ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness) header
ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness) profile picture

Methodical not slow. Forgetful student of the incomparable value of suffering. China, Aero-Defense, Supply & Logistics,Mfgr,Competitive Advantages, Unusual POV.

USA
Joined March 2026
Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)Photo by ProgrammingMadness (@programmadness)
If this were real it would be rather dumb: like the canon makers & Ottomons—they can go elsewhere. Better have the engineers with an ally with a talented boss. @PeteHegseth @Cernovich Someone get @realDonaldTrump some real info rather than handlers. @RonDeSantis @elonmusk
Replying to @brivael
I don't think there will be any strike, but the smart Nvidia employees should right now making their plan B or plan C. The Mellanox faction of Nvidia (an Isreali company Nvidia bought in 2020 for $6.9 billion) might take over the company. Mellanox's InfiniBand is of course vital to Nvidia, but I'm afraid the new directional direction will be increasingly hostile towards China (and of course also Russia, Iran) and open source. This was possible a well-planned coup backed by some powerful AI people and CIA and Jensen fell into the trap. Now he is no longer the CEO nor even a board member in the company he founded.
1
4
Big issue of the expert deep state stuff is how reliably it is pricing wrong. Despite that there’s an office with some old dudes who always contradict, warn, prove right, get paid just to be ignored. LLMs seems like that: it won’t be reliable global rent. @pmarca @TMTLongShort
1
1
Don’t rent things that mathematical work can resolve in your tenants’ favor: expensive causes a demand/price spike that incents the whole world to shift its attn to resolve. “WeI’ll control AI” is like trying to control laws of nature.
1
Catholic apologetics is largely grounded on wish projection. The Psychology of Catholic Converts Examined youtu.be/I9ZLRYI6YQ4
Replying to @mugjudge
It's almost as if Christendom needs an authoritative institution that can definitively settle controversies that exceed the technical competence of the laity
1
1
25
682
Why is the expectation that Christ would establish an authoritative Church capable of definitively resolving doctrinal disputes necessarily wishful thinking? Isn’t it equally possible that Christ intended His Church to have that authority?
1
22
Replying to @emuse1955 @mugjudge
It would be nice to have this, definitely. Unfortunately, it demonstrably does not exist.
1
8
离他妈大谱了!个人独立开发者用 Claude 写了个开源 Linux 驱动,结果被起诉了! 索赔 2.5 万美元,每拖 7 天再加 2.5 万。 按周计价。 Vino 驱动,净室逆向工程,Rust + Claude 辅助,想推进 Linux 内核。 但被 Synaptics 指控它侵犯两项英国专利英(GB2484736、GB2485613)的指控,代码仓库已被逼到私密。 Synaptics 法务的原话:“如果你想公开,我鼓励你这么做。我们欢迎一切免费宣传。” 最无语的是,Synaptics 是 OIN 成员——一个本该保护开源开发者免遭专利诉讼的组织。
150
208
29
2,932
297,480
Patents are not copyright, cleanroom does nothing to get around a patent as a patent covers method not implementation
2
1
1,053
This is incorrect. And patents coding methods not only have been highly controversial (they’re novel) but successfully challenged more often.
I once sat in a car with a narcissist spending several minutes articulating aloud his mockery (slightly effeminate) of people who put sunglasses on as their first act in the car—he just didn’t understand why: his examples all with blue eyes & his are deep brown. It’s like that.
There’s just no way around the fact that this is the funniest video of the entire year
31
中国国内で、本当に日本に憎悪を抱き、不倶戴天の敵として皆殺しにすべきだと考える中国人は、思いのほか少ないと考える。多くの人民は、共産党の宣伝を必ずしもそのまま受け入れているわけではなく、わりと冷静に物事を見ている。また現状、中国共産党も日米との戦争には大きなリスクが伴うことを理解しており、台湾奪取はあくまで海上封鎖や政治的駆け引きのなかで実現すべきだと考えているだろう。 だが、少数派であるはずの主戦派は声が大きく粗暴である。習近平氏が率いる共産党も、弱腰だと思われるような言動をとることができない。ひとたび偶発的な衝突などが起こり、日中間に緊張状態が生まれれば、多数派であるはずの厭戦派も、その熱狂を抑え込むことができず、一気に日本討伐へと傾く可能性は十分にある。 ただ、私が恐ろしいと思うのは、多数派である厭戦派が声の大きな主戦派に圧倒されることよりも、むしろ戦争を望んでいなかった人々までが、戦争を支持する方向へと世論が動いてしまうことだ。 それは、中国では台湾統一が「核心的利益」と位置づけられ、国家の主権や領土保全、民族の復興と結びつけて人民に繰り返し“啓蒙”されていることに起因する。 「核心的利益」という言い方は胡錦濤時代の2003年頃からの比較的新しい概念だが、「台湾統一」はさらに古く1949年に中華人民共和国が建国されて以来の悲願なのだ。1990年代前半の江沢民時代からの「愛国主義(反日)」とは年季が違う。 仮に日中間で偶発的な軍事衝突が起きた場合、人民の間に「日本が中国の核心的利益に手を出した」という認識が広がる可能性がある。そこから「日本が中国の統一を妨害した」「日本は再び軍国主義化している」「中国は国家の尊厳を守らなければならない」「日本に譲歩すれば、今後も中国は侮辱され続ける」といった論理が展開され、世論が主戦論へと傾いていくことも考えられる。 この心情の変化に、必ずしも日本人への憎悪は必要ない。あくまで「核心的利益」を守るために、「戦争は嫌だ。しかし、今回ばかりは中国が引き下がるべきではない」と、軍事行動を是とする世論が形成されてしまうのだ。 日本憎しの懲罰的思考ではなく、自国の核心的利益を守るための軍事行動という愛国的思考の方が事態を急速に悪化させるのではと私は懸念している。
中国は台湾を包囲し、米国や日本が動きを見せれば、直接日本の東京を攻撃する。私は以前から何度もそう言ってきた。 これは先週実際に起きた動きだが、日本のメディアはほとんど報じていない。 中国が台湾を直接攻撃することはないと私は考えている。台湾には半導体工場が集中している。攻撃して破壊してしまったらどうするのか?あれほど莫大な利益を生み出す産業を、わざわざ壊す必要はない。 だからこそ、中国は台湾を包囲し、その一方で日本を直接攻撃する可能性がある。 これが私の判断だ。信じるかどうかはあなた次第だ。 中国軍・海警局の艦船100隻以上が西太平洋に展開。台湾側は11月3日、3つの戦区から派遣された4つの部隊が台湾とグアムの間に展開していると発表した。 中国の空母3隻のうち2隻も海上に展開。遼寧はフィリピン海、最新鋭の福建は11月2日に海南島を離れて東進。山東も海上試験に向けて動き出した。 11月2日には中国軍機49機が活動し、うち36機が台湾南方を飛行。台湾周辺では海軍艦艇や海警船による包囲態勢も続いている。 注目すべきは、今回の活動に正式な演習名も事前発表もないことだ。 さらに、パキスタンによる台湾の航空会社への領空閉鎖や、台湾周辺の海底ケーブル付近での中国調査船の活動も報告されている。 これらをつなぎ合わせると、中国が台湾を二重に包囲する構図が浮かび上がる。 100隻以上の艦船がグアム方面との間に壁を築き、空母が外側、軍用機が上空、海軍・海警船が内側を封鎖する。 米シンクタンクISWは、中国が台湾を空と海から外部と遮断する能力を示している可能性を指摘している。
153
76
6
464
130,977
So…unfortunately it’s a national brainwashing matter—starts in early schooling. Keeping alive memory/reminding “what they did!” Compare Vietnam: fought USA…now encourages people to move on & develop.
2
1
274
I grew up listening to English drastically altered by Gaelic and… What did she say?
ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT A SCOTTISH GIRLFRIEND? Mate I’m telling yous, some of yous couldnae handle it.. But I get it, our women are great 😎 #scottish #vtuber #twitch
5
We also under estimate that with men often being simply, morons, etc., an old load bearing wall was the social expectation that if you slept with the girl (whether she wanted or not), making her marriageable, her responsible male relative would somehow hurt you or…
So she says she has one of the most dedicated fathers there is, and then she says he never taught her about the nature of predatory men. Now, it is possible that both statements are true. There are several explanations. First, her father might be dedicated, but he might also be a moron. Second, he might be intelligent but so deeply immersed in feminism that he does not recognize his responsibility to teach his daughter these things. Third, he might simply be socially oblivious and fail to understand that part of his role as a father is protecting his daughter by teaching her how to recognize and avoid dangerous men. There is also the possibility that he did teach her these things, but she did not listen. And finally, perhaps he is neither as dedicated nor as good a father as she believes, but she does not know enough to recognize the difference.
3
1
1
76
Your post is kinda disjointed, with 3 self replies to your own OP.
1
1
4
Just different purposes and posts rather than one novel.
5
The New-Evangelicals, Pentecostals, & said—payer once -ers, read God’s law & think “ugh, glad I don’t have to follow all those rules!” So they have no relation to Him who gave them. Antinomians see “oh, a curse!” because they think Paul was attacking obedience itself.
The antinomians here it & emote “you’re trying to undermine the gospel”, even when you in no way think or teach that any will be justified by a futile attempt to follow the law of God. Rather, Jesus is life—His word (law/Torah) is a living father’s wisdom for His own children.
1
11
Rather than trying to be righteous on one’s own merits and works:for that Paul said bluntly,if by any works we could be justified, it would be by the works of the law.Those in Christ (genuinely) can see there plain love & consideration of He who is not only their maker, but Abba.
6
The antinomians here it & emote “you’re trying to undermine the gospel”, even when you in no way think or teach that any will be justified by a futile attempt to follow the law of God. Rather, Jesus is life—His word (law/Torah) is a living father’s wisdom for His own children.
I grew up listening to antinomians bash God’s law—as dated or shadows or eliminated, whereas you read it, it’s the most brilliant set of instructions of any concerned father you find anywhere. @NoahRevoy @Pat_Stedman @tbayly @TheHeroesForge
1
1
21
I grew up listening to antinomians bash God’s law—as dated or shadows or eliminated, whereas you read it, it’s the most brilliant set of instructions of any concerned father you find anywhere. @NoahRevoy @Pat_Stedman @tbayly @TheHeroesForge
What this did: your dad could be a nincompoop but know that if he failed to act on your loss, he lost all standing. This turned social idiots into effective walls of protection. Torah-familiar people recognize it instantly. @TheHeroesForge @Pat_Stedman @NoahRevoy @MateyYanakiev
1
1
1
131
What this did: your dad could be a nincompoop but know that if he failed to act on your loss, he lost all standing. This turned social idiots into effective walls of protection. Torah-familiar people recognize it instantly. @TheHeroesForge @Pat_Stedman @NoahRevoy @MateyYanakiev
We also under estimate that with men often being simply, morons, etc., an old load bearing wall was the social expectation that if you slept with the girl (whether she wanted or not), making her marriageable, her responsible male relative would somehow hurt you or…
1
1
140
A really good crash showing why fathers were so important in history.
unavailable
2
1
3
547
Claiming to have a rotating list of ten ranked romantic prospects is the kind of thing a crazy person does. It is likely that none of the people on her list really knew who she was or cared. She simply wrote their names down because they represented her hopes and dreams. Of course, we have to take everything she says with a grain of salt, because we are only hearing her perception of what happened. But the fact that she talks about it endlessly online is the most off-putting, ginormous red flag in the history of red flags. It is hard to imagine anything more likely to repel the very people she might want to have a relationship with.
2
7
190
I started to summarize the claimed elements in common terms and its contradictions and 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
12
Jess here really makes an interesting point unknowingly: I’ve heard “I had a good dad, I kept choosing men with [serious problem].” Not connecting to (as men discuss): REAL fatherhood was legally destroyed generations ago. @Pat_Stedman @NoahRevoy @TheHeroesForge
3
1
3
416
So she says she has one of the most dedicated fathers there is, and then she says he never taught her about the nature of predatory men. Now, it is possible that both statements are true. There are several explanations. First, her father might be dedicated, but he might also be a moron. Second, he might be intelligent but so deeply immersed in feminism that he does not recognize his responsibility to teach his daughter these things. Third, he might simply be socially oblivious and fail to understand that part of his role as a father is protecting his daughter by teaching her how to recognize and avoid dangerous men. There is also the possibility that he did teach her these things, but she did not listen. And finally, perhaps he is neither as dedicated nor as good a father as she believes, but she does not know enough to recognize the difference.
2
1
1
15
397
We also under estimate that with men often being simply, morons, etc., an old load bearing wall was the social expectation that if you slept with the girl (whether she wanted or not), making her marriageable, her responsible male relative would somehow hurt you or…
12
Building on this point: “women’s liberation/empowerment” is an architecture to enable a small cohort of powerful psychopaths (& predators more generally) to stripmine women until they’re all therapeutically unsalvageable—with no worries her father or husband can kill you.
8
be able to hold you accountable. He might kill you, in some societies drain your assets—might make you pay the bride price & decide you also couldn’t marry her. And ever in these legalistic systems where he couldn’t kill you, failing to pay meant the elders or court killed you.
14