket
6
1
1
83
24,754
Alright filled on what I wanted Prob goes higher today as he sounds pretty dovish imo, but like most fomc’s, real move will appear tomorrow Could be continuation ofc
3
1
22
4,026
After staying in the private markets until their Series W, they are finally rushing to Democratize Finance and ensure everyone gets a slice
Anthropic's lockup is insane What are we doing here
1
1
2
50
9,232
$QQQ Not like I’m anywhere near max long but the more whining about how every single scenario tomorrow financial assets die, the more some semblance of this is a real possibility… During the prior two HTF “rollovers” anyone who was paying attention knew the end was near, and yet both instances the Qs went on to test ATHs (+5% in a very short period). Just something to keep in mind, nothing is outside of the realm of possibilities, and it’s times like these when the outcome seems preordained you should be considering the exact opposite scenario playing out. Not here to tell you why or how, just talking price action. Topping is a process (if that’s what we’re in fact doing). I’d just say if we trade down tomorrow into the guaranteed rate hike and we knee-jerk down, pay special attention for any strength from there— it may be our best long opportunity since…. the last FOMC…
Check price Same price Every day
4
2
1
69
87,006
Is it too much to ask for HYPE to increase from 0.9% of TOTAL crypto market to 1.3%?
4
4
1
96
6,669
$SPY Like I’ve been saying, feels like a different set-up into a rather sanguine FOMC. We had a lot of fear and strong selling during the previous two events that precipitated massive swing longs (see quote); today somewhat of a complacent grind up. My base case is we just have more chop and premium burn in store, but to me, if you’re a degenerate gambler, the tail scenario is we see similar action to the week leading up to the 2022 mid-terms (pictured) given how we’ve traded opposite to prior lead-ups into Warsh. Don’t think you need to commit a ton of premium to the idea, these types of trades will usually miss, but the payoffs can be huge when they do hit, so I don’t mind playing for some asymmetry. My gamble: “This is what I’m currently watching for. We had a -5% 3-day drawdown right before the last mid terms (2022). Will be trying Monday OTM puts on any spike up into and through FOMC. Just in case we are getting the exact opposite PA from the prior two FOMCs (swing low as opposed to swing high)”
$QQQ Not like I’m anywhere near max long but the more whining about how every single scenario tomorrow financial assets die, the more some semblance of this is a real possibility… During the prior two HTF “rollovers” anyone who was paying attention knew the end was near, and yet both instances the Qs went on to test ATHs (+5% in a very short period). Just something to keep in mind, nothing is outside of the realm of possibilities, and it’s times like these when the outcome seems preordained you should be considering the exact opposite scenario playing out. Not here to tell you why or how, just talking price action. Topping is a process (if that’s what we’re in fact doing). I’d just say if we trade down tomorrow into the guaranteed rate hike and we knee-jerk down, pay special attention for any strength from there— it may be our best long opportunity since…. the last FOMC…
3
2
1
30
16,839
$XLU Dec 2027 calls Nibble on red days into the 200 week Nervous about it below box / 200w
1
2
1
27
14,904
Every cringe character rushing to bet Jason a ticket Just don’t say I didn’t warn you (Will not delete if wrong)
Grant Cardone bets Jason Calacanis $1 million that bitcoin will surpass the all time high in 2 years.
1
14
2,287
$ZEC Magic…
11
2
2
144
21,886
Crazy that we are now at a point that we are depending on *Amazon* to save the AI trade
1
19
2,268
Santa rally… from $50
2
1
2
19
6,609
$HYPE Didn’t get the swipe yet, but the timing is here Re-bought some with room to add into 74 Green close and that’ll lock in a daily bull div Arthur (and Flowhorse) says Hype is destined to underperform from here, but I’m not willing to join that bet here at weekly trend.
$HYPE Yeah yeah downside outperformance doesn’t pay the bills (unless you’re running the pair trade ofc) When do we make money on the long side? Current fractal I’m watching…
5
2
1
149
16,242
Aaand there goes 60% of that inflow…
2
1
44
5,298
I know fintwit idolizes him, but I’m starting to think dude is a little too full of himself “I am the house” … *10yr blows up 70 bps over the next month* Now these comments… ego issues to work through? Fine if he could back it up Textbook halo effect from working with Druck
FT: Treasury secretary Scott Bessent told investors in a private meeting that he did not see a “systemic problem” with the AI boom, downplaying concerns that the industry is in a bubble like the one that preceded the dotcom bust. “I’m good at figuring out when there are problems in systems,” Bessent, said when asked about AI in an interview with Bridgewater chief executive Nir Bar Dea, according to three people who were present at the event. “I don’t see a systemic problem.”
5
1
36
6,528