Lol imagine thinking you're gonna get a Chinese spy girlfriend and you get this instead.
I'd never recover.
Fun fact: The woman pictured here credited the viral success of her campaign to the Party for Socialism and Liberation, a China proxy organization operating here in the United States.
PSL is the political arm of the Shanghai-based Neville Roy Singham, an avowed Marxist multimillionaire who has bankrolled anti-American, pro-CCP nonprofits to the tune of $278 million.
Singhamโs political foot soldiers have been boots on the ground in dozens of anti-data center fights across the country. But striking down the $5 billion data center campus in Landover, MD, was by far their biggest scalp.
In the ongoing campaign against American AI, cui bono?
More than anyone, itโs our chief political adversary.
5
318
Tried to slightly improve my Orchestra sounds and accidentally created the Matrix
Full physically/acoustically simulated orchestra, down to the fingers, lips, keys and reeds. Each performer has their own emotional narrative driving their performance under the direction of a conductor.
They can (and do) make mistakes, and each performance is totally unique.
Orchestra and score created in Livemind on Fable 5.2
Thanks Grok. I'll put that four hours into shitposting on X via starlink in my cybertruck instead
1
12
607
Fascism.
Fasces.
A bundle of sticks bound together to create strength. It's inherently collectivist at its core.
Understand that Mussolini was a Marxist scholar and you will understand what fascism is.
---
At 18 he arrived in Switzerland penniless, with only a medallion of Karl Marx in his pocket.
In 1908 he called Marx "the greatest of all theorists of socialism."
He was jailed for strikes and anti-war agitation and reached the Socialist Party's national executive before turning 30.
He edited Avanti!, the party's official paper. Historian Denis Mack Smith says he gave it a radical Marxist edge and doubled its circulation.
When the party expelled him, he said they couldn't take away his "socialist faith." He subtitled his new paper "A Socialist Daily."
He was THE quintessential socialist. The exact guy arguing with you on X dot com today, preaching for socialism, and the murder of political enemies and the siezure of private enterprises.
The doctrine he wrote follows the same line. The Doctrine of Fascism (1932) calls itself "anti-individualistic." It says that for the fascist, everything is contained in the State, and nothing human or spiritual has value outside it. It predicts that the 20th century will be "the century of 'collectivism.'"
Berkeley political scientist A. James Gregor, one of the leading scholars of fascism, concluded that Italian Fascism was "a variant of classical Marxism."
Later, Hitler stated that "The entirety (of National Socialism) was based on Marx. 18 points of his 25 point plan were socialist in nature with the rest nationalist.
Hitler promised socialism, was put into power by socialists for socialist ends. And yes like all forms of socialism it very rapidly devolved into outright dictatorship.
Fascism is blade in the fasces. It's the collective giving collective power to the dictator.
If you don't want fascism, you do not put socialists in power. You do not believe their lies.
๐ค Made with AI
Replying to @House0fstrange
This you?
Replying to @astralmatrix @CommanthaBiden @PayNoTack @Ken67547214 @extremelyrealfr @a_musingcat @amruthapotnuru @alexandr_wang
Me reading this thread
3
35
You'd easily replace politicians with a DAO.
How you do it is this:
Each politician running on the DAO would run in their electorate on their own conscience, essentially as an independent.
If elected, every issue or bill is placed on the ledger. Anyone in the electorate can "cross the floor" on this issue and sway which way the representative votes on a given issue.
In time the representative's own will is decreasingly relevant. Direct democracy itself is unstable and non-voluntaristic.
A hybrid model where you only cross the floor if the issue is important enough builds referendum level representation into the core of the democratic process.
This is effectively a two layered neural network running on existing democratic infrastructure.
In time you can add layers, remove the bias of the individual, improve backpropagation and increase the surface area of contact to the mandate.
Several of these individuals running within the same branch of government can operate with more dynamic electoral districting, more neural layers etc, and more granular decision making. It would scale from the local level to the national or international level.
In time this becomes the predominant "party". At which point many of the other barriers and neural imperfections can be optimised away.
Democracy is a neural network. A very poor, very course and very corruptible one.
You can build a real neural network on the existing democratic infrastructure, piece by piece, and reach consensus at a granular level rather than through winner-takes-all populism.
It will happen.
Civilisational apoptosis.
If you change the demographics of a nation enough, without cultural integration, you eventually create attractor basins and runaway feedback loops.
This is how cells die.
Scott Galloway calls Elon Musk a "traitor to the West" and invokes the executions of the Rosenbergs after WW2.
"We lined up the Rosenbergs against a wall. This is a traitor to the West, and he should be held to the same standards as every other traitor in the West."
*Applause*
These people are absolutely unhinged.
POV you're about to learn how to live life to the fullest
Replying to @oculatustestis
People still keep quoting Bourdain like he's some life guru. Bruh when someone kills himself, maybe he wasn't so good at life.































