ZKittyC

People who claim to be on our side, who want to stop talking about this ( which is impossible), aren't really on our side.

Food stamp advocate SELF-DESTRUCTS as Rep. Brandon Gill presses her on why taxpayers pay for Coca-Cola. She tries to dodge the question. Then Gill pulls out the receipts, and she sits there in stunned silence. GILL: “Should SNAP dollars be spent on sodas?” WITNESS: “I am happy to talk about hunger and nutrition, but not dictate what Americans should or should not eat or may have access to.” GILL: “I’m asking if tax dollars should be used to pay for sodas.” “Do they need sugary sodas to survive?” WITNESS: “Some of them do…” GILL: “You think they need Coca-Cola to survive?” “I’m giving you the opportunity to say yes or no.” WITNESS: “I will not answer for individuals and their… choices.” GILL: “What does SNAP stand for?” WITNESS: “It’s a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.” GILL: “What’s nutritional about Coca-Cola?” WITNESS: “I am not a nutritionist.” Then Gill asks who’s paying her, and she freezes like a deer in headlights. GILL: “Is your organization funded by organizations that make money from food stamps?” [awkward silence] GILL: “Do organizations who profit off of food stamps fund your organization or businesses?” WITNESS: “I mean, in the, in the, I, I can’t comment to that.” GILL: “Does General Mills fund your organization?” WITNESS: “I don’t have access to that information.” GILL: “I do. It’s right here. They do fund your organization. […] Yes, and they’re profiting off of your advocacy. Do you think that that’s a conflict of interest?” [more silence] GILL: “I think most people think that’s a conflict of interest. I know you don’t want to answer.” Always follow the money. CONTEXT: USDA’s own study found soft drinks were the #1 purchase in SNAP households, beating milk, ground beef, and everything else in the store.

Woman who served as a poll watcher in NYC says the voting process was “sketchy.” She began observing the audit after the election, but says election officials were extremely uncooperative and refused to let her verify whether the seals on the ballot bags at the audit location matched those used at the original polling station. “The first thing they did was deny our certificate, which is a perfectly legal certificate for observation. But they had two attorneys there to fight with us and argue that our certificate was not valid. Then we had to spend an hour looking around. We got another certificate from a different political party, and they finally let us into the audit. But by that time, they had already opened all of the early voting ballot bags, so we didn’t have an opportunity to check whether the ballot bags arrived at the audit with their seals intact. Then we asked to see the log from the polling location, which would show whether the seals on the bags were the correct seals or whether, for some reason, those seals had been switched out. But they absolutely refused to show us the seal log. In fact, the deputy chief clerk had a bit of a meltdown when we asked for it. The log showing that the seals are the same ones that were on the ballot bags at the polling location is really the single most important document in the audit. The fact that they’re not willing to show it to us speaks volumes. It essentially means their process is meaningless because they should be checking that the seals are the same ones that left the polling location. Our presence is just an added layer of protection, with poll watchers checking the process. But the Board itself is supposed to be making that very important comparison, and obviously, they’re not. So we’re going to be back in court with them.” New York law specifically authorizes poll watchers to observe the unlocking, examination, and resealing of voting machines and ballot boxes. While this woman appears to be following the law, the election officials seem to be doing everything they can to obstruct her. If they have nothing to hide, why are they being so uncooperative?

Tick Tock. Tick Tock. Unconfirmed reports are circulating that even Democrats are expressing private concerns — in texts, emails, and notes — that they do not believe the results. There are also allegations that people inside the syndicate itself are worried the fraudulent totals went too far. That the numbers no longer match the people who exist, and that the scale is no longer something they can quietly manage. If those reports hold, it means the same people who administered the architecture, collected the paper, and treated the documents as optional are now privately acknowledging what citizens have been saying out loud: the totals do not reconcile. The instruments are already written. The Director of National Intelligence must deliver the assessment under Executive Order 13848 no later than December 18, 2026. The Department of War has the final say. Federal databases by county already exist that can surface what the paper hid. The math does not care who is nervous. The math is not optional. Tick Tock. Tick Tock. parrish4mn.com/2026/11/minne… — Phillip C. Parrish Intelligence Cell | Operation Shadow Hunt

מורה נבוכים: אין אף איש שמאל, מקטן ועד גדול, מזוטר ועד בכיר, שהידהד או עסק בדרך כלשהי בחשיפה הדרמטית של עמית סגל אתמול בערוץ 12. הקלטות של ניצב בועז בלט, ראש אגף חקירות ומודיעין, שלא נחשד באהדה יתרה לממשלה הנוכחית, כלומר, לא מדובר באמירות שיכולות להיחשב כפוזיציה. בהקלטות שמעידות ממקור ראשון - ומאחת האינסטנציות הכי בכירות במערכת - אנחנו מקבלים אישוש למה שידוע כבר שנים: הפרקליטות של מדינת ישראל, הגוף שהיה אמור להיות מקדש החוק והצדק היא ארגון פשע שעובד לפי סטנדרטים של חיסולי חשבונות והתנקשויות פוליטיות, לא באמצעות אקדח אבל באמצעים יעילים לא פחות. עכשיו השאלה הרטורית המתבקשת היא למה אין אף אדם בשמאל שמוטרד מזה? והתשובה היא פשוטה: כמו ה״דמוקרטיה״, כמו ה״חטופים״, כמו ה״השתמטות״, כמו ה״שחיתות״, לשמאל אין שום ענין בנושא ערכי לשם התוכן הערכי שבו, אלא לשם השימוש האינסטרומנטלי שניתן לעשות בו כדי לשרת את השגת הכוח הפוליטי שהוא תכלית הכל. הנושאים ה״ערכיים״ של השמאל הם הנשא שעליו מסונתז הרעל, הארס, שמוחדר לתוך גוף החברה במטרה לפורר אותה מבפנים, להחליש אותה, להתיש אותה, עד שתהיה מוכנה להשתלטות ובניה מחדש. המוסר בתפיסה השמאלנית הוא מה שמשרת את השגת הכוח הפוליטי ושימורו. מעשה אנטי-מוסרי הוא מעשה שפוגע בהשגת הכוח הפוליטי או בשימורו. זה אותו עיקרון שלפיו פועל מלנשון בצרפת, ולפיו פועלים כיום הקצוות הרדיקלים של המפלגה הדמוקרטית בארה״ב (אם כי עדיין בהיקפים מצומצמים ביחס למתרחש באירופה), ולפיו פעלה ברית המועצות, סין הקומוניסטית וכל שאר שכיות החמדה של השמאל. בתפיסה הזו מה שבעינינו נתפס כארגון פשע, נתפס בעיניהם ככלי חשוב במשולש השליטה שמורכב מהפרקליטות, הייעוץ המשפטי ובית המשפט העליון. כל אחד מהם, בהיותו איבר חשוב במערך השגת הכוח הפוליטי ושימורו, הוא גוף מוסרי וחשוב בהצלת ה״דמוקרטיה״, כלומר הצלה ושימור הכוח הפוליטי של השמאל.