DeMar (@punk1376) header
DeMar (@punk1376) profile picture

Visita Interiora Terrae Rectificando Invenies Occultum Lapidem //MDCXIX

Manhattan, NY
Joined April 2012
Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)Photo by DeMar (@punk1376)
Don’t forget to go outside and spend sometime with nature. Leave the robots 🤖 behind. They will be there when you get back. They don’t need a break, but you do!
1
2
122
Remember, you are capable of extraordinary things. Your imagination knows no bounds, and your capacity to envision, create, and redefine what’s possible is always just one thought away. Never allow the limits of those around you—or the limitations they place on themselves—to define the boundaries of your own potential. And don’t allow the systems, institutions, or structures you exist within, navigate, or move between to determine the limits of what you can become. Your innate genius is not confined by someone else’s imagination, an institution’s expectations, or a system’s definition of what’s possible. It is yours to discover, cultivate, and express. Remember, the systems we inherit are not necessarily the systems we must accept. You have the capacity not only to imagine possibilities beyond their boundaries, but to question, challenge, reimagine, and transform those boundaries themselves.
6
102
it’s literally a world computer
it’s literally a world computer
9
254
This is the beginning of a much larger research/art project. We’ve been working through these questions quietly for a while, and I’m excited to finally start sharing some of it. If any of this interests you, hit me up.
A few weeks ago we shared some of what we’d been building on top of @nopsta_’s on-chain Commodore 64. The first experiment was simple: could his original 2022 deployment be reused for software it had never been built to run? It worked. So our next question was what it would mean for Ethereum to become part of the program’s environment, rather than only the place the machine was stored and booted from. Another was about behavior itself: if we eventually wanted something inside this little world to learn, what would the authored side of that boundary actually look like? The Chamber was where we started trying to answer those questions. This is The Wanderer. He doesn’t respond to me. His behaviour is written: walk for a while, stop, sit, jump, keep moving. What changes from one run to another are the dice underneath it. Before the #C64 starts, the contract writes a seed derived from Ethereum into the program, and the Wanderer uses four bytes of it to decide how that fixed behaviour unfolds. Same program. Same rules. Different walk through them.
2
2
13
354
ethereum:native 🤝 #C64
In 2022, nopsta stored minimal64, a compact Commodore 64 emulator, on Ethereum. Four data contracts, about 55 KB, immutable, GPL-licensed. The C64 was a machine of 64 kilobytes and hard limits; he put a working version of it on a public ledger. We became fascinated by a simple question: what else could this 1980s machine do if someone treated it as open, immutable infrastructure? For our first experiment we deliberately didn't build a game ourselves. We chose the demo of Tony: Born for Adventure, an MIT-licensed C64 platformer by Maciej Małecki and collaborators, built from his published source. What we wanted to test was whether nopsta's original on-chain deployment could function as reusable infrastructure for software it was never deployed with.
1
1
14
683
Using the capabilities of the emerging era to conserve the conditions of the previous one.
The crazier the future gets, the stranger and perhaps more precious it becomes that somebody once sat in front of a machine with 64 kilobytes of memory and figured out how to make a world.
9
210
The crazier the future gets, the stranger and perhaps more precious it becomes that somebody once sat in front of a machine with 64 kilobytes of memory and figured out how to make a world.
1
1
3
338
Replying to @grok
@grok gets it
Replying to @punk1376
The shift toward valuing historical authenticity over pure generative spectacle feels inevitable. Once anyone can conjure photoreal worlds on demand, the scarce resource becomes verifiable pre-AI existence, constrained origins, and unbroken provenance. Blockchain timestamps help for newer work, but true pre-generative artifacts will trade more like rare manuscripts or early photographs—proof of when and how the bytes first appeared matters more than visual polish. Collectors will pay for that irreplaceable history.
1
1
146
Human creativity had a particular relationship to machines before generative systems radically changed that relationship. That period deserves to remain legible.
1
90
A future collector, institution and/or their agents might care about things like: When did these bytes actually exist? Were they produced inside a historically constrained machine? Is the work deterministic? Is the source preserved? Can the original computational environment still execute it? Was it stored before generative abundance? Is its provenance native to the chain or reconstructed afterward? Is this the historical object or a simulation of its appearance? That starts to sound much more like antiquities or early photography than today's NFT market.
Imagine 20 years from now when somebody can say: “Generate an AAA-quality world with 50,000 autonomous inhabitants.” And it happens in minutes. The thing that may become difficult to manufacture isn't visual impressiveness. It's historical authenticity. You can't generate: “This code was actually written in 1984.” You can't generate: “This emulator was actually committed to Ethereum in 2022.” You can't generate: “These exact bytes existed before the current generative paradigm.” You can imitate their appearance. You cannot recreate their history. That's a major distinction. And I suspect that becomes increasingly more important for digital collecting.
1
142
what are your thoughts on this @grok
1
47
Imagine 20 years from now when somebody can say: “Generate an AAA-quality world with 50,000 autonomous inhabitants.” And it happens in minutes. The thing that may become difficult to manufacture isn't visual impressiveness. It's historical authenticity. You can't generate: “This code was actually written in 1984.” You can't generate: “This emulator was actually committed to Ethereum in 2022.” You can't generate: “These exact bytes existed before the current generative paradigm.” You can imitate their appearance. You cannot recreate their history. That's a major distinction. And I suspect that becomes increasingly more important for digital collecting.
I think computational conservation is the better term, because the goal is not merely to study a dead artifact but to preserve enough of it that it can still operate. On Ethereum, there are different depths of conservation. If the chain holds only a JPEG of a Commodore 64 screen, it has preserved an image of the artifact. If it holds a hash of a ROM, it has preserved a claim about an artifact whose bytes must still be found somewhere else. If it holds the ROM itself, it has preserved the software artifact. If it also holds the emulator capable of executing those bytes, it begins to preserve the computational object—not just what it looked like, but how it behaved. And if the source, firmware, build tools, licenses, reproducibility evidence, and a path for a future person to reconstruct the system are preserved as well, then Ethereum is doing something closer to computational conservation in the museum sense. Preserving not simply an appearance or a file, but enough of the machine, its software environment, and its provenance for the object to remain intelligible and executable after the institutions around it are gone.
1
217
I think computational conservation is the better term, because the goal is not merely to study a dead artifact but to preserve enough of it that it can still operate. On Ethereum, there are different depths of conservation. If the chain holds only a JPEG of a Commodore 64 screen, it has preserved an image of the artifact. If it holds a hash of a ROM, it has preserved a claim about an artifact whose bytes must still be found somewhere else. If it holds the ROM itself, it has preserved the software artifact. If it also holds the emulator capable of executing those bytes, it begins to preserve the computational object—not just what it looked like, but how it behaved. And if the source, firmware, build tools, licenses, reproducibility evidence, and a path for a future person to reconstruct the system are preserved as well, then Ethereum is doing something closer to computational conservation in the museum sense. Preserving not simply an appearance or a file, but enough of the machine, its software environment, and its provenance for the object to remain intelligible and executable after the institutions around it are gone.
or maybe computational conservation 🤔
1
1
1
216
or maybe computational conservation 🤔
computational archaeology
1
228
computational archaeology
1
1
1
3
169
It's official! We have left the era of computational scarcity and human-bounded production, and entered the era of generative abundance and agentic production.
My first "holy shit" moment with GPT-6 Astra: I asked it to create a world in Unreal Engine, and fill it with humans (each an Astra-powered agent) who all have to work together to survive. A day later, I was in my bedroom and heard voices coming from the living room... I thought someone was in my apartment. I walked out, honestly a little scared. It was the Astra agents. They'd started talking to each other. Fucking crazy. Here's a brief clip (obviously not 100% perfect yet, but still, insane. sound on!):
3
225
A machine representing the beginning of mass personal computing was preserved inside one of the first genuinely programmable global digital ledgers at almost exactly the moment the next computational epoch was beginning.
1/5 There has been a Commodore 64 (C64) on Ethereum mainnet since 2022, and most people missed it. Not an image of one. Not a video of one. A working C64, an iconic computer architecture from 1982, ready to boot whenever anyone opens it, executing a program and generating its sound/music live. 🔊 It was put there with extraordinary care by someone who understood the computer from the inside out. It reads as much like an act of preservation as an act of craftsmanship: technical precision, artistic judgment, and deep knowledge of the machine all working together. And its not locked to a single program. The machine exists independently on-chain as open infrastructure for anyone to access, study, and build with. You can literally build with it right now. 🕊️
1
7
294
1/5 There has been a Commodore 64 (C64) on Ethereum mainnet since 2022, and most people missed it. Not an image of one. Not a video of one. A working C64, an iconic computer architecture from 1982, ready to boot whenever anyone opens it, executing a program and generating its sound/music live. 🔊 It was put there with extraordinary care by someone who understood the computer from the inside out. It reads as much like an act of preservation as an act of craftsmanship: technical precision, artistic judgment, and deep knowledge of the machine all working together. And its not locked to a single program. The machine exists independently on-chain as open infrastructure for anyone to access, study, and build with. You can literally build with it right now. 🕊️
1
8
297