RogersBush26

🚨 URGENT PLEASE SHARE🚨 Retired ICE Field Office Director Scott Mechlowski is calling out Congress for slipping AMNESTY into a new farm labor bill This needs to go viral ASAP!

Two Republican senators from Arkansas, with Democrats about seven weeks from taking over the Senate, have decided this is the moment to sit on one of President Trump's last appeals court picks… because they wanted somebody else. Let me explain what is going on. Trump nominated U.S. District Judge Lee Rudofsky to the Eighth Circuit, and according to judicial nominations insiders, John Boozman and Tom Cotton are working against him because they preferred Arkansas Supreme Court Justice Cody Hiland for the seat. Nobody, on either side, is questioning Rudofsky's record or his qualifications… they just wanted their guy. When he had his hearing in September, his own home state senators did not even introduce him, which almost never happens, and this week Boozman put out a statement saying he continues to "appreciate Judge Rudofsky's service in the Eastern District of Arkansas." Translation… stay where you are. The Judiciary Committee vote is set for November 17, and if they get their way it never moves. Rob Luther, who worked judicial nominations in the White House Counsel's Office in Trump's first term, says Boozman is standing in the way of the first Trump-majority circuit court. Mike Davis called it an unforgivable sin for Boozman and Cotton. And they are right. You do not get to lose the majority, burn the last weeks you have on a turf fight over who gets the robe, and then go home and tell Arkansas voters you stood with the President. How is this even a thing? The voters just told you they are done with a Senate that does nothing, and the first thing you do with your final weeks of power is protect a favor? Make no mistake, it is not Democrats standing in the way of this nomination, it is Republicans, and they are doing it quietly hoping none of you notice. I have watched this movie for years. The cool kids club takes care of its own and the people who put them there get the bill. @JohnBoozman @SenTomCotton, move the nomination. Seven weeks. Let him through and stop playing games with the bench. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

You’re a fraud too who didn’t even have the courage to call out John Thune by name. Every single Republican senator needs to be primary and replaced. You’re all worthless. Come on say some joke and pretend it’s funny while our country goes down the tubes, you all Talk weakling..

VENEZUELA LIST EXPLODES AS MADURO LINKS 60 US SENATORS TO MULTI MILLION BRIBE ALLEGATIONS By Jonathan Gregory Washington, DC - November 10, 2026 A political firestorm has exploded as the Venezuela List links 60 US Senators to multi million bribes from Maduro's narco terror regime. Hugo El Pollo Carvajal, the former Venezuelan intelligence chief now in US prison after pleading guilty to narco terrorism, is revealing Maduro's full war on America. He describes the use of drugs, gangs like Tren de Aragua, and terrorist alliances with Hezbollah, FARC, ELN and Cuban spies to flood American cities with chaos. He confirms Smartmatic was built for election fraud by Venezuelan spies. The Venezuela List accuses these Senators of taking cartel bribes to sabotage President Trump's anti narco operations and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's strategies. The full list of accused Senators includes prominent names like Chuck Schumer of New York, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Adam Schiff of California, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Mark Kelly of Arizona, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Mark Warner of Virginia, Tim Kaine of Virginia, Patty Murray of Washington and dozens more. These allegations place the entire Uniparty under immediate scrutiny. Trump and Hegseth have launched a fierce counteroffensive destroying Venezuelan fentanyl routes, seizing alleged ill gotten assets, and launching cyber strikes against Smartmatic's network. The documents and the prison statements now stand as the active record. Officials named on the list must answer the claims. The American Republic is fighting back and the records will decide it. @TrumpNews

Ricky Schroeder is right.

David Chess, the Democrat mayor of Stratford, CT, just filed for bankruptcy for his health company, Tapestry Health, after Medicare cut off payments during an investigation into the company's billing. I’m sure there’s no fraud at all, and it’s all totally legit…

How Thomas Massie will forever be remembered.

Millions stand with you. So grateful that you have not backed down or taken a knee to these tactics of intimidation. A grateful nation stands ready to defend you.

Hey Rep Massie. International law prof & retired military lawyer here. I read the articles of impeachment you filed against @SecWar today. And it's clear you don't have a clue what you're talking about. For everyone else, read on for a detailed (though not exhaustive) analysis explaining why the allegations presented in these articles are unconvincing as a matter of law. In case you're not familiar, the Constitution establishes the causes & procedures for impeachment. Very briefly, the House of Representatives has sole power of impeachment (Art. I, Sec. 2) & must adopt articles of impeachment by a simple majority of members present for the vote. If that occurs, the Senate then has sole power to try all impeachments (Art. I, Sec. 3) & a conviction requires an affirmative vote by 2/3 of members present for the vote. Finally, the Constitution also establishes that civil officers (including, in this case, SECWAR) "shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" (Art. II, Sec. 2). The focus for present purposes is on the last provision. That is, Massie must demonstrate in his articles - and a majority of the House must agree - that the allegations involving Sec. Hegseth amount to "other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." That will be the focus of this analysis, since none of the 8 articles so qualify. The critical analysis below addresses each of the 8 articles of impeachment. Because the full document is just over 33 pages long & the current platform is an @X post, this analysis won't necessarily be comprehensive in relation any of the 8 articles. Even so, treatment of each one will be detailed enough to at least hit the most important points. Also, it is worth noting that, as a whole, the 8 articles of impeachment merely rehash many of the same complaints & criticisms that have been directed at SECWAR over the last couple years. This means I have addressed many of the individual criticisms along the way as well. For those articles, I'll give an overview of the critical analysis & provide a link to an earlier post for additional reading. One more point before diving in - some of the articles are fundamentally flawed for the same reasons because they involve the same topics (particularly the first 3). For those, I'll consider them together while also addressing each of the individual accusations as part of the overall analysis of the group. With those introductory points in mind, let's carry on to (briefly) analyze each of the 8 articles of impeachment. (For reference, the full articles of impeachment, as filed, are available here: massie.house.gov/uploadedfil…) - Articles I, II & III. The first 3 out of 8 Articles deal with the so-called "War Powers Resolution" adopted, over Pres Nixon's veto, in 1973. Because the WPR has been unconstitutional from the outset, each of these allegations fails to state a "high Crime or Misdemeanor" for the same reason. Specifically:: Article 1 claims, citing 50 U.S.C. §1541(c): "Secretary Hegseth knowingly executed and implemented unlawful orders to initiate war against a foreign nation notwithstanding the absence of congressional authorization, an attack upon the United States giving rise to the national emergency contemplated by law, or an imminent threat requiring immediate defensive action, thereby substituting unlawful executive action for the constitutional and statutory judgment of Congress." Article 2 claims, citing 50 U.S.C. § 1544(c): "Secretary Hegseth knowingly executed and sustained unlawful orders that treated the Executive Branch as possessing authority to determine when war may be commenced, how long it may be sustained, and whether Congress’ direction to terminate hostilities must be obeyed. By implementing those orders, he effectuated, in practice, the unilateral continuation of military operations against Iran despite Congress’ exclusive constitutional authority to declare war and despite Congress’ formal action directing the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities." Article 3 claims, citing 50 U.S.C. § 1544(b): "Secretary Hegseth continued to direct, authorize, and sustain the use of United States Armed Forces in hostilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran after the expiration of every potentially applicable statutory period." The foundational flaw with each of these allegations is that they're based on "obligations" the executive branch - including SECWAR Hegseth - is not ACTUALLY required to recognize or implement. And that's because the War Powers Resolution was unconstitutional when it was initially adopted in 1973 & it remains unconstitutional - for the same reasons - still today. This is a topic I've addressed fairly comprehensively before, so I won't do so here. The short explanation, though, regarding why the WPR has always been unconstitutional is that it purports to expand Congress's authority to declare war (Art. I, Sec. 8) to include all situations of "hostilities." The problem with THAT is that not all "hostilities" amount to "war." And just because Congress has authority to DECLARE "war" doesn't mean it can prohibit the executive from exercising Art. II, Sec. 2 commander-in-chief authority to order @DeptofWar troops to engage in "hostilities". (for additional reading on this topic, see here: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/BrianCox_RLTW/status/2…) Of course, this isn't JUST my analysis. In fact, every @POTUS since the WPR was adopted in 1973 has determined that resolution is unconstitutional (pic 1), essentially for the reason I outlined above. Likewise, historical practice supports the executive's (and my) assessment. As a separate Congressional Research Service report indicates, "there have been hundreds of instances" since 1798 "when the United States has used its Armed Forces in situations of military conflict or potential conflict or for other than normal peacetime purposes." Of these HUNDREDS of instances, there have ONLY been 11 formal declarations of war, and these "encompassed five separate wars" (pic 2) (pic 3 also shows a sampling of these from 1798 to 1825, only one of which - the War of 1812 - involved a formal declaration of war). So, either ALL of these HUNDREDS of examples of "hostilities" that weren't "authorized" by a formal declaration of war were ALSO illegal, OR the War Powers Resolution of 1973 - which purports to expand Congress's authority to "declare war" to cover ALL "hostilities" as well - is unconstitutional. I don't know about you, but that seems to be fairly adequate evidence indicating that the WPR is, in fact, unconstitutional. And if it IS (which, it is), then it isn't capable of establishing binding obligations with which the executive MUST comply. And if THAT is the case (which, it also is), then Rep Massie's claim that SECWAR Hegseth committed "other Crimes and Misdemeanors" by failing to comply with various (nonexistent) obligations is, in a word, bogus. - Article IV. The basis for the next article is a claim that: "Secretary Hegseth willfully and systemically refused to comply with laws and directives mandated for the protection of civilians during the commission of armed conflict, chilled and rendered ineffective such components to prevent and mitigate harm to civilians, and therefore, foreseeably effected the death and injury of over 200 civilians [referring to the attack reportedly directed against an elementary school in Minab, Iran], to the manifest injury of the United States." Tbh nearly every line of this article misrepresents various aspects of international AND domestic law in such an egregious manner that I'm tempted to do a deep-dive on just Article IV. Maybe there will be an opportunity to do so at some point in the future. For now, I'll just focus on the core of this allegation: that SECWAR Hegseth failed to comply with legal "obligations" involving civilian harm mitigation & reduction (CHMR). This is a topic I have previously addressed in more detail here: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/BrianCox_RLTW/status/2… The MAIN point to address here is that Congress doesn't possess the constitutional authority to FORCE DoW to implement specific CHMR practices. Congress can appropriate funds for such practices (Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 12). And Congress can "make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces" (Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 14). But POTUS is appointed as commander-in-chief of the military (Art. II, Sec. 2, Cl. 1). And practices related to civilian harm mitigation & reduction are strictly within the purview of CiC authority since they don't involve making rules for the armed forces (that authority is exercised by adopting the Uniform Code of Military Justice ... more about the UCMJ below). There are SO many other deficiencies in Article IV that demonstrate why the CMHR initiative has been flawed since @SecDefAustin & @JoeBiden initially implemented the program & that fundamentally misrepresent #LOAC obligations + command responsibility & so on. For present purposes, though, Art. IV fails to state a "high Crime or Misdemeanor" primarily because SEC WAR Hegseth has NO "obligation" to implement "laws and directives mandated" BY CONGRESS "for the protection of civilians during the commission of armed conflict" since CONGRESS exceeded its Art. I authority - at the expense of legitimate Art. II CiC authority - by purporting to "mandate" executive compliance in the first place. - Article V. The essential basis for the next allegation is: "Secretary Hegseth abused the authority and trust vested in him as Secretary of Defense not only by directing the unlawful use of lethal military force, resulting in the summary execution of at least 243 persons in international waters, but also by using his office to compel members of the Armed Forces to carry out such operations under false legal authorities that he caused to be constructed and imposed upon the chain of command." This claim is centered on the campaign of attacks directed against suspected narcoterrorists in international waters. Once again, this is a topic I've covered at length before (for example, here: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/BrianCox_RLTW/status/1…). The MAIN problem here (out of many) is the assertion that: "By subjecting persons merely suspected of criminal conduct to lethal military force without judicial process, without congressional authorization, and without establishing a lawful basis for treating such persons or vessels as military targets, Secretary Hegseth arrogated to himself and the Executive Branch the roles of judge, jury, and executioner and asserted a unilateral power to determine who may live and who may die." Of course, the "without congressional authorization" element returns us to the analysis from the WPR articles involving the concurrent constitutional powers to "declare war" (Congress) AND engage in "hostilities" (POTUS). Even so, the assertion that suspected narcoterrorists operating drug boats on the High Seas are MERELY "suspected of criminal conduct" is a gross misrepresentation of international law involving the resort to force (jus ad bellum) & domestic implementation thereof. See, this article explicitly acknowledges that an interagency task force developed a classified memo that presented "a legal basis for such strikes" by determining that the "United States is engaged in a noninternational armed conflict (NIAC) with 24 Latin American Designated Terrorist Organizations." Whether one disagrees with this determination or not, the EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO. And when it DID determine the existence of a noninternational armed conflict against drug cartels, by definition the adversary was no longer merely "suspected of criminal conduct." Yes, trafficking narcotics IS criminal conduct. But saying it is ONLY criminal conduct would be like claiming al-Qaeda operatives are "only" criminals since they're engaged in activity that is against the law. A drug dealer at home is a criminal. A narcotics trafficker on the High Seas that ISN'T part of a group the government has determined to be an adversarial belligerent in a (noninternational) armed conflict is ALSO a criminal. But a narcotrafficker on the High Seas that IS part of a group the government has determined to be an adversarial belligerent is a criminal AND a civilian taking direct part in hostilities (DPH). And what do we do with civilians DPH? Sure, we can detain them - but we can ALSO make them the object of attack pursuant to LOAC. That's what DoW did, that's what SECWAR Hegseth directed, and none of it constitutes a "high Crime or Misdemeanor". Article VI. The crux of the allegation here is: Using the powers of his office, Secretary Hegseth retaliated against and sought to intimidate United States Senator Mark Kelly for his statement through a scheme or course of conduct intended to interfere with Congress’ constitutional authority to oversee the Executive Branch, grossly expand Article II powers at the expense of both the Legislative and Judicial Branches of government, and establish a precedent that would chill the protected speech of millions of retired United States service members and inflict irreparable harm upon their First Amendment freedoms." Yet again, this is a subject I've covered in more detail previously (see, for example, here: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/BrianCox_RLTW/status/1…). For now, I'll just reiterate that @SenMarkKelly didn't MERELY say, "Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders." Of course, if that' ALL he had said, there probably wouldn't be any issue. After all, he IS right - servicemembers can, indeed must, refuse to comply with unlawful orders. The problem is, Sen Kelly AND the rest of the "Seditious 6" didn't just stop at that "reminder." What Article VI fails to mention is that Kelly (and the rest) ALSO repeatedly claimed actual orders provided by SECWAR Hegseth were illegal. First of all, they were all full of shit (see above, in particular, related to narcoterrorist ops). Even so, this messaging crusade of the Seditious 6 was essentially an effort to substitute their OWN judgment regarding what constitutes "lawful" orders for that of the duly appointed Secretary of War. And although this article condemns the move by SECWAR Hegseth to recall Sen Kelly to active duty as an abuse of power that would set "a precedent that would chill the protected speech of millions of retired United States service members and inflict irreparable harm upon their First Amendment freedoms," Hegseth was merely exercising EXISTING STATUTORY AUTHORITY established in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. That is, pursuant to Art. 2 of the UCMJ, retired servicemembers "who are entitled to pay" as Sen Kelly is, remain subject to the Code (pic 4). So reasonable views may certainly differ whether SECWAR Hegseth's move to reinstate Sen (ret Cpt) Kelly to face court-martial was ADVISABLE. But it certainly was NOT a "high Crime or Misdemeanor" if existing law permitted such a move. If Rep Massie doesn't like it, maybe he should introduce a motion to change THAT provision of the UCMJ - rather than wasting everyone's time with these frivolous articles of impeachment. Article VII. The essence of this claim is that SECWAR Hegseth used Dept of War "to carry out an unprecedented military operation—code-named ABSOLUTE RESOLVE—to capture and kidnap President Nicolás Maduro, the leader of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, and his wife, Cilia Flores, from Venezuela—an act of war against a sovereign country executed under the guise of narcotics law enforcement, though in actuality intended to assert U.S. control over Venezuela’s oil reserves." In doing so, according to this article, "Secretary Hegseth abused the powers of the Department of Defense, violated the laws and treaty obligations of the United States, and subordinated the constitutional allocation of war powers to Executive objectives neither authorized nor approved by Congress." No need for present purposes to address the "constitutional allocation of war powers" claim - though it is rather amusing that THIS article asserts the Maduro operation was "of a nature and magnitude rising to the level of constitutional war" yet the counter-narcoterrorist boat strikes were ... not (selective outrage much?). And, yes, this is also a topic I've addressed at length previously (see, for example, here: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/BrianCox_RLTW/status/2…). The MOST important point to keep in mind in relation to this allegation is that Maduro wasn't recognized as the 🇻🇪 head of state at the time of the raid that captured (er ... "kidnapped" 🤣) him. For confirmation, this is what @SecRubio said after the operation: "Maduro is NOT the President of Venezuela and his regime is NOT the legitimate government. Maduro is the head of the Cartel de Los Soles, a narco-terror organization which has taken possession of a country. And he is under indictment for pushing drugs into the United States." (xitter.twitterapi.xyz/SecRubio/status/194942…) So this operation wasn't a "kidnapping" as the article claims, nor was it an "act of war against a sovereign country." Maduro wasn't the head of state & the operation didn't constitute "international relations" in accordance with the UN Charter (as I have previously analyzed at the X post presented above). As such, once again, ordering & directing this operation doesn't constitute a "high Crime or Misdemeanor." Article VIII. The primary allegation here is: "Secretary Hegseth initiated and directed" hostilities in Yemen "in the absence of any of the predicates required in section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 for the President to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities." Since the goal here is to focus on the main points rather than also addressing the less central - though still conspicuous - deficiencies inherent in the articles, I'll refrain from getting into the weeds on some of the other points. The main point here, though, as it is with Articles I, II & III, is that the WPR has been unconstitutional from the start. If it's unconstitutional from the start (which, it still is), then it can't establish binding obligations. And if it can't establish binding obligations (which, it still can't), then "violating" its provisions isn't a legitimate legal basis for claiming "high Crimes and Misdemeanors". ____ Ok, that's it - at least for the main points - in relation to all 8 articles of impeachment. Each of the articles includes an assertion that SECWAR Hegseth "will remain a threat to the Constitution if allowed to remain in office," or words to that effect. In reality, the articles of impeachment are a sham - from beginning to end. And it is Rep Massie, not Sec Hegseth, who IS a clear & present threat to the Constitution - for abusing the impeachment powers vested in Congress by distorting international AND domestic law to create the false appearance that Hegseth's conduct amounts to "high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Thankfully, Rep Massie won't be allowed to remain in office himself since he got crushed in the primary in the great state of Kentucky. Even so, any member of Congress who supports or votes in favor of Massie's misguided articles of impeachment is ALSO "a threat to the Constitution" - and for the same reason. As such, any member who DOES support or vote for these articles should not be allowed to remain in office - and it will be up to their constituents to watch closely & hold them to account, where it counts, at the next election. #ImpeachmentHoax #GoHomeMassie

What do I see? They are at war. We are asleep at the wheel.

Mr President, the Constitution gives you & only you the power to address this. Right now there’s a major information operation underway to break the will & spirit of those who love this country. Their plan is obvious: crush the people forever by crushing you & dismantle the Republic. It is succeeding in part because many are upset our elections were not secured BEFORE the midterms. But frustration, fear & disappointment are not to be mistaken for stupidity. People know that as long as they focus on blame, they’re allowing those who rigged this election to get away with it. And they know what is at stake: without secure elections the Republic is lost. 2028 means nothing. So this is what they are counting you to do: 1) Pull together the new leaders from both sides (Senate & House) and call a national emergency meeting and hold it at Camp David. The purpose of the meeting is to ensure the preservation of our constitutional republic. This is a constitutional duty/requirement for every President - not simply a nice thing to do. And you have the legal authority. 2) Reduce gas prices immediately. You have the power to do this with the stroke of your pen. 3) Create a “Kitchen Cabinet” like others did before you with outside voices so those around you cannot isolate you from the truth or get away with lying to you. You need bold leaders who are willing to tell you the hard truths. 4) Call for full accountability on the elections according to the law: 100 percent audits, full access to the software & hardware in the machines, cast vote records, voter rolls & foreign interference. Millions are behind you regardless of what they want you & the world to believe. There is no universe in which marxism & sharia law are better choices than liberty & freedom, no matter how disenchated some may be. People know where this is headed. You are facing every enemy this nation has, both foreign & domestic, to include some in your party, your cabinet & your inner circle. They want you to lose your courage right now & go along with this. They have a plan to try defeat you at every turn, no matter which course of action you choose. But it does not end there: if justice & accountability do not prevail & you are persuaded to let them get away with this, then the real dirty war begins, starting with you & yours & everyone else they regard as a threat. This does not end here. There is no bargain to be made that is not a deal with the devil. Principles are devine. And there is only one truth.

🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 16: HOW THE MIDTERMS WERE PULLED OFF 🚨 Among today's talk of voter fraud, a critical role is overlooked: the importance of NGOs in early voting. Below, I show the receipts where NGOs directly take a role in making the midterms happen. It's been a long week, and I'm too tired to type up a summary. Just know the two main points: Republicans have an institutional blindness. They believe getting voters is all about branding and messaging. They pay enormous sums to consultants and TV ads and have endless conferences on what the right "message" is. Democrats, meanwhile, have built an entire and expensive institutional machinery around getting people physically to the polls. And they were more motivated in 2026 than any other year. I do NOT deny the existence of voter fraud. Saying the data doesn't show that others claim to show, is not equivalent to saying there is no fraud. As I've said in several posts today, the election system in the United States is structurally set up such that citizenship verification is an honor system. The biggest swings in 2026 were among young people and Hispanics. And 2026 was a concerted effort by NGOs like none other. Watch them in their own words how they pulled it off:

In May and June, I exposed how Iranian operative and alleged Iranian regime lobbyist Trita Parsi was in communication with White House officials who were leaking to him about the Iran war. @tparsi Now, months later, it appears someone is leaking situation room meetings to Trita Parsi. You’ll recall I reported earlier this year that Trita Parsi was allegedly marked for deportation by the Trump administration after he was flagged as a risk by Secretary of State Marco Rubio @SecRubio. This was even confirmed to me in May by a State Department official. Source: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/lauraloomer/status/207… The Quincy Institute then circulated an internal memo about how they were going to cover Tita’s defense with immigration lawyers, and the memo, which cited me, was leaked to me, confirming that Trita was facing the possibility of deportation. Source: xitter.twitterapi.xyz/lauraloomer/status/207… Trita is not a US citizen. He has Iranian and Swedish citizenship. Multiple GOP Senators have called for Trita to be investigated as an alleged lobbyist for the Iranian regime. In 2020, Senators @tedcruz, @SenTomCotton, and then Senator @GovBraun Mike Braun, who is the current Governor of Indiana, called on the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) to investigate the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a lobby group they believe acts as a "foreign agent of the Islamic Republic.” Trita likely was going to be deported, until he and his colleagues at Quincy allegedly called in a favor to a very senior official at the White House. Any wild guesses who that is? 🤔 Now, Trita has not been deported, and he is suggesting that highly private information from the Situation Room is being leaked to him. @SecRubio this would be the perfect time before the Democrats take over in January for you to revoke Trita Parsi’s visa and have him removed from our country. Again, I flagged all of this for the WH over 6 months ago. It won’t end well. Deport Trita Parsi!

For my Florida peeps...this is some funny shit!

👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼🚨🚨🚨🚨👇🏼👇🏼YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BELIEVE THIS! DLA Piper, the global law firm whose former CEO Sir Nigel Knowles SAT ON THE BOARD OF SMARTMATIC UNTIL DECEMBER 2020 and whose successor CEO worked directly underneath Nigel Knowles for over 15 years, the exact same law firm that represented Smartmatic in New Hampshire and went after @RudyGiuliani, quietly snuck into our Denver lawsuit with Eric Coomer back in August as co counsel for the Trump Campaign without telling us! You know Eric Coomer, the former Chief Architect of Dominion Voting Systems, radical leftist Antifa skinhead, and the guy who bragged Trump was not going to win because he made sure of it… and remember, SMARTMATIC PREVIOUSLY OWNED SEQUOIA/DOMINION ASSETS AND WORKED HAND IN GLOVE WITH THIS MACHINE CARTEL! We only found out two weeks ago on a phone call that DLA Piper had slipped into the case right before we finally go to trial in January, right after @PatrickByrne just beat Eric Coomer in Tampa, Florida, leaving blue Denver with a Polis appointed judge as the only place Coomer has ever won anything. Look at what DLA Piper partners Caryn Schechtman and Bob Alessi just did in our case… two weeks ago Caryn Schechtman tried to get word to me not to say a word publicly about DLA Piper while, unbeknownst to us, they were quietly pushing their pro hac vice admission through behind the scenes so the public and President Trump would never see it coming! When my attorney David Willson walked into that hearing, where they would not even let attorney Stephanie Lambert in the room, and confronted them over this massive conflict of interest, Caryn Schechtman actually threatened my attorney with SANCTIONS if we dared oppose them or file anything exposing their Smartmatic conflict to the court, the public, and @POTUS! My attorney looked right at her and said, "What are you, the plaintiff?" And while that was happening, DLA Piper partner Bob Alessi was sitting right next to Eric Coomer's lawyer Charlie Cain… the same Charlie Cain who tried to physically go after 80 year old attorney Peter Ticktin, President Trump's friend, down in Florida… whispering back and forth with Coomer's counsel at the table like they are on the exact same team! @POTUS @realDonaldTrump, how in the world did this law firm get anywhere near your defense?! How do you let a Smartmatic tied law firm put the wolf right inside the henhouse on a cut and dry case where we already proved by Eric Coomer's own admissions and depositions that he is a flat out liar?! This is the exact same Eric Coomer who was on the CISA call on November 2, 2020 the day before the election, who had live VPN access into the election system databases ON ELECTION NIGHT, November 3, 2020 while sitting in Cook County, Chicago that other people inside Dominion set up for him, and who then went before the Georgia grand jury to get you indicted and perjured himself claiming he had neither the access nor the capability! We proved he had the access, we proved he had the motive, and the whole country lived through what happened in 2020! DLA Piper is actively blowing up the Joint Defense Agreement, trying to gag us with sanctions threats while whispering with Team Evil's lawyers, and I will NEVER hand over a single shred of our evidence or witness strategy to a compromised Smartmatic law firm before I take the stand in January! FIRE DLA PIPER MR. PRESIDENT! Fire Caryn Schechtman, fire Bob Alessi, and get DLA Piper off your team immediately! They are spitting in the face of everyone who has bled and fought for the truth for six years while protecting the narrative for the people who came after you and stole our country. Watch the video, share this everywhere, and make sure President Trump sees who is sitting at his table! @RealWayneRoot @gatewaypundit @jimhoft_ @laralogan @realtinapeters @PatrickByrne

I'm still with Trump.

NEW: #Russiagate conspirator Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden and his wife have been ordered to pay $1.5 million to settle a DOJ faud investigation into their filing a false claim for Covid PPP funds for their Strand Book Store in NYC in violation of SBA statutes justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/stran…

🚨 BREAKING: TRUMP ANNOUNCES DEAL WITH NETANYAHU TO END $4 BILLION IN ANNUAL MILITARY AID TO ISRAEL! “NETANYAHU AND I HAVE MADE A DEAL…WE'RE STOPPING!” Trump says Israel agrees with the decision: “HE'S VERY UNDERSTANDING OF IT.” “WHY ARE WE GIVING ISRAEL $4B? TAKE THAT OFF THE TABLE, THEY DON'T NEED IT!”

I AM SO DISAPPOINTED. I was denied media credentials by the White House! So I cannot cover Pres. Trump’s speech a the Lincoln Reflecting Pool for all of you! What reporter knows more about the project than me?