VC investors have enabled the AI industry to bastardize revenue reporting.
In the 2010s, SaaS companies popularized reporting the metric of Annual Run Rate because it was a reliable measure of long term, contractual revenues into the future. The key is that the revenues are contracted and guaranteed thru the contract life hence why forecasting it forward is appropriate.
VCs have taken this to mean Annualized Run Rate when AI is concerned and where you take transactional/API revenue from the last month (or even last week in some cases) and forecast it forward.
It’s insane that investors have enabled this to happen but it’s happened.
Oct 15, 2026 · 4:00 PM UTC
yeah this is a real problem. taking one strong month of usage, multiplying by 12 and calling it ARR basically hides all the volatility that matters in AI right now.
model share can move violently between releases, so I’d rather see contracted revenue, retention + how much of the run-rate survives 90 days later.
7
589
VCs this week
tech industry measuring Anthropic’s ARR xitter.twitterapi.xyz/BleacherReport/status/…
1
482
From my investor update, earlier in the year:
"As we noted last month, we've tightened our definition of signed ARR to be as truth-seeking as possible: monthly and quarterly recurring deals no longer count as ARR (we now call that "run rate" instead), and ARR is now strictly defined as enterprise revenue that's committed for a full year and renews automatically, with a x-day opt-out period toward the end of that contract year."







































