But you put anyone else from the white team or really the tournament in the spots duke was after Marissa they also save 2-3 shots…you can’t expect Marissa to make every shot, no one out there did. But I do see your point.
20
Replying to @PlayWLS
I don't think this outrage is directed AT the Duke but more the circumstance that the Duke got put in. It wasn't his fault he made the final, but once it was determined he would, the powers that be should've stepped in and figured something out.
1
3
990
Replying to @cpgjosh @Internetinvite
It's mainly because it happened to arguably the two nicest people in the event. Had it happened to anyone else, I don't think the outrage is as aggressive as it is. Ruff wasn't going to argue more than he did against Dave in the draft, anyone else would have thrown a fit.
1
1
240
Replying to @MattDeLuca
I disagree. Just because she didn't play her best does not matter. You cannot overcome the fact that The Duke has to hit every third shot. No team in that final overcomes that. He was an extreme liability that should have been replaced in this scenario.
2
1
1,265
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not go for D. Jones. May be a great guy and player but I dont think it is the right fit...I dont want a "for rent" guy, I want a QB that'll last for a bit. Only acceptable choice is sell the farm (in picks) for Herbert.
531
Replying to @stoolpresidente
Dave, I have loved your content/business back to the Milton days, BUT, you cannot say, with a straight face and clean conscience that ANY of those teams would have moved on with the Duke, or that he wasn't an extreme liability.
1
1,529
Replying to @Internetinvite
The trajectory of this invitational was absolutely destroyed by allowing the duke to play when so much money was on the line. He should have been replaced via a playoff with the 4 worst handicaps… or something. Poor Marissa and Ruff…it should be replayed honestly…
8
607
Replying to @Internetinvite
The duke scenario was such a poor decision. He should have been replaced via a playoff with the 4 worst handicaps or something. He was an auto loss for whoever got him on their team. Absolute travesty it played out how it did…
1
26
Replying to @stoolpresidente @Internetinvite
The duke should have been replaced when it was decided he would make it…that was an auto loss for whatever team he got put on…or it should’ve been Micah and Ruffles with the duke or something like that…having him on a team hurt the integrity of that round…
31
3,013
Replying to @winter_bradl
Absolutely, that ruined that episode…honestly they should have replaced him for the final rounds. Dave could’ve made that call and he could’ve been like a coach or something for the team…but to essentially automatically make two people lose on his team was so wrong
2
16
1,209
Replying to @PlayWLS
Honestly, they Dave should’ve made a ruling that he was out in this round. He is so bad. I feel so bad for the rest of his team. He’s got good vibes but with 1.3 on the line? He’s got to go…
1
2
653
Replying to @dollarsanddata
Agreed, you dont deserve ANY of the frustration from people, you are just presenting the data, "dont shoot the messenger" applies here. But, you still can air out your frustrations/comments to the messenger haha.
1
127
Replying to @alphacharts365
Why? Retirement accounts are what every economic talking head points to as a very important part of your monthly savings. So why turn around and say, "but you cant count it towards your net worth"?? Huh??
1
64
Replying to @dollarsanddata
I know you’ve addressed this in the comments, and it’s not your fault; but why are people so obssessed nowadays with not including retirement in the net worth? The entire economic community recommends saving for retirement but then turns around and says, “but wait you can’t consider it in your net worth”…..huh?!
2
4
618
