emilio andere (@gpuemi) header
emilio andere (@gpuemi) profile picture

cofounder/ceo @wafer_ai. math @uchicago

san francisco
Joined December 2015
Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)Photo by emilio andere (@gpuemi)
emilio andere retweeted
Dark, dark day. Horrible decision for the U.S. and the western world.
106
194
35
3,847
381,126
emilio andere retweeted
Microscopy lets scientists literally see the biological world. We think giving agents the same ability will be an important source of progress in science. Today we introduce TissueMicroscopyBench, our first release in a new microscopy series covering tissues, cells, and in vitro systems. The benchmark comprises 49 evaluations built from four public imaging datasets. Agents must locate structures, trace their boundaries, reason through three-dimensional images, and follow changes over time. Some of the work: - Colorectal cancer sections stained with H&E and multiplexed immunofluorescence. Tasks include outlining mucosa, fat, and nerves, and locating evidence of tumor invasion. - Liver metastasis biopsies taken before and after treatment. Agents compare tumor compartments, PD-L1 staining, and T-cell-rich regions across the images. - Light-sheet recordings of living organoids. Overlapping structures and densely packed nuclei require agents to distinguish individual objects and draw their boundaries. - A regenerating leg recorded in three dimensions over time. Tasks examine the injury site, local cell divisions, tissue retraction, and the sequence of regeneration. Compared with our previous benchmarks, these evals are especially visually striking. The rollouts are dense, interleaving image manipulation (including hand-rolled segmentation and CV in Python) with reasoning. Some slides contain billions of pixels. Agents have to decide where to look, examine the relevant regions at sufficient resolution, and return precise outlines, tracks, or volumes. These are scored against expert annotations. Every task was also solved independently by a human as a check on task quality. We tested 22 models in 30 model–harness configurations, with three attempts per task. Claude Fable 5.2 (LSVP) with Pi had the highest pass rate at 34.0%, passing 50 of 147 attempts. Timeouts and invalid answers counted as failures. Twenty-three of the 49 tasks were never solved by any configuration. We found that agents can be shockingly bad at localization, often finding the general region of interest but drawing boundaries that included surrounding tissue or random patches of empty space. Small structures and changes across time were particularly difficult. We think visual perception and spatial reasoning will become core capabilities for scientific agents. It’s also just a super fun space to think creatively about evals (h/t Ian Diks). Excited to release more in this series and watch agents improve here. - Blog: blog.latch.bio/p/tissue-micr… - GitHub: github.com/latchbio/tissuemi… - Leaderboard: benchmarks.bio/tissuemicrosc…
2
8
619
emilio andere retweeted
We’re expanding our benchmark efforts into basic research. Today we introduce NeuroscienceBench, the first release in a new series, with immunology, aging, and other core fields to follow. The goal is to measure whether AI agents can analyze experimental data and reach reliable conclusions about how biology works. We’re starting with neuroscience, where interpreting neural recordings, microscopy images, and animal behavior requires both analytical skill and scientific judgment. NeuroscienceBench comprises 91 evaluations drawn from 43 peer-reviewed studies, spanning sequencing, electrophysiology, EEG, brain–computer interface decoding, imaging, behavior, and clinical biomarkers. Agents analyze experimental data and return structured answers that are graded deterministically. Three public examples: - Neural recordings from the intertrigeminal nucleus. The analysis compares a narrow- and broad-spiking classification derived from the region’s own recordings with the conventional 0.40 ms spike-duration cutoff. - Digital tracings of Lamp5 Lsp1 interneurons from mouse visual cortex. Their cell bodies sit at different cortical depths, and different fractions of their axons reach the outermost cortical layer. The analysis examines whether depth alone accounts for that variation. - A mouse reaching through a narrow slot toward a food pellet. The video contains a pellet and a reflective paw marker with known dimensions, providing possible references for measuring movement in millimeters. We tested 21 models in 34 model–harness configurations, with three attempts per evaluation and no internet access. After excluding platform failures and refusals, 9,212 graded attempts remained. Claude Opus 5.5 with Pi had the highest observed pass rate at 32.2%. The mean across configurations was 21.0%. Across models, evaluations involving quality control, controls, or artifacts averaged a 10.6% pass rate. Those involving normalization or representation choices averaged 12.6%. Reliable neuroscience agents will need to make these decisions correctly across the many types of data scientists work with. Paper: latch.bio/neurobench Leaderboard: benchmarks.bio/neuroscience Blog: blog.latch.bio/p/neuroscienc… GitHub: github.com/latchbio/neuroben… Incredible work from @Jack_Brougher, Anshika Agrawal, @tpr720, Martin Jacko, and team.
14
22
2
84
5,028
emilio andere retweeted
Rare diseases collectively affect an estimated 300 million people worldwide. For patients and families, reaching a diagnosis can take years of referrals and testing. One place AI agents could help is in interpreting each new sequencing result or functional assay alongside the patient’s symptoms, family history, and earlier findings. We introduce RareDiseaseBench, a benchmark of 35 diagnostic workups reconstructed from published rare disease cases. Each agent starts with the patient’s presentation and part of the medical record. Over one or more visits, it must decide which tests to request, explain why, analyze the files it receives, and propose a diagnosis and management plan. Five cases from the benchmark: - A 13-year-old boy has growth restriction, hearing loss, and severe chilblains. An MN1 variant explains several developmental findings. Long-read sequencing reveals a translocation disrupting SAMHD1 that accounts for his inflammatory symptoms. - A 21-year-old man has heterotaxy with right atrial isomerism. A variant just beyond the standard ZIC3 transcript falls within an intron of an alternative transcript, causing 57 extra bases to be spliced into the RNA. - A boy develops progressive scalp hair loss while his eyebrows and body hair are preserved. A scalp biopsy shows miniaturized follicles, and sequencing reveals a 357-kb duplication spanning TAB3 and neighboring genes. - A 16-year-old boy with typical growth has a language disorder, learning disability, and autism. He carries two inherited variants in RNU2-2, a small nuclear RNA gene outside the coverage of his exome sequencing. - A boy with delayed motor milestones and enlarged calves has a creatine kinase level of 10,100 U/L. At a second visit, an outside lab reports a DMD inversion. Targeted long reads show duplicated segments containing exons 1 and 2 joined head to head. Each configuration made three attempts on each of the 35 cases. Gemini 4 Argon with Pi passed 46 of 105 attempts (43.8%). Claude Opus 5.5 with Claude Code and GPT-6 Astra with Pi each passed 35 of 105 (33.3%). A pass required the diagnosis and management plan to meet every criterion in the case-specific rubric. Timeouts counted as failures. Among the 14 models that passed at least one case, 2,097 runs failed. Data acquisition and diagnostic workup was the most frequent primary failure category (36%). In 15% of all analyzed failures, the agent failed to pursue the type of data the case required. In another 12%, it omitted a necessary non-sequencing investigation, such as a tissue stain, imaging study, or laboratory test. Paper: latch.bio/raredisease Leaderboard: benchmarks.bio/raredisease Blog: blog.latch.bio/p/raredisease… We think rare disease diagnosis is one of the areas where AI systems have the most potential to make rapid progress and directly benefit patients over the next few years. Incredible work from @chriswzou and team.
4
22
1,119
emilio andere retweeted
Excited to bring Kimi K3.1 Pro to @youdotcom Inference Router at Day-0! Together, we're making Moonshot AI's latest open-weight model production-ready for enterprise teams, backed by a 99.9% uptime SLA from the you.com team. Try it today (link in thread)
Kimi K3.1 Pro is live on Inference Router from day 0. K3.1 is @Kimi_Moonshot's most capable open-weight model yet, with a 1M context window and a reported 65.7% on Terminal-Bench 4.0. Run it in production with at least 99.9% uptime SLA, US hosting and ZDR available. No upfront commitment.
5
5
23
2,023
emilio andere retweeted
excited to partner with @youdotcom to serve kimi k3.1 pro on inference router from day 0 moonshot ai's latest open-weight model is now available with a 99.9% uptime sla from the you.com team and zero data retention. try it today (link in thread)
Kimi K3.1 Pro is live on Inference Router from day 0. K3.1 is @Kimi_Moonshot's most capable open-weight model yet, with a 1M context window and a reported 65.7% on Terminal-Bench 4.0. Run it in production with at least 99.9% uptime SLA, US hosting and ZDR available. No upfront commitment.
4
4
14
1,231
emilio andere retweeted
And me and team @MarathonMP with @wafer_ai 😍❤️
wish i loved something as much as a vc loves the inference company in their portfolio sarah guo with baseten sonya huang with fireworks
3
4
38
8,226
emilio andere retweeted
Stoked to be SemiAnalysis’s exclusive biology partner for GDPx. Very early days for AI in biology. Recommend digging into the trajectories: gdpx.semianalysis.com/domain… Read more about our contributions: gdpx.semianalysis.com/domain… Exceptional folks working on this project @arjunomics @maxkan @AndrewMegalaa
Today we’re releasing GDPx, a benchmark for measuring agentic capabilities across the most valuable domains. GDPx is a true frontier-level benchmark: even the best model scores just 12% (1/7)🧵
3
11
65
4,189
There’s a long list of billionaires who literally became billionaires by building companies to such a massive scale that they are able to be the low cost provider of services. The literal entire purpose of the business is to lower your bill! You are familiar with the canonical examples. Bezos and Amazon. Walton and Walmart. Sinegal and CostCo. Shit. Rockefeller. Henry Ford. And then you have a whole class of billionaires who built digital platforms that took what used to be thousands and thousands in annual spend and bundled it into an unbelievably cheap subscription. Daniel Ek and Spotify. Reed Hastings and Netflix. Not to mention Google! That’s all free! IKEA! Zara! I could keep going. You get the idea and this point. Regardless of how you feel about the eventual concentration of wealth that comes from building these services, it is ignorant at best (I won’t discuss the worst) to claim that consumers never benefit
Name one time a billionaire has lowered your bills
152
353
24
6,507
270,242
emilio andere retweeted
Wafer is now #3 on @OpenRouter in daily token volume!!
2
7
31
5,703
emilio andere retweeted
wowza part 2
Wafer is now #3 on @OpenRouter in daily token volume!!
2
4
37
1,640
emilio andere retweeted
Wafer is now #3 on @OpenRouter in daily token volume!!
14
15
6
128
22,314
Replying to @wafer_ai
@wafer_ai is now live on routerplus
1
5
2
17
4,194
emilio andere retweeted
cant say enough about the work ethic and speed that the team at @wafer_ai has shown during our engagements with them. pleased to announce that you can now access wafer's inference via @useRouterPlus @gpuemi , @gpusteve ar building up something solid here
Replying to @wafer_ai
@wafer_ai is now live on routerplus
5
9
52
3,097
emilio andere retweeted
The quality and velocity of execution of the @wafer_ai team is beyond impressive. Add to this their remarkable product / tech stack, insane customer centricity, strategic chops, nimbleness and overall caliber of every single person on the team, and you have an incredibly formidable company. Proud to be a supporter and investor. To infinity (tokens per day) and beyond. 📈
Took Wafer 4 months to get to 1 trillion tokens a day on @OpenRouter, but only 4 days to get to 2 trillion!
4
15
1
81
11,670
emilio andere retweeted
wowza!
Took Wafer 4 months to get to 1 trillion tokens a day on @OpenRouter, but only 4 days to get to 2 trillion!
2
4
62
2,759
emilio andere retweeted
Took Wafer 4 months to get to 1 trillion tokens a day on @OpenRouter, but only 4 days to get to 2 trillion!
19
11
7
174
25,500
emilio andere retweeted
listen to @gpusteve. he knows a thing or two about ai/gpu perf. four nvidia resources covering: - how cuda device code becomes ptx and cubins, how fatbins package gpu code, and when the driver compiles ptx at runtime. - gpu targets, device linking, intermediate files, and compiler reports for registers, shared memory, and spills. - ptx state spaces, memory ordering, synchronization, matrix instructions, and accumulation precision. - reading generated sass and checking register counts and static memory usage with cuobjdump, plus inspecting register liveness with nvdisasm. useful when your "optimized" kernel gets slower
if i had to learn cuda compilation, ptx, register spills, and gpu disassembly from scratch because my "optimized" kernel got slower, i'd start here links in thread 🧵 the compilation and machine code section of our ai performance engineering repo contains four nvidia resources for understanding how cuda source becomes gpu instructions and inspecting the code behind ai kernels: understanding ptx explains how nvcc separates cpu and gpu code, why ptx is a virtual instruction set, and how ptxas turns it into a cubin. the article covers fatbins, driver jit compilation, and gpu compatibility, giving context for deployment targets and inference startup costs. nvcc compiler driver covers gpu architecture targets, the files each compilation stage produces, separate compilation, and device linking. the nvcc guide explains how to retain intermediate files and report register usage, shared memory, and spill loads and stores. those compiler reports help compare kernel builds after changes to tile size, unrolling, or fusion. ptx isa defines register, local, shared, and global state spaces; memory ordering and synchronization; and arithmetic and matrix instructions. ptx isa details operand layouts, data types, accumulation precision, and gpu requirements, plus completion rules for asynchronous copies. useful for checking data movement and numerical behavior in attention and matmul kernels. cuda binary utilities covers extracting embedded ptx and cubins, disassembling native gpu instructions (sass), and reporting register counts and static memory usage with cuobjdump. nvdisasm provides control-flow graphs when the cubin contains complete relocation information, plus register-liveness views. with debug line information, nvdisasm can annotate instructions with source lines. useful for inspecting generated loads, stores, branches, and arithmetic after a kernel rewrite. together, these resources connect the compilation process to the code being measured. they help identify what changed between kernel builds and what to investigate before the next correctness check or benchmark. follow and save to keep up with the series.
13
7
121
7,083
emilio andere retweeted
if i had to learn cuda compilation, ptx, register spills, and gpu disassembly from scratch because my "optimized" kernel got slower, i'd start here links in thread 🧵 the compilation and machine code section of our ai performance engineering repo contains four nvidia resources for understanding how cuda source becomes gpu instructions and inspecting the code behind ai kernels: understanding ptx explains how nvcc separates cpu and gpu code, why ptx is a virtual instruction set, and how ptxas turns it into a cubin. the article covers fatbins, driver jit compilation, and gpu compatibility, giving context for deployment targets and inference startup costs. nvcc compiler driver covers gpu architecture targets, the files each compilation stage produces, separate compilation, and device linking. the nvcc guide explains how to retain intermediate files and report register usage, shared memory, and spill loads and stores. those compiler reports help compare kernel builds after changes to tile size, unrolling, or fusion. ptx isa defines register, local, shared, and global state spaces; memory ordering and synchronization; and arithmetic and matrix instructions. ptx isa details operand layouts, data types, accumulation precision, and gpu requirements, plus completion rules for asynchronous copies. useful for checking data movement and numerical behavior in attention and matmul kernels. cuda binary utilities covers extracting embedded ptx and cubins, disassembling native gpu instructions (sass), and reporting register counts and static memory usage with cuobjdump. nvdisasm provides control-flow graphs when the cubin contains complete relocation information, plus register-liveness views. with debug line information, nvdisasm can annotate instructions with source lines. useful for inspecting generated loads, stores, branches, and arithmetic after a kernel rewrite. together, these resources connect the compilation process to the code being measured. they help identify what changed between kernel builds and what to investigate before the next correctness check or benchmark. follow and save to keep up with the series.
18
21
6
167
14,127
emilio andere retweeted
(token) trillionaire
1 trillion tokens a day on @OpenRouter!!
5
4
42
1,461