DerKauz (@der_kauz693) profile picture
Joined November 2025
Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)Photo by DerKauz (@der_kauz693)
DerKauz retweeted
You need to understand that the views published in Salon are not contained. They are thriving in Congress, universities, entertainment and corporate America.
Today, after 31 years, we are saddened to announce that Salon is ceasing publication. It has been an extraordinary privilege. salon.com/2026/11/05/goodbye…
24
122
9
1,000
15,723
The votes of young men are much swingier than in the past. Men didn’t become Republicans in 2024, and they didn’t become Democrats last night. Both parties need to compete for the votes of men, especially younger men, to succeed in 2028. ofboysandmen.substack.com/p/…
7
28
5
156
10,282
Our new survey with @ThirdWayTweet finds that around 76% of men under 50 say boys’ and men’s issues aren’t taken seriously. The data shows that they want lower costs, mental health support, and childcare & paid leave for dads. aibm.org/research/priorities…
6
19
6
71
10,480
I don't normally react to this account. But I rather feel there might be another factor here that is being left unsaid.
Conflict places more of the care burden on women and girls' shoulders. #Peace and security require more than their unpaid labor. Women and girls must be at the heart of peacebuilding. 🔗 See more on the @UN Secretary-General's report on #WomenPeaceSecurity: unwomen.org/en/articles/expl…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Men/boys are the large majority of combat deaths in conflicts — omitted. Boys also do care work — omitted. Saying women & girls must be “at the heart” of peacebuilding is prioritisation, not equality. Higher unpaid care ratios occur because men are dying or fighting. justsecurity.org/104722/gender-… ukraine.un.org/uk/download/20…
31
58
8
1,167
67,261
Yup. Generations of sneering "we don't need men" and "the future is female", evaporates in the most terrifying way imaginable, as the young men whose soul we've chipped away at for decades, are needed as meat shields. (no hard feelings against Wes, IMO he's done a lot for men)
30
64
3
425
12,622
DerKauz retweeted
Von der Leyen now blames Russia for "weaponising migration" against Europe. This woman spent years calling mass migration the EU's greatest strength. But when it backfires, it's Russia's fault. Her lies know no bounds.
1,613
5,621
491
17,698
254,615
We held an important roundtable with @CPRMenBoys who host the Boys' Education Commission looking at improving boys' attainment, literacy and engagement. Find out more here: menandboys.org.uk/boys-educa… and on LinkedIn too linkedin.com/posts/boys-educ…
1
5
9
193
29
268
10
1,142
8,835
WHEN “GENDER EQUALITY” MEANS THAT MEN MUST DO MORE FOR THE SAME REWARD... Equality for women. Extra obligations for men. That's not really equality at all. A revealing new Quillette article by Professor Jukka Savolainen exposes a glaring double standard in professional tennis: quillette.com/2026/10/11/equ… At the 2026 US Open: 🎾 Men had to win three sets to advance. Women only two. 🎾 Men accumulated 58% more playing time across the tournament. 🎾 Men played 60% more sets and 64% more games. 💰 Yet both sexes received exactly the same total singles prize money: US$37.84 million each. When calculated per player-hour, women received approximately 58% more prize money. Of course, prize money isn't an hourly wage. But why should men face substantially greater competitive demands for identical rewards? This illustrates a fundamental problem with some approaches to so-called “Gender Equality”: equality of outcomes is demanded while inequality of obligations is completely ignored... When women are disadvantaged, we're told it's systemic discrimination requiring urgent correction. When men are disadvantaged, the disparity is too often rationalised, dismissed or simply ignored. Not good enough. And it's time for us to do much better. This isn't an argument against women's sport or equal opportunities. It's an argument for consistent principles, reciprocal fairness and equal consideration for both sexes... Real gender equality cannot mean preferential treatment for women and additional burdens for men. That's immoral and utterly unfair. Equality must work BOTH ways. Otherwise, it isn't equality. Source: Equal Pay, Unequal Work, Jukka Savolainen, Quillette, 11 October 2026. #GenderEquality #MensEquality #Fairness #MensRights #EqualityForAll #Tennis #USOpen #MenAndBoys
11
59
2
275
4,809
Coverage of our Symposium on Young American Men in The Washington Sun 🙌 It was so great to have leaders like Sen. Ruben Gallego and Rep. Ro Khanna show up and speak out. I hope it grows from here! washingtonsun.com/national/r… @MenSymposium
3
8
44
2,110
Kudos to @JohnsonEmma for speaking on this. The challenges facing boys and young men should not belong to one political party. No matter your politics, we should all be able to agree that we need to do better by our young boys and men. richmond.com/opinion/column/…
1
6
1
34
1,554
Dr Mary Koss believes it's "inappropriate" to consider a man as a rape victim, when perpetrated by a woman, and that such men are "ambivalent about their sexual desires". I have no doubt that many people hold similarly awful, rape-apologist views about women – but Dr Koss is not just some online bigot. She is probably the most powerful feminist researcher in sexual violence in all of America. She has literally advised the CDC (as well as the NIH, the WHO, the APA and the Office of Women's Health), at the highest level. This is the difference I often find – Both sides have their bad eggs, but the bad eggs within the men's sector are rightfully excoriated, rather than lifted up, showered with praise, given distinguished careers, and handed influence at the highest levels of power.
24
48
11
306
11,845
Yet again, a video attempting to uproot the life saving Office for Men’s Health Bill, has gone viral. It has hundreds of thousands of views and likes, and endless angry comments, in less than twelve hours. Because, who cares that American men lead in 13 of the top 15 causes of death, that they die more at every age than women, and have worse health outcomes in every racial, ethnic and socioeconomic group? Instead, here’s the familiar ‘women were excluded from clinical trials’ slogan, and another about male rats, and “something something, male bodies were centred” slop. Look - There are TEN federal, tax funded Offices for Women’s Health, and ZERO for men - despite men’s awful health outcomes. And yet, clearly one is still too many for low effort, narcissistic, rage bait grifters like @katiecouric.
49
127
17
527
62,529
it feels so tru.
102
8
678
50,916
Best use of AI I've seen this year
1,658
32,470
1,719
255,648
27,747,984
2,459
23,349
1,915
151,887
3,605,346
13
64
5
1,381
97,014
The updated “for every 100 girls/women” list from @Mark_J_Perry. Look at all that male privilege!… 😑
24
187
10
1,001
26,068
The lead author of this paper, Paula McDonald, is the Pro Vice Chancellor of Research at Queensland University of Technology. McDonald posits that merit, which she puts in quotes in the paper, gets in the way of achieving "gender equality" and thus should be largely sidelined and replaced by "positive discrimination" that advantages women in the hiring process (e.g., quotas).
32
55
4
222
6,570