Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley) header
Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley) profile picture

Author w/Hussein Agha, TOMORROW IS YESTERDAY: LIFE, DEATH, & THE PURSUIT OF PEACE IN ISRAEL-PALESTINE. Pdt Emeritus & Mideast Pg Dir @CrisisGroup. Yale Lecturer

Joined October 2011
Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)Photo by Robert Malley (@Rob_Malley)
Robert Malley retweeted
The "third way" between a deal and more bombing brings the fewest near-term negative consequences: Trump avoids the market reaction that comes with another round of fighting and the political hit of making a deal with Iran. But the third way isn't really a way at all--Iran is likely to either resist the pressure or lash out more aggressively. axios.com/2026/11/10/trump-i…
11
24
4
91
31,509
« The absence of an immediate war should not be mistaken for de-escalation. As long as the blockade remains in place without a credible diplomatic exit, the risk of another military confrontation will remain real. »
Trump’s Message on Iran: The Gulf Wants No War, but the Status Quo Is Unsustainable One thing stands out from Trump’s latest post: Gulf states clearly oppose another military confrontation with Iran. I suspect this was the central message conveyed during the meeting itself, as well as in conversations between senior U.S. officials and their Gulf counterparts. There is a growing and welcome recognition across the Gulf that another war would not serve the interests of these countries. Quite the opposite. They would be among the first to pay the price, particularly if Iran retaliated against energy infrastructure, shipping routes, and other strategic assets. But the real question is whether the meeting produced a new diplomatic proposal, and more importantly, whether Washington is showing any genuine flexibility. Because one thing should be clear: the current status quo cannot last. Iran is unlikely to accept an indefinite blockade. Tehran could respond by targeting additional tankers and raising the economic and military costs of maintaining it. At the same time, once the new Congress takes office, the administration could face growing pressure to reconsider a blockade that has failed to produce Iranian capitulation while imposing significant costs on the global economy. And there is a fundamental problem with Washington's approach: a blockade is a means of applying pressure, not an end in itself. If Tehran refuses to surrender, what exactly is the next step? To conclude, Gulf states want to avoid escalation, and Trump increasingly appears inclined in the same direction. But preferences are not policy, and diplomatic statements are not a diplomatic breakthrough. Unless Washington and Tehran find a formula that allows both sides to claim some degree of success, the situation will remain dangerously unstable. The absence of an immediate war should not be mistaken for de-escalation. As long as the blockade remains in place without a credible diplomatic exit, the risk of another military confrontation will remain real. #Iran #IranWar
15
4
38
6,381
Robert Malley retweeted
🔔🔔 DEMANDEZ LE PROGRAMME 🔔🔔 🔗 youtube.com/watch?v=H_1z-FMs… Demain matin dès 7H30, retrouvez Clémence @Houdiakova et toute son équipe pour une matinale sans concession sur l’actualité ! Au menu : 🚀 L’ombre d’Epstein sur les midterms ! 🔸Marc Gabriel Draghi @gabriel_draghi Juriste spécialisé dans l’histoire du droit Auteur de « Le Grand Reset en marche ! », « La Grande narration » et « CBDC : une monnaie pour asservir l’humanité », Ka’éditions 🚀 Midterms : le bilan ! 🔸Renaud Beauchard @rbeauchard Avocat Chroniqueur Tocsin, fondateur du podcast « Tout le monde sait » Fondateur du Substack « Les chroniques Egregoriennes » Membre du Brownstone Institute 🚀 Le nouveau Yalta sans l’Europe ! 🔸Georges Renard-Kuzmanovic @Vukuzman Directeur de la publication et rédacteur en chef de Fréquence Populaire @FPopMedia Analyste géopolitique, ancien officier de l’armée française et ancien humanitaire 🔸David Teurtrie Directeur de l’Observatoire français des BRICS Maître de conférences en science politique à l’ICES Chercheur associé au CREE de l’INALCO 🚀 La chronique d’AuBonTouite @VictorSinclair3 🔸Humoriste officiel de la complosphère 🚀 Midterms : Benjamin Netanyahu rendu responsable de la chute de Trump ! 🔸Robert Malley @Rob_Malley Ancien diplomate américain, spécialiste du Moyen-Orient, de l’Iran et du conflit israélo-palestinien Ancien envoyé spécial des États-Unis pour l’Iran sous Joe Biden Auteur de « Demain, c’est hier : Vie, mort et quête de la paix en Israël/Palestine », éd. Max Milo @MaxMiloEditions 🚀 Les Films à l’arrache et Tocsin : une soirée caritative le 14 décembre ! 🔸Thomas Séraphine Comédien Chroniqueur Tocsin Pour vous inscrire : soutien.lesfilmsalarrache.co… Soutenez-nous, faites un don à Tocsin : tocsin-media.fr/nous
3
6
14
2,716
Robert Malley retweeted
These 2005 vintage arguments don’t work any more. This is an unnecessary, illegal, globally destructive war launched without Congressional authorization and overwhelmingly rejected by American voters Tuesday. Democrats should use every tool they have to defund and end it.
6
68
367
8,895
Robert Malley retweeted
Democrats Shouldn’t Squander Their Chance to Launch a Foreign Policy Revolution My piece in @ForeignAffairs calling on Democrats to seize this moment. foreignaffairs.com/united-st…
12
60
11
193
42,510
Robert Malley retweeted
"If we can block [war funding] sooner [than 2027], let's block it sooner" Senator-elect @AbdulElSayed on Iran funding debate "This war is illegal, it's unjustifiable... we've gotta explore all the mechanisms that we can to force an end to the war" with @davidsirota @LeverNews
“I’m not planning to vote for anything that provides any funding to fuel the war in Iran. If the president wants to tell the country that he’s prepared to shut down the United States government in order to conduct an illegal and senseless war in Iran, that will be his choice.”
1
16
1
54
2,420
One way to end the war they say they want to end: “Support a continuing resolution prohibiting the financing of any combat activities of the U.S. military in Iran. End the Iran war like we did for Vietnam.”
I agree that the reason Republicans lost is the Iran war. I would add the corruption epitomized by the Epstein cover up. Here is what I propose: 1. Support a continuing resolution prohibiting the financing of any combat activities of the U.S. military in Iran. End the Iran war like we did for Vietnam. 2. Support the zeroing out of all aid to Israel in the continuing resolution. 3. Support Massie and my Epstein 2.0 Act to allow state attorney generals to prosecute the pedophiles who abused and trafficked young girls. Will you actually now do any of these three things?
42
3
161
20,229
Robert Malley retweeted
This is a remarkable post from VP @JDVance
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
75
86
3
1,581
738,258
Robert Malley retweeted
Extraordinary admission from JD Vance: The Iran war cost Republicans the election. He says Trump voters defected to Democrats, with ending the war their #1 demand and changing US relations with Israel among their top four. The political reckoning over this war has begun.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
5
41
1
143
7,066
Robert Malley retweeted
Told @AJEnglish that the sense of victory being displayed by Iranian decision-makers will likely make them more uncompromising on core demands. Those include seven conditions set for the partial reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, as well as a requirement for the US to take the first step. The likelihood of Iran making concessions on the nuclear issue could also become even lower than before. aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/…
47
8
153
52,722
Robert Malley retweeted
The right policy is good politics. Democrats shouldn't vote for another dollar for this illegal, disastrous and inhumane war.
National GOP operative tells me: "People will try to overcomplicate this, but its really simple: This is 100% because of Iran. It's all in the data and has been since a week after the war started. The economic anxiety is directly correlated with the war. We got our asses kicked because of it."
14
120
1
1,148
36,957
A significant ramification of tonight’s election. As @Rob_Malley and I wrote in June, what future American president is going to want to attack Iran? nytimes.com/2026/06/23/opini…
Hearing lots of anger from inside Trump’s orbit about how GOP is getting killed over the Iran war, including this from one source close to White House: “If any good comes out of tonight for the Republican Party, it’s that no Republican president will ever listen to imbeciles like Mark Levin and Marc Thiessen again”
1
3
15
4,503
Robert Malley retweeted
Midnight Hammer was completely unnecessary and blatantly illegal, it recklessly interrupted what could’ve been fruitful negotiations and put us directly on path to the current war. Democrats need to be done with this stuff.
Dan that’s nonsense. Midnight Hammer was necessary and appropriate, but Iran was not anything like two weeks from a nuclear weapon on February 28.
7
76
1
345
12,242
Robert Malley retweeted
Just 10 minutes to wrap up the 4-5 week excursion that began more than 8 months ago against a nuclear program that was obliterated last year.
Trump on Iran: We still have to take care of, I would say, one or two sites, but we can do that in 10 minutes. Ten minutes. So we have that plan.
34
1
179
10,152
Someone asked me recently why it’s so hard for the US to choose a more constructive approach towards Iran and to break the cycle of sanctions and war. I said that it’s not really about choices. The alternative way of doing things is rarely even considered. Government is a machine, the gears are whirring, and there is an inertia that prevents those gears from stopping, let alone from changing direction. This account from @brhodes explains what that inertia looks like. It’s something mundane and bureaucratic, and in its worst moments, it verges towards the “banality of evil.”
8
63
6
241
24,891
Guy that is arguing he will end a civilization, bridges, and power plants if he doesn't get what he wants
Marco Rubio on Iran: The Iranian regime is basically arguing that, "Unless we get what we want, we will destroy the energy infrastructure of the entire region." Just think about that. That's not normal behavior.
7
36
339
7,577
Entretien avec @Rob_Malley pour le @Cercle_Aristote. Ce fut un grand honneur pour moi. L’un des grands entretiens les plus marquants depuis le début de cette aventure. youtu.be/FLW1rLZ8zw4
1
16
55
4,526
Robert Malley retweeted
This from @brhodes is probably the best description of how the Democratic foreign policy elite has gone about the mundane perpetuation of US power in the post-Obama era.
51
275
36
1,544
231,425
“Ultimately, we are defined both by the choices we make and by the choices we don’t make, not by the versions of ourselves that live in our heads. The aide who told Ahmed that the killing in Rafah “slowed and it was not just because there was nobody left to kill” probably believed what he was saying. That is how you rationalize participation in a system that should be untenable.” From @brhodes’ review of Crossing the Redline nybooks.com/articles/2026/11…
61
2
197
75,535
Robert Malley retweeted
For a primer on why Israel's "generous offers" to Palestinians weren't in fact generous, see @Rob_Malley's excellent book TOMORROW IS YESTERDAY amazon.com/Tomorrow-Yesterda…
Replying to @shadihamid
It’s worth remembering that the contemporary Israeli state has engaged in multiple rounds of diplomacy over the decades with the Palestinians, including agreeing to the creation of the PA, and has concluded peace treaties with half a dozen more. There is a deep problem in the failure to get to peace. But it’s not Israel’s alone. Arguing that is deeply disingenuous.
25
15
3
78
10,192