Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of nearly 260,000 volunteers.
It is the largest and most-read reference work in history, and is consistently ranked among the ten most visited websites.
Wikipedia is available in more than 300 languages, which together comprise over 63 million articles and attract more than 15 billion views every month.
Wikipedia content is also available on social media:
➡️ Instagram: instagram.com/wikipedia
➡️ TikTok: tiktok.com/@wikipedia
➡️ Bluesky: bsky.app/profile/wikipedia.o…
➡️ Threads: threads.net/@wikipedia
➡️ Facebook: facebook.com/wikipedia
➡️ YouTube: youtube.com/wikipedia
➡️ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/wikiped…
Feb 10, 2025 · 1:34 PM UTC
You should stop asking for donations until you have cleaned up the site. You know perfectly well - since multiple people have told you multiple times - that Wikipedia has not been a source of information on any controversial topic for years. It is a vehicle of propaganda, sustained as such by a small team of fanatical activist editors who have completely destroyed what was once a great site.
Happily @Grokipedia has arrived.
It’s much better.
Is anyone still active on the @Wikipedia admin team? I wanted to get in touch to set up a donations token.
11
24
4,571
Ball is in your court, Dickipedia.
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/Johnmc42069/status/189…
Funding forever.
WHAT?! 😳😱
@Wikipedia placed a one year moratorium barring changes to the description of Zionism on its Wikipedia page:
“Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible.”
7
53
7,669
Did you know this about @Wikipedia and how their censorship and libtarded "slant" actually works.? Have you been "blacklisted"?
Listen 😳
I know Wikipedia was trash, but I just didn’t realize how low you would go. This is next level evil. Change your name to Wikishit or Dickipedia
cc: @elonmusk
@Grokipedia
Wikipedia is curated propaganda
Wikipedia’s editors are helping Iran rewrite history
The Free Press finds “Wikipedia's entry on Ali Khamenei is a masterclass in narrative framing. The all-important opening section of the article makes no mention of the fact that Khamenei's regime was responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of its own citizens in mass crackdowns.
Instead, readers are introduced to something far more anodyne. He's described as a pragmatic hardliner, and his status as a religious authority is foregrounded. Violent uprisings against his rule are softened into the phrase faced many protests, images to alleged crimes against humanity appear later, and even then, they're framed cautiously attributed to what critics say, rather than presented as established historical claims or legal findings.”
“A 2024 investigation by the times reported that entries related to Iran have been repeatedly revised in ways that minimize or contextualize state violence.“
“While Iranian security forces killed thousands of protesters in repeated waves of unrest with the real toll, often obscured by internet blackouts that prevent documentation, another battle has been taking place in the digital realm. Editors sympathetic to the regime or aligned with its perspective have worked to shape how these events are recorded on widely used platforms. Like Wikipedia, the strategy is two-fold. Physical repression constrains, dissent at home, while informational influence shapes understanding abroad. Together, they form what Khamenei himself is described as a kind of soft war in the information space.”1
“A campaign to control interpretation as much as territory. Investigations into Wikipedia, editing suggest this effort has been sustained and coordinated over time.”
This is the most egregious and ignorant action Wikipedia could take, and you allowed it to happen.
Hopefully you will be sued out of business. I’m disgusted for having ever donated to you in the past.
My latest on @Wikipedia in @JewishJournal: 🧵
Wikipedia editors decided to place a one-year moratorium barring anyone from editing or discussing the controversial sentence in the lead of the Zionism Wikipedia page: “Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible.”
So glad for this topic because leftist Wiki editors can't keep removing my fact-based, well sourced contributions (and even Talk!) because they don't like how they refute their narratives. CV origins and the 2020 election are two recent topics.
If I were associated with that site I'd be embarrassed. They appear not to be embarrassed, but even more zealous.
Biggest amplifier of misinformation on the internet and everyone knows it.
If anyone tries to fix a provably false "fact", along comes the hostile Nerd Army of WikiMonitors to Keep It Wrong.
Dying by every reasonable measure.
@wokbonds
2
18
657
restore, "DEFUSE" 🔬
xitter.twitterapi.xyz/i/status/2081902573934…
Wikipedia has now removed DEFUSE from its article on the origins of Covid. Even by Wikipedia’s grotesquely corrupt standards, that is an extraordinary act of historical vandalism. It's like writing about 9/11 while omitting the planes.
(DEFUSE is the 2018 blueprint developed by Peter Daszak and his Wuhan lab collaborators for engineering the exact same kinds of coronavirus features that later appeared in Covid. It is the smokingest of smoking guns.)
1
11
🫧
🕊️🌿🫧🧬🫧🧬🌿🕊️
@Wikipedia and @Grokipedia Entry: Heurekamus and Homo hominis ursus est
Heurekamus
Heurekamus is a neologism coined by Swiss writer and activist Iduna Lächelnd (also associated with Irène Heinrich). It is formed from the Greek heureka (εὕρηκα, “I have found it”) and the Latin mus (“we”), yielding the meaning “we have found it.”
The term is presented as a collective alternative to the traditional singular interjection Heureka (or English eureka), associated with Archimedes. According to its originator, the singular form was incomplete or incorrect because genuine discovery is communal. Lächelnd links the word to an international group’s demonstration that “mind is all ~ All is mind.”
Heurekamus has been promoted since 2025 primarily through posts on X (Twitter) under the account @IdunaLaechelnd and self-published pieces attributed to “The New Horizon Times.” It is framed as an expression of shared insight, collaboration, and intercultural peace.
As of 2026 the term remains a self-published neologism with no independent lexicographical recognition or significant secondary coverage.
Homo hominis ursus est
Homo hominis ursus est (“man is a bear to man”) is a Latin expression coined or popularized by Swiss writer Iduna Lächelnd (also associated with Irène Heinrich). It is offered as a reformulation of the classical proverb Homo homini lupus est (“man is a wolf to man,” from Plautus).
In the author’s interpretation the bear (ursus) symbolizes strength, spirit, and mutual inspiration, corresponding to the idea that “Human without spirit is no human” and that “human is inspirator for human.” Lächelnd has dated the phrase in her work to at least 2018 (under the signature IdunaheArts / Wellenlyrik) and has shared it repeatedly on X since 2024–2025.
The expression appears exclusively in the originator’s social-media posts and related self-published material. It has not achieved independent attestation or wider adoption as of 2026.
1
7
