The primary forces that are destroying society are as follows:
1. Eugenics. No, not the idea that the human gene pool should be improved. The hijacking of that idea by psychopaths and sociopaths, who use it as an excuse to destroy potential competitors. Everyone wants the gene pool improved, but proliferating the genes of psychopaths and sociopaths has not improved the world at all. If anything, consistent weeding out of those through warfare and such is the reason for the existence of civilization.
2. Malthusianism. It's a lie that the world is overpopulated. What this really means is that the population is too large for tyrants to control with violence, and/or they want to murder and sterilize people that they don't have a use for. That ties in perfectly with Eugenics.
3. The fiat currency Ponzi scheme. It's a caste system which disadvantages the public by advantaging those who are in control of the money supply. If you cannot "borrow" money created out of thin air at 0% interest then you are not in the upper caste. Too big to fail organizations clearly have preferential treatment through bailouts, quantitative easing, stock buybacks, etc.
I will even go so far as to say that these people who say that they want Eugenics, want the complete opposite. They don't want competitors, they want docile, obedient who are the minimum necessary intelligence to accomplish their assigned task. These people are not only noncompetitive, they are EXTREME anti-merit. They don't want to be better than you, they just want you to be less than them.
βCivil Rightsβ is just an encrypted phrase facade for enslaving all races of people, worldwide indiscriminately via financial fraud and the conquest of people of European descent who traditionally fought that financial fraud.
They donβt care about any of you.
Equality of apathy.
1
35
..and if you donβt believe me, then ask yourself why your βcivil rightsβ champions advocated for Gaddafi to be sodomized with a knife.. youtu.be/FmIRYvJQeHM?is=jDsEβ¦
28
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Replying to @ericweinstein
Didnβt you just recently post that this behavior is predatory?..
People who cheated at *everything* are not "winners".
People who were cheated are not "losers".
This is not "competition".
This, is not "excellence".
30
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
I'm sure this will age well
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Ironically, it takes Chinese honeypot espionage to get academia to admit 'those Red Pill guys' have been right about women and sex all along.
You don't have to like reality, but you do have to live in it.
Replying to @NobodysWorry @DearS_o_n
Look boy, I have seen this time after time for years after growing up in the poorest state in the union: Mississippi. It happens over, and over, and over, and over. There is the way you *wish* things were, and then there is the way they actually are. It doesn't matter how capable you are; it's their perception of that capability. Yes, there are guys who look like scrawny weaklings that can fight like hell; but they are perceived as weak so that is the trigger.. and YES, I have seen some very underestimated dudes come out on top of a fight after being marked for bullying. Likewise, I have seen evil people win a fight that I wished they hadn't. The world is what it is. I don't make the rules.
Humans prey on the weak (based on their perception)
It's not my wish.
It is what it is.
Stating a fact of life isn't the same as endorsing that fact.
28
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
When Iβm wrong, Iβm wrong. I thought when unemployment was low, GDP was hi, household income rose, it meant everyone was winning.
Not true.
The American economy has decoupled the economic progress of asset owners from wage earners to such a degree that broad based measures of success are no longer reliable measures of progress.
This single issue of asset ownership vs progress of wage earners will be the defining issue in all future elections.
Other issues will get caught in the interpretation (price of eggs, Iran war, price of gas etc) but the candidate that realizes that those are downstream of asset vs wage earners and gets their messaging focused on it will win.
No amount of money spent in an election or gerrymandering will change this outcome.
That is what I learned on Nov3.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Replying to @ChrisWillx
According to women, the *majority* of men are low value, and low status, because society doesn't want to pay the males who do the crucial physical labor that prop up the infrastructure well enough to have and support a family.
Men were also nonstop deceived and gaslit by fake movie/television portrayals of people acting nothing like the way people operate in real life, while they were young boys.
They were told they would be loved unconditionally and that they didn't have to be competitive.
They were told "everyone has a soulmate", there is someone for everyone, and women will love you for "who you are", as well as "just be yourself".
"Guys who have nothing going for them" - define that please.. because last time I checked if a man props up civilization with his labor and stays out of crime, that should be enough. Not everyone can be rich, but there is no civilization without the produce of the farmer. The average blue collar male worker makes approximately 50k a year. Over 50% of men, regardless of their positive contribution to the economy, are considered "broke" by the decadent, over the top expectations of spoiled Western women who supported the driving down of wages and driving up of the cost of living via government spending and mass illegal immigration to prop up the Ponzi scheme financial system.. which in Europe was responsible for letting a Trojan horse into their countries, and might in fact have already let a Trojan horse into the US.
"No drive in life" - for a lot of men the primary motivator and incentive to do anything is love of family, and pursuit of reproduction. If you don't understand that, you genuinely don't even understand the engine of the entire economy. Why would a man left behind by civilization on purpose be motivated to do anything other than the bare minimum? Instead of leadership, there are only scoffers.
Civilization lied. Full stop. The men who were deceived, were abandoned. Most of all, the "top status" men benefited from banker money cheating of a fraudulent financial system that loans money created out of thin air at interest that doesn't exist in the money supply.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
π¨ BOMBSHELL: New FOIA Documents Reveal the COVID Pandemic Was a DoD Operation Dating Back to Obama
"The Pentagon controlled the COVID-19 program from the very beginning and everything we were told was political theater to cover it up right down to the FDA vaccine approval"
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Most of you don't yet realize that the real globalist plan isn't to have Democrats run America.
The real globalist plan is mass extermination of the human population across the planet, including the USA, and including the Democrat masses that live in the cities.
The most powerful globalists don't really bother with lower-level party politics. They play their evil games on a planetary scale. And Earth has been scheduled for mass human extermination for reasons I've covered in my podcasts on Bright Videos.
If you're worried that "immigrants will vote in 2030!" then you are already three steps behind the real game here. Illegal immigrants were only the interim pawns. The larger goal is the elimination of around 7 out of 8 currently living human beings. This can largely be achieved, of course, with a global power grid outage, a global nuclear war, a near-global monetary reset and currency collapse, a global energy supply chain blockage or global fertilizer shortages. Or any combination of those.
Guess how many of those have already been set into motion at some level?
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Replying to @xianghu73574129
Capitalism never existed because bankers cheat at money, and always have.
Central banks are not capitalism, and that's why people hate the current system, and even communism/socialism: Centralized credit in the hands of the state with state capital is just bankers cheating at money.
So many people do not want to work for a living because it's easier to use state violence and mob rule to enslave someone else.
The majority of modern communists aren't even blue collar and never did a hard day's work in their lives.. AND they don't know the history of banking, AND they never connected the Rothschild banking dynasty to communism/socialism and centralized credit in the hands of the state with state capital.
AND
They didn't connect the Jewish mafia to all of that, even though they can opposed a genocide being committed by Israel, which was founded by said banking dynasties..
Finance is the caste system that replaced royalty.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Replying to @philthatremains
Except every monarchy ever was circumvented by money masters. Also, psychopaths are not worthy. King Phillip borrowed money and then stiffed the Knights Templar, followed by having them hunted down and killed. Bankers rule monarchs.












