Adam Kovacevich (@adamkovac) header
Adam Kovacevich (@adamkovac) profile picture

Founder and CEO, @progresschamber. Democrat. Tech optimist. Ex @googlepubpolicy @limebike. Working to help Dems win again.

Washington, DC
Joined February 2009
Adam Kovacevich retweeted
A drunk driver crashed into Sarah McCammon and her son. Now she feels safer in a driverless car than in a car with a human driver, and she wants DC to stop waiting. Add your name at dc4avs.com
4
7
486
More Gen X erasure. Sadly we're used to it. And because we're Gen X we don't complain about it.
According to the data, Gen X is the biggest loser generation of all time, via @andrewvandam
366
Ya love to see it
The centrist Blue Dog Coalition is taking a class photo with its new members:
1
8
890
Adam Kovacevich retweeted
Wow. DC's updated AV bill would also give rideshare drivers and AV facility workers the right to organize. Labor would be crazy to not take this deal.
NEWS: A bill to legalize Waymo and other self-driving cars in D.C. is on the legislative rocks, and a key architect is offering some last-minute hail-Mary changes to mollify labor unions in hopes of saving it this year. washingtonsun.com/metro/dc/d…
6
4
28
2,323
Good chat with @WOLF_Financial talking about Democrats, tech, data centers, AI and the election
1
2
352
Adam Kovacevich retweeted
DC's greatest policy weakness is legislative amnesia. I've been observing DC's work on autonomous vehicle policy for over a decade. Here's what I'm afraid will happen if DC Council kicks the can down the road again. Q4 2026: Folks will keep repeating that things are moving too fast, even though DC passed one of America's first AV laws in 2012. Even though @charlesallen wrote a rigorous, thoughtful, best-in-the-nation AV bill. They'll earnestly promise that a new bill will be written at the beginning of the next session. Q1 2027: The new AV bill will not arrive. It is not JLG's priority. There will be no timeline. There will be few meetings. There will be no negotiation. She's entering office facing a budget crisis, a time crunch on Gold Line + transporting people to RFK, and her first-year priorities. Q2 2027: Certain interest groups will work on convincing certain Council members to re-adopt the "report brain" approach to AV policy that defined the last decade (h/t @KelseyTuoc). Q3 2027: Council will hold yet another hearing. It will be several hours long. It will immediately be forgotten. And let me just remind y'all: the hearing in July was 8+ hours. Allen chaired through the whole thing and JLG showed up with opening remarks, but other committee members hardly engaged. This is not a rushed process. I have seen rushed processes. DC isn't capable of those. Q4 2027: When markup is about to be scheduled, labor interests and the entity that pays for the scary ads will roll out the same exact talking points about "rushing." Council will decide to write yet another bill asking DDOT to spend millions of dollars on a taxpayer-funded consultant report that will never arrive. 2028-2030: Same story, repeated over and over, in DC Council. Most other major cities in America will have AVs, while Vision Zero continues to fail in DC and countless residents continue to be left at the curb by the inequitable and inaccessible status quo. I hope to be proven wrong.
I support authorizing autonomous vehicles in DC. Before we vote, let’s take a few more months to work with the incoming mayor, who will implement the law, and address the concerns raised by firefighters, for-hire vehicle workers, and others. We’ll have a stronger bill for it.
5
10
1
91
4,778
My current sense of the debate among Democrats on legislating vs. oversight - and where to focus each.
2
631
The AI safety battles aren't David v. Goliath. They're Goliath v. Goliath.
A final scorecard for the two big AI super PACs: Public First spent ~$63 million boosting 17 candidates. Ten are coming to Congress. Leading the Future spent ~$54m on 48 candidates. 41 - most in safe seats - were elected. AI safety won the day. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
5
525
Cosign
Replying to @JoshuaBarzon
I think we can all agree that most of America's problems stem from the fact that Gen X is not a high enough percentage of the population. If we were like 40% (or at least the only ones allowed to vote) almost all our problems would be solved.
3
620
Ways to poll voters about issue prioritization, from worst to best: - How important is issue X to your vote? - Pick most impt issue from a short list - Pick most impt from a long list - Open-ended @SearchlightInst did it the best way. And AI / data centers was a blip
9
12
7
42
83,740
One thing to watch: if Warren starts using her Banking chair to try to do corporate oversight beyond the financial sector, do other Senate chairs defend their turf?
1
5
843
Ya love to see it
Thrilled to welcome our LARGEST freshman class of New Dems EVER! Let’s get to work!
1
8
1,412
Adam Kovacevich retweeted
“Data centers are taking all our water” is the “immigrants are eating all our pets” of the left
60
531
25
6,177
114,092
Not sure I buy the “end of the Trump era” takes, for one reason: Democrats will make 2028 about moving on from the Trump era, and even though he won’t be on the ballot, he will absolutely want to make 2028 a referendum on him too.
1
3
883
This is really important. If the new Dem trifectas operate like MN/Walz did in 2022-23, they'll overshoot and lose their trifecta. If Dems want trifectas to last, they should mimic what Spanberger is doing in VA: steering the trifecta toward her brand of moderation.
Relevant to the "replace Jeffries and Schumer" convo - I wrote this week about how the Dem govs who just won trifectas are not going the Walz route. IE, not taking every progressive bill off the shelf to pass it. Shapiro, before the election, emphasized that he needed a senate majority to raise the min wage, pass housing reform... basically 80-20 issues. But progressives are arguing that their agenda items fit into the Affordability (tm) agenda too semafor.com/article/11/06/20…
1
1
609
I've seen a few of the "Data Center Election!" people say that voters' focus on cost of living tacitly includes data centers. @TahraHoops broke down what Dems' cost of living ads actually mentioned. Only 9% of the cost ads mentioned data centers.
3
1
3
1,941
I must have missed all the Dem candidates who won by railing against Amazon for having too-low prices
3
1
1
57
3,289
The [My Pet Monocause] Election
2
5
716