Praise Jesus. This should be enough for judges to start issuing arrest warrants.
🚨 BOOM! JAMES O’KEEFE JUST DROPPED A NUKE — WIDESPREAD VOTE BUYING RING EXPOSED NATIONWIDE AS DEMS (AND SECRET RINOS) PAY $5-$8 PER BALLOT TO RIG EVERY ELECTION!
Undercover footage catches these hired guns openly bragging: “I’m bringing in 3500 votes”… “He was paying me $5k a month, now it’s $8k!” Even judges and Texas Republicans caught secretly working for Democrats while funneling thousands of fake ballots!
This is the Deep State’s desperate election theft machine in action — our Republic is being sold out in broad daylight for chump change!
We NEED the SAVE AMERICA ACT PASSED IMMEDIATELY + MASS ARRESTS and PROSECUTIONS for these treasonous fraudsters before they steal 2026 too!
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
2
34
blaine ® retweeted
This. This is how you recruit the kind of men who should be in the Marine Corps.
Honestly it’s hard not to be black-pilled from a cyber perspective.
We had a record total of 17,000+ CVEs in October 2026 alone.
Just this week for the first time in my career I’m seeing a terminal2shell CVE with a “CVSS 11/10” effecting every shell since 1971 - that’s like RIP computing bad.
We have to do major reform in our election system now and **NOT the NPVIC!!**
They’re already ahead of the game and if they get their version, it’s over.
The cybersecurity principle is straightforward and well-established: for any high-value or high-integrity system, self-attestation is a weak control. You do not secure a network, a bank account, a classified system, or access to sensitive facilities by asking someone to check a box and sign a statement that they are authorized. You require independent verification of identity and eligibility - credentials, cryptographic proofs, database checks against authoritative sources, or physical documents. Legal deterrents (perjury, fines, jail) are useful backstops; they are not a substitute for the control itself.
Applied to voter registration, the current federal baseline fails that test. The National Voter Registration Act and Supreme Court precedent (Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona) largely lock states into accepting the federal form’s citizenship attestation under penalty of perjury for federal elections. Most states therefore treat the checkbox-plus-signature as sufficient at the point of registration. Additional checks (DMV data matching, SAVE queries against immigration records, jury-summons responses indicating non-citizenship, Social Security number matching) exist in many places and function as partial independent verification, but they are incomplete, often post-registration, and unevenly applied. They do not amount to a systematic, proactive proof of citizenship for every registrant.
That gap is real. A non-citizen who obtains a driver’s license (legal in many states), fills out a form, and checks the box can end up on the rolls. Detection then depends on later list-maintenance processes, data matches that produce false positives and require manual follow-up, or someone else noticing. The system is designed around the assumption that the combination of legal risk plus downstream cleaning is adequate. From a pure control-design perspective, that is weaker than requiring documentary evidence of citizenship (birth certificate, passport, naturalization certificate, or a verified state ID that itself required such proof) at registration, the way employment eligibility (I-9/E-Verify), many benefits programs, or passport issuance already do.
If we do not reform NOW we will never have a true and honest election again.
The wall is good, praise Jesus, but it’s a dollar late and a day short.
cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-d…
6
78
We need to make this a “thing” please, political friends.
Open source national election software with public audits is a strong idea for transparency. Expert design plus careful engineering and anyone free to inspect the code would address the patchwork of local systems. Getting every jurisdiction to adopt it remains the bigger challenge, but the principle of verifiable, reviewable systems is sound.
5
82
blaine ® retweeted
Herein lies @tgc's most recent attempt to use grace to destroy nature.
"And this raises a bigger question; if church is meant to be a gathering of our spiritual family, why are we sitting in our earthly families in the first place?" 🤦♂️
au.thegospelcoalition.org/ar…
So yeah, turns out:
Once you realize this is a hack in progress it all makes a lot more sense.
- All the people who were fired in the first DOGE sweep didn’t just disappear in a puff of smoke. nytimes.com/2026/04/21/us/po…
- Wiles was basically the CFO of lobbying in Washington, DC.
citizen.org/article/meet-sus…
- Those ex-NGO folks formed a coalition or super PAC of sorts and mobilized with tons of money before many were even fired - this includes ex-intel people.
foxnews.com/politics/meet-fa…
- Over 4.5 million Social Security numbers were issued to non-citizens between 2022 and 2025 through their little “EBE” program.
cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-d…
- Therefore, many likely voted, and if challenged, a court may dismiss it because it would be ruled they were legal votes (it's as if someone somewhere is perfectly tuned to the fact the speed of government is slow and we don't have much in place to have prevented this - unironically enough those who just won across the board in an unprecedented national surge are the same ones who have orchestrated the overloading of our immigration system.)
- They’ve split conservatives since Charlie’s assassination, so nobody from our camp can keep up much - with the exception of @DataRepublican, who told us most of this weeks ago.
[https]://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/DataRepublican/status/2112157558765203878?a=OFc6fV7E1xK4LOI8j40&s=20
- We’re all already hostages to a planned and organized coup that’s waiting to mobilize foot power in the event we call for the election not to be certified. They know we know this as well, yet Republicans are basically silent on the issue for some reason.
[https]://xitter.twitterapi.xyz/DataRepublican/status/2119600781896847702?a=_YVg-5YvYbXh-EhDTuE&s=20
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/DataRepublican/status/…
- After deep-diving into the history of our election system and the slow transition to digital and the centralization of election resources (on both the campaign and election sides), I’m fairly certain we’ve been cooked since about 2012.
dixiereformanda.substack.com…
- The first thing to look for in the coming months after a change of power is the push for the NPVIC - national centralized popular vote and elections. All the plumbing is in place now, and they’re waiting to flip the switch.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation…
- The backbone and software are essentially already built for this very thing. The system is live, built, online, and connected already all while the vast majority of US voters likely have had no clue - and still don't.
tigerndr-usa-elections-2026.…
- We’re all basically getting socialism because of Republicans and their crippled egos around Donald J. Trump. They were critical to every bit of what Democrats just accomplished and are trying to accomplish now.
politico.com/news/magazine/2…
- None of them will ever release the Epstein files.
cnn.com/2026/02/15/politics/…
- Jesus Christ is King of kings and Lord of lords, and no less sovereign. Nations fall away. No maverick molecule exists in the entire universe outside of His dominion. Believe it or not, there is good news.
learn.ligonier.org/qas/what-…
Revelation 17:14; 19:16; Colossians 1:16–17; Psalm 2; Daniel 2:21; Isaiah 40:15–17; Ephesians 1:20–23; Philippians 2:9–11.
~Soli Deo Gloria~
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / THE INSURRECTION PLAYBOOK, SPECIAL EDITION: ON CROSSING THE RUBICON 🚨
Many people on 𝕏 are calling for elections to not to be certified, or for Trump to not to seat the new Congress on January 3rd.
In a sense, attributing 2026 results to cheating is too narrow of a way to look at a much larger and a much worse problem.
The problem isn't that machines decided to flip 15% of Republican votes and stole the 2026 midterms from us.
The problem is that our elections are untransparent, monopolized by mysterious NGOs, and set up institutionally such that they are impossible to challenge or audit honestly.
I wrote a book, UNELECTED. It lays out the whole NGO Administrative Complex and how they have monopolized virtually every facet of our ordinary society and perform functions through, above, and despite Congress. This is what they do. They cut off every single plausible path to their own reform.
The last two chapters explain my remedy, but I do not believe these chapters are easily approached without reading the other 300+ pages first. And I've had fans compare it to "A Brief History of Time" in complexity ... while I wouldn't go that far, it is an enormous problem with an enormous network that developed over an enormous amount of time.
The good news is that our anger at finding out about this, and our lashing out at all this is the epistemic bubble popping. Regimes don't last long after that.
The bad news is - to borrow a phrase my friend uses - there are many ways to lose, and few ways to preserve our Republic.
I'm not here to tell you that President Trump shouldn't use the 2026 elections to force a showdown.
I'm here to tell you what happens if he does. If he goes down this route, he better treat it like crossing the Rubicon.
Pray for peace and wisdom for the administration as they deal with the many difficult decisions ahead.
Watch the video with an open mind and heart.
blaine ® retweeted
Our Lord commands us to focus on the means, not the ends.
Our Lord takes care of the ends.
Defend the Republic.
Despite our post-election gloom there is one practical reason not to despair. Several times in the last two decades we feared we were close to losing our republic, and each time we came back, most decisively in 2024.
The radical change in the elections from 2024 to 2026 demonstrates that our system is still extraordinarily fluid and that if we regroup, we can turn this around in 2028 or soon thereafter.
Granted, the system seems to favor those who have no qualms about breaking the rules. Granted, the Democrats will continue trying to game the system with ballot harvesting and opposing election integrity measures. They will try to destroy the Constitution (e.g., court stacking) to the point that we can't come back through democratic means.
But, for now, at least, we still have a constitutionalist majority on the Court that will impede their efforts. And if they overplay their hand as they always do, they may wake people out of their slumber before that majority is gone.
One thing that will make our job more difficult is that our side is dangerously divided. We can say that Tucker and his band of Groypers are in the minority, but we can't deny they've had a major impact demoralizing us at the very least -- and pitting us against each other with a vengeance.
Always before in my long history of political involvement and activism, I've felt like our side was fighting against the evil forces that fully intended to replace the Constitution with anarchy and capitalism with socialism. But now it seems our energy is aimed against each other. Our friendly fire is anything but friendly.
I make no apology for opposing the antisemites in our midst. We always have to fight pure evil.
But we don't need to let those miscreants divide the rest of us. We have to remain united in our fight for the Constitution, our liberty and our values.
It's a tall order, but the alternative is surrender. And that will never happen.
No, we shouldn't panic, but yes, we must unite and fight. But unification is going to require discernment to recognize imposters among us. Tucker and the Groypers position themselves inside our tent so they can stir chaos and do maximum damage.
Instead of looking at this as a sign of permanent destruction we must interpret it as a wake-up call and, operating within the system and following our principles, make whatever adjustments are necessary to preserve the Republic.
For my liberal friends - your blue line so efficiently playing "copy cat" with the red line's trajectory is why we think you're cheating. That's not normal human "polarization" and "demographic unity shifts" your libspeak can't explain this. That's why we're going to keep calling for adequate investigations. Time to scrape metal, @DOGE.
blaine ® retweeted
I'm not an electon-denier, nor an election-denier-denier. But when numbers don't line up with a reasonable explanation we can't have confidence in elections.
My first line of suspicion is when a party says, "You can't look and you are suspect for asking". Democrats perform a lot of drama about Democracy but a lot of suspicion about asking basic questions about the security of voting.
If Abbot and many Republicans performed normally, why did Democrat votes in a midterm perform so much better than a general election under Biden or Harris or any other midterm?
I've seen how Abbott performed better than previous elections but his Democrat opponent got 1.7 million more votes than Harris did. I looked up census data and asked how many people migrated from Liberal states like California to Texas in the last ten years and it was only 1 million people. Assuming 100% voted in the midterms for Abbott's opponent, it still falls short of any explanation I can think of.
Maybe some Democrats can explain their reason. Did the party not have a good get-out-the-vote in 2020 and 2024 and suddenly they discovered one?
Or maybe a Republican can explain why we thought a cheat happened in 2020 and somehow Democrats where able to create enough fake mail-in ballots or have enough illegals voting to account for 1.7 million votes? Accusations aren't enough without hard evidence, and if 1.7 million people cheated, someone would have a smoking gun. Not a magic "Soros did it!" but real evidence because it would be everywhere.
No Democrat can convince me not to look or ask the question but no Republican should be satisfied with an easy accusation. The Arizona audit in 2021 made the most sense because people actually looked at ballots and tried to use forensics to explain something, even if it didn't produce anything reliable.
If no explanation is needed, then I hope Republicans implement the same system the Dems did for 2028 and flip New York, California, Washington, Maine and Oregon with 1.7 million "voters" coming from nowhere and no investigation or explanation allowed. If this is how elections are done, then both sides need to be able to do the same thing.
I ran the numbers.
With the exception of Ken Paxton*, Texas Republican midterm statewide candidates slightly outperformed historical expectations.
Democrats UNPRECEDENTEDLY outperformed them.
Prior to 2026, it was rare for a statewide race candidate to outperform the presidential candidate of two years prior.
In 2026, EVERY SINGLE STATEWIDE CANDIDATE obtained more raw votes than Kamala Harris.
This has never happened before.
Methods.
I asked: What average % of the presidential vote does each Texas statewide race candidate get in the midterms, for each party?
Then I compared what each candidate was expected to get, based on historical trends since 1992**, to what they actually got in 2026.
The present figure is after adjusting for which party had a president in office; midterm turnout is on average higher for parties who lost the presidency.
The unadjusted version is in the next, threaded post, for completeness.
* Paxton would have lost even if he had performed at slightly above historical expectation, as other Republican candidates had, as you can see in the right-hand figure.
** Texas and national politics worked very differently before the 1990s, with many conservatives voting Republican for president and Democrat for state office. They are not comparable.
blaine ® retweeted
Air Gapped + Self Hosted is SO BACK
if you’re working for a company in cybersecurity, you should be evaluating your options to abstract your companies services from the internet
what i mean is: why allow an unauthenticated anonymous agent of an attacker to interact with your systems?
consider your architectural levers now, you’re going to need them
blaine ® retweeted
FACT CHECK: Bill, you are wrong about paper ballot audits. @mitchellvii
Without commenting about whether there is an algorithm at work, states like Texas either use a series of dice rolls or a lottery ball machine to select precincts for “random” paper ballot audits. Many won’t even let you inspect a physical sample of paper, and will push ballot images.
Regardless, here’s the problem: The number of potential numeric combinations (approximately a million possibilities) from the dice rolls or lottery system, wildly exceed the number of precincts in a state. Meaning, there isn’t a 1 to 1 relationship. As a result, auditors are entering the dice roll or lottery selection into a COMPUTER, which then SELECTS a precinct through a program.
It’s not random.
We’ve audited many counties and performed a state wide study of the precincts “randomly” selected.
The SAME set of precincts were selected over and over again.
Part of the cheat is to direct auditors to clean precincts under the auspices of randomness.
It’s a magic trick.
Second, the sample number of physical ballots is so statistically insignificant that auditors cannot draw meaningful conclusions.
Signed,
A guy who has done audits
🇺🇸 FRAUD REALITY CHECK: Here's the simplest reason the 85/15 ALGORITHM theory falls apart in TEXAS: PAPER.
Since a 2021 state law, every voting machine in Texas has to produce a paper record of every vote.
After the election, counties pull a sample of those paper ballots and HAND COUNT them. Then they compare the hand count to what the machines reported. The Secretary of State picks which precincts get checked, and candidates can send people to watch.
An algorithm can change a number on a computer. It can't change a piece of paper sitting in a locked box.
If machines had flipped 15% of the vote, the paper and the computer would disagree, and the audit would catch it right away. 🚨
No mismatch, no algorithm.
We are getting closer and closer to finding this smelly fish, y’all. 💻 🇺🇸
If I was going to do it, I wouldn’t even touch the votes on Election Day. I’d have it whipped by the time the polling places opened.
This is a piece of the entire system showing how mail-in ballots are tracked and processed. The monitoring systems the two campaigns use to track the ballots is the place I’d hunt for egress first if I were the “bad man.”
This is the unique place where campaign nodes communicate with the actual election nodes throughout the election, across the historically real and physical air gap.
**This is NOT what I define as truly air-gapped.**
Has anyone ever heard of these companies/products or have any additional information?
-TargetEarly
-i360 (absentee dashboards)
-Catalist
Also - how does monitoring from each party work for the processing of early mail in ballots? Like Election Day or…? These are the questions I’m starting to wonder. Take it with a grain of salt.
3
72