I mean, I have covered Trump for the past 11 consecutive years. I literally spend all day every day talking to people who are telling me how blackpilled they are over this or that...
Daniel Walters (@danielwreporter) profile pictureDaniel Walters@danielwreporterNov 5
Yeah, the idea that three New York Times reporters didn't know that white-pilled/black-pilled meant didn't pass the smell test:

Nov 5, 2026 · 4:42 PM UTC

28
20
494
184,537
RelevantRecentLikes
Your use of "literally" is worrying me here!
1
2,313
My blood pressure pills are blue. What does it mean?
2
11
6,516
One man's ear plugs are another man's bullets. I never thought of media high priests to be the gold standard of all that is intelligent or nuanced. That said - Sins of omission and torquing are your stock-in-trade. Which of course makes you evil liars..."mate".
Image from Ed (@EdCorrigan31633)
1,623
Poorly written tweet by Peter I’d say
2
2,365
This is ridiculous banter.
2,445
Just finished reading Regime Change. A great read. Thanks to you and @maggieNYT.
3
664
What does white-pilled and black-pilled mean
1
1,839
then maybe you should have edited your inbred mate's work before putting his foot in his mouth like he did
1
1,584
Your latest excuse for "journalism." I'm still waiting for your article about Jamie Raskin "threatening" private law firms when he announced on MS NOW he would use the power of Congress to "go after" them. Where's that coverage, mate? nytimes.com/2026/11/11/us/po…
White House Threatens Congress, Saying Aggressive Investigations Could Be Crime

White House Threatens Congress, Saying Aggressive Investigations Could Be Crime

As Democrats prepared to begin oversight inquiries, it was not clear what legal basis could support the threat. The Constitution grants lawmakers immunity for legislative acts.

nytimes.com
5
Too bad you don't have the balls to write about his obvious physical and mental deterioration. Are you saving it for a book? Afraid to cross a line, lose your access? Here's what I do know: You make me happy to be an ex-subscriber. Regards, one disgusted veteran
1
812
Here's Democrat Jamie Raskin threatening to use his power to "go after" private citizens, but no article about that from you, Savage, Schmidt or the rest of the NY Times anti-Trump resistance squad. Do you think we don't notice, you pathetic hack? xitter-newx.xyz-mikolabs.workers.dev/theblaze/status/211841…
TheBlaze (@theblaze) profile pictureTheBlaze
@theblazeNov 5
Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin: “We will not hesitate to go after private corporations that are collaborating with Donald Trump. We’ve done it before and will do it again.”
7
I will admit that the wording in the article did confuse me slightly as to whether the reference to cyanide was understood properly, just because it is lacking that quote that makes it explicit. But yeah, it's super weird to assume y'all are that out of touch
24
You’re describing a cult. But that’s not how you approached it.
1,214
You do that literally, do you? Good on ya. Mate.
1,201
I know I am middle aged, because I can never keep the different pills straight. I need a glossary!
1,449
This is the best thing they’ve got on you, Habberman and Baker in years…. You guys are fine and have literally never done anything wrong
2,280
fwiw, I did not doubt this. I think the tweet was just confusing really.
3,435
They think they have some special inside language only they know. Kind of pathetic.
3,822
You're a little douche. Go back to whatever country you came from
1
1
717
You’re a foreign mid-wit. Go home & throw some shrimp on the barbie, mate. Like, fuck off.
50
I admire your ethics Jonathan.☮️
99
You need better editors then
290
it was kind of confusing
1
792
Load more replies