Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph) header
Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph) profile picture

How can democratic decisions be smarter than the median voter? Beyond Arrow's paradox. Building @Anode_GG.

Text Editor, mostly
Joined January 2010
Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)Photo by Raphael Spannocchi (@raphbaph)
The true test of any organizational paradigm or collective consensus building effort is this: Does it make the whole more intelligent than the one, or less? Do people get better when interacting with the system? Or worse? It's really that simple, and that hard.
5
32
10,885
Sol is the new Luna... It is what it is.
45
What's going on with Sol 6.1? Feels like Opus 3.5 now, insanely lazy and dumb. Used to be good. That's what really sucks about closed source models. You never know what you're gonna get.
54
Crypto is very often the proverbial canary in the coalmine. We @Anode_GG are working on the frontier of on-chain decision making. What we're seeing develop before our eyes now is spectacular. Every open surface gets patted down for holes. Now, crypto being crypto, we have years of experience with living in the dark forest and have made adversarial thinking our second nature... But imagine when that happens to cuddled consumers. "I bought that box of [trusted seller], they're super diligent..." Well, as of yesterday they checked if the warranties can be cashed in. This is something entirely else. So yeah, if you have IoT devices, take them off the net, immediately.
My advice to everyone, if you have a networked smart device, rip the connectivity out of it, *now*. Unplug the ethernet, get it off the WiFI, trash it if you can’t. There’s a storm coming, and it’s going to be scary. It’s the time of reckoning for decades of IoT negligence.
50
What's quite evident in the whole Jensen saga is the complete naivetè of the employed class that it's somehow possible to run a business of any size without anything that can be construed to be bad-looking. Least of all at the size of nvidia, in a heavily regulated market with different regulations in every country and sector you touch.
64
Raphael Spannocchi retweeted
My Experience With the Leaders of the Jensen Coup At the start of 2025, numerous Washington, D.C. based NGOs began spreading the false rumor that DeepSeek smuggled 50,000 H100 GPUs. Speaking from firsthand experience, organized think tanks, PR firms, and lobbyists aggressively personally attacked anyone merely asking them to provide evidence. Call them the Export Controls Deep State, or if that’s too right-coded for you, use the Obama-administration term “Foreign Policy Blob”. The same charlatans are attempting a coup on Jensen Huang, the most indispensable CEO to America’s AI success. If we lost Sam, we have Dario. If we lost Dario, we have Demis. Nvidia is singular. The gap between Nvidia and AMD would be wider than the gap between OpenAI and Mistral, Europe’s top AI company whose models don’t rank in the top 40. This is an attempt to derail the most important company for the American AI industry. The entire coup against Jensen Huang can be halted by asking a single question. What evidence is there that Alice Huang is actually a Chinese spy? The answer, unsurprisingly, is absolutely zero. There is not even the pretense of a factual basis for the claim. “We made it the fuck up, and if you have a problem with that, what are you, pro-China?” Taking away this obvious falsehood, the coup against Jensen boils down to a celebrity tabloid headline. Moreover, without the entirely fabricated ‘national security relevance’, these tabloid headlines would be at best a weekend story in the New York Post. Another basic question: if there is evidence of ‘national security relevance’, why not charge Jensen? The basic answer: they lack even the evidence to justify a warrant. During my time in DC, I was advised repeatedly to stay on the good side of the Export Controls Deep State. I was added to many groups for boosting content spreading the 50,000 H100s conspiracy theory. In several groups, I asked whether there was any evidence behind this claim. One group administrator, who was and still is affiliated with Georgetown, explicitly told me to “focus on bolstering the narrative”. I later posted Patel’s pseudo-correction and was subsequently removed from all of these groups. What you need to understand about the Export Controls Deep State is that they have no incentive to be remotely honest, because they are entirely unaccountable. To this day, they provided zero evidence for their claim. Internet historians later traced the origin of this claim to a tweet by Dylan Patel of Semianalysis. Patel later said they lied about his tweet and that his claim counted legally obtained hardware. Affiliates of universities and think tanks promote these baseless claims and are taken seriously by the national press. In reality, their theories about Nvidia are as kooky as the guy who shot up Comet Pizza. The reason they succeed is not only because they are unaccountable, but because they constantly use their unaccountability to attack others. There are broader foreign policy implications to these observations about political power, but I will stick to what I witnessed firsthand. After Trump’s election, his administration began lifting the export control cap. Surprising no one informed about this policy, America widened our lead. Deepseek was closest to catching up to American models in January 2025, literally the moment of peak export controls. Based on communication with members of the administration, the evidence that a) the export controls were net negative and b) the export controls deep state was acting in bad faith, that as soon as the situation was described accurately, the administration began rolling them back. Part of this is because many of these NGOs are funded by foundations like Open Philanthropy / Coefficient Giving, who explicitly intend to harm American AI companies because they believe American AI will “cause human extinction”. As a result, the BIS under the Biden administration was used as an informal cudgel against AI companies, both to censor in favor of their worldview, as seen in the Gemini scandal, as well as to backdoor regulation to slow down American AI broadly. While they love to accuse everyone else of being traitors, the Export Controls Deep State makes Americans poorer and the American military, to the extent they use AI, weaker. Most of the time, the best you can do is ignore them. They really are unaccountable and the personal retribution isn’t worth the cost. But now, they are leading a coup against the AI industry’s most indispensable man based on lies and tabloid gossip. Everyone should understand that the Export Controls Deep State has never provided any evidence for their claims nor any reason for their word to be trusted.
143
487
122
3,206
419,500
Raphael Spannocchi retweeted
You can read Jensen Huang's cogent explanations for why he thinks the U.S. should sell high-end semiconductors to China at length. There is no secrecy about it, he just has a view of the technology and its future development and potential different to that of the frontier labs.
Replying to @SamoBurja
But the combination of this security breach and his lobbying for sales to China really does make it a national security issue. I’m not a China Hawk *at all* but if we’re serious about national security we can’t just accept things like this.
14
35
9
375
85,802
Raphael Spannocchi retweeted
So I looked into these allegations that Jensen had a romantic relationship with a Chinese spy and, ironically, the only actual proof we have that someone is whoring themselves out to spies in this story is the media - all the rest is unsubstantiated, just journalists repeating what anonymous US intelligence officials told them. I'm not exaggerating, I actually read all the key articles on this: 1) New York Times on Oct 29, the initial "scoop": nytimes.com/2026/10/29/us/po… Claim: Alice Huang is a Chinese intelligence asset funneling information to Beijing. "Proof": they were told so by "people briefed on the surveillance, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the findings are drawn from classified intelligence..." That’s it. The Times even admits it couldn’t determine which agency monitored her, what she passed along, or its value to China. In other words, they didn't verify the spy claim whatsoever. 2) Wall Street Journal on Oct 30: wsj.com/tech/chinese-executi… Claim: The US, Singapore and Taiwan suspect Alice Huang is a Chinese intelligence source, with Singapore and Taiwan even putting physical surveillance teams on her. "Proof": "people familiar with the matter said." That’s it. And the story actually fell apart within a day since Singapore’s Home Affairs ministry went on the record with a public rebuke of the WSJ article (mha.gov.sg/media-room/newsro…) stating that "neither the Singapore Government nor its officials said this," and that "there were no such investigations conducted in respect of Alice Huang." Taiwan declined to comment. In other words, the only government they invoked that went on the record denied the claim publicly. 3) New York Times again on Nov 6, the "MSS recruit" story: nytimes.com/2026/11/06/us/po… Claim: Alice Huang was recruited by China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) specifically to collect intelligence on Jensen. "Proof": "according to people briefed on U.S. surveillance." That’s it. No new evidence, no document, no on-record source for the claim. Yet the headline states it as plain fact, without even an "allegedly." 4) The Financial Times, quoted below, on Nov 7 with the romance claim: ft.com/content/a55a2a22-4479… Claim: A US government memo says Jensen had a romantic relationship with Alice Huang. "Proof": "said people familiar with the memo." That’s it: anonymous people describing a memo the FT never saw, which itself describes intelligence nobody can check. --- It's properly extraordinary when you think about it and you couldn't make it up: she’s accused of being an intelligence asset, yet the only people we can actually watch behaving as intelligence assets - and admitting so in writing (since they openly cite spies as their only source) - are Western journalists. Things are so bad that we've forgotten what actual journalism is: real journalists - when anonymous intelligence officials tell them something - would treat it as a lead to investigate, not as a fact. They'd ask: why are they leaking this, why now, and who benefits? And, most importantly, they’d try to verify the claims independently before printing them - which is supposed to be journalism 101 and wasn't done here. You'd think something would have been learned from the Iraq WMD story and the countless other examples of the press laundering intelligence claims into front-page "facts." Apparently not - and it’s even the same newspaper, the New York Times, leading the charge.
160
377
79
1,999
379,072
could argue that the current governments of the west are both to big and bloated and too weak to enforce corps doing the right things. Of course this is by design. Bloated government means less accountability, more perks, more control.
I’m a free-market capitalist of the Milton Friedman school. But companies exploiting profit-shifting loopholes undermine both capitalism and democracy. They leave everyone else to foot the bill, then wonder why public trust collapses. Corporate irresponsibility hands capitalism’s enemies their best ammunition.
2
116
love this let's not become timber
Chinese proverb: An unconventionally bent tree lives its own life. A conventional tree becomes timber.
1
2
162
Re data center bans. When you equate your product to nuclear weapons and young and gullible people with large audiences parrot that across the globe you will have a very hard time getting permits for your factories. No one wants a nuke factory in their backyard.
2
163
Raphael Spannocchi retweeted
In the future, 90% of your tokens usage will be through local models, the rest will be proxied via ODS to frontier models with stateless information about your intellectual property The hybrid AI approach will win
43
30
6
576
16,892
Okay. Agentic commerce is not a thing (yet?) ht Buko Capital xitter.twitterapi.xyz/buccocapital/status/21…
2
1
178
Something I have been arguing since 2022: Decentralization or not is an issue of control. If the control is fluid and can credibly change, or if it is dispersed enough, you're decentralized. If everyone is hanging on the founder's lips before proposing anything, you aren't. If your project is thinking about this, talk to us @Anode_GG
The SEC’s updated governance token FAQ says unaffiliated token holders who vote without an agreement, arrangement or delegation to act together generally are not a “Central Party.” Even if holders are considered a group, they must actually hold operational, economic or voting control. The SEC staff describes that as unilateral power to control protocol access, validators, code, transactions or user access. The guidance is staff interpretation only, not a Commission rule or legally binding classification of any token. Why it matters: The update reduces one source of uncertainty for DAO governance models by indicating that dispersed collective voting alone does not necessarily show centralized control. Read the full article: coincamps.ai/article/n6416
2
158
The number of governance attacks, we @Anode_GG are seeing currently is just astounding. Like factor 20x of what they were 12 months ago. Usually on smaller DAOs where buying enough voting power to have a fighting chance of passing a proposal is cheap. The economics check out. Buy low four to low five digits of a token, usually 4-10x quorum, and then try to sneak a malicious proposal through. The upside is 10x of capital deployed in most cases, and worst case for the attacker is they sell the tokens again at a small loss... If you're a DAO you need on-chain monitoring. You need a guardian msig or a similar mechanism to stop attackers. And you need competent governance people. Just work with Anode!
1
6
183
Raphael Spannocchi retweeted
We're delighted to share Making Treasury ETH Productive: a data-driven look at the state of ETH treasuries By @Kairos_Res, in collaboration with @golemfoundation & @ethereuminsti
29
56
34
237
35,733
I feel there are soo many similarities between the AI and the crypto market. User incentives (subsidies, resets), grants, etc. Also currently the "fat protocol thesis" seems to sway AI investors (everything accrues at the model) While we know... Apps, Apps, Apps
1
8
218
Damn @bot is such a great product... Reaching for Hermes less and less. I don't love that, but it is what it is.
59
Raphael Spannocchi retweeted
I’m looking for work. Now my résumé is accepting sponsors. Founding sponsors: @reserveprotocol (the company that laid me off 🥲) @partyactionppl, and @asimov_co 5 spots left, 3 tiers. Your company’s logo in front of every hiring manager I contact starl3xx.fun/resume
58
27
15
185
109,456
What's going on at apple? New window controls look very weird, washed out...
1
1
178
Binance TOP50 are down more than 90% since Jan 2024! Well well...
1
90