ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Replying to @kryptosari
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
similar thing is how the “Chinese cooking demystified” channel recently did a video on pre-Columbian exchange Chinese food and it being filled with recipes using dill, mustard, thyme and stuff like goat cheeses that resembled paneer or halloumi, doesn’t read as Chinese to us
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
🚨 BOOM!!! FLORIDA CFO JUST WENT FULL NUCLEAR 🚨
He just said the quiet part out loud: The EASIEST way to kill sanctuary cities forever?
Start CHARGING Democrat politicians as ACCESSORIES to every murder, rape, and child rape committed by the illegals they protect.
Make them LEGALLY responsible.
Because let’s be real — those crimes NEVER would have happened without their sanctuary policies.
They are COMPLICIT. Period.
This is how you end it for good.
No more hiding behind “compassion.”
Share this EVERYWHERE. Every single sanctuary traitor needs to see it.
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Again, until guys like this are actually losing their businesses and going to jail, you don't solve the problem. Far more dangerous than "the Left." And to be clear, they are just traitors to their nation, there's nothing complicated.
But reconcile that with "muh economy."
"I was a big part of the blue wave.."
That's Lee Haight, president of RRCA (Roofing & Reconstruction Contractors of America) in Naples, Florida, defending his illegal immigrant crew from ICE and saying they're "necessary," not a burden on society.
In the same video he complains the insurance company steered jobs to his competitors, then brags about an $85,000 stone-coated steel roof on the water and a claim he says could top $150,000.
Cheap labor works out GREAT for the guy at the top. LMAO
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
I know antinomianism isn’t as hot a topic as Christian Nationalism.
But it think it’s a far more pressing issue for the church right now.
In part because God may judge a nation for the church’s lawlessness.
Antinomians are usually allergic to any reference to God’s people as “the righteous,” even though the Psalms consistently do this. Antinomians qualify this as referring to Christ’s righteousness imputed to believers.
Psalm 125 is a great refutation of such antinomianism.
It starts with those of faith (“who trust in the Lord”) and refers to them as “the righteous”—but this can’t just be Christ’s imputed righteousness because it speaks of them (in the plural) as not doing “wrong” and being “good” & “upright in heart.”
Believers still sin, but they are characterized by a life of godliness (“the righteous”), in contrast to “those who turn aside to their crooked ways.”
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
The Westminster Confession teaches that thsoe with true saving faith respond to the differing parts of the Word appropriately..."trembling at the threatenings..."
Fear of damnation is a godly motivation to obey.
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
When your girlfriend’s love language is proprietary semiconductor designs but you refuse to open up
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
users have never known what they want, don't let their asks drive everyone off the cliff
Replying to @WarrenInTheBuff
wait wait wait. is doing the opposite of what users want the meta now?
we're so back
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Replying to @MartinSkold2
Turns out your capitalists being part of the broader society and polis, who love their fellow citizens and have affectionate ties to their workers was a load bearing part of the Wealth of Nations and not Adam Smith being a fuddy duddy. You can't have an economy with sociopaths.
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Discerning people understand that Trump's honesty about his lack of holiness and struggle to forgive puts him closer to God than "devout Christians" like Ross Douthat, who by asking this very question over & over again with such contempt, reveals his own deep hatred for Trump.
🚨 Q: You're entering the next life [before God], all you have to do to enter paradise is feel love and forgiveness for James Comey, Nancy Pelosi, etc...can you do it?
TRUMP: Then I wouldn't be real, would I? The easy answer is, yes, I could forgive. They are extremely dishonest people, bad people, I love our country far more...the answer is no. I want to be honest.
Q: In judgement before God?
TRUMP: I do hate some of my enemies. Look what they put me through.
REPORTER: You had the most charmed and remarkable life of any American in my entire lifetime, and you can't find it in your heart to forgive some of your enemies?
TRUMP: All I have to do is say yes, I can. Can I be honest? I probably cannot do that. Because I do hate some of my enemies — and I always will.
Never heard Trump get asked such a deep question like that before.
He COULD just say "yes" and get out of the question, but he didn't
One thing you have to admit is this man is brutally honest.
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Your immediate reaction to God’s demand that you refrain from evil should NOT be “well that’s law, not gospel.”
Nor should it be “well Christ kept that for me.”
That is the spirit of antinomianism.
Replying to @AndrewGempton @PieterLValk
Fulfillment means completion. He completed the law. Not being under the law means that we do not have to follow the law to attain salvation, because salvation is through faith alone. The law is still in effect and the law is good.
I deserve to die for my sins. I know that.
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Replying to @TheHeroesForge
The reformers taught three uses of the law, the evangelical church abridged the doctrine to only one. Hence civilization is degenerating and sanctification has been retarded. Christian ethics have been abrogated in whole for therapy and feelz and now clicks.
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Replying to @TheHeroesForge
I call those who affirm the OT in words, but deny it in practice, "Marcionlites"
ProgrammingMadness retweeted
Antinomianism is a HUGE problem in the church today, incredibly widespread.
Yet, anyone pointing to plain truth in scripture gets spray painted with the label “legalist.”
1 Cor 6:9-10? Legalist!
Fruits of the flesh Galatians 5? Legalist!
Rev 21:8? Legalist!
The plainest passages about character and consequences? Legalist!





































